Values characteristics of Chinese college students with upper-level learning engagement.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414065
Songge Tang, Di Gao
{"title":"Values characteristics of Chinese college students with upper-level learning engagement.","authors":"Songge Tang, Di Gao","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, much of the research on learning engagement has more underlined the individual factors associated with levels of learning engagement among college students, but the connections between individual values and learning engagement has not been definitively elucidated. The aim of this research is to reveal the relationships between individual values preferences and degrees of learning engagement, and mainly focuses on the individual values preferences of Chinese college students with upper-level learning engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 360 first-year Chinese college students majored in foreign languages in Northeast China supported a two-cluster of students based on different learning engagement levels. The assignment of items in the UWES-S scale and the PVQ-21 scale was confirmed through a principal component method to identify the underlying dimensions of Chinese college students' learning engagement and values. A cluster analysis with K-means algorithm to cluster the participants based on their learning engagement levels. And a series of One-Way Analyses of Variance (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the differences between the cluster groups in relation to each of the values and mainly analyzed individual values characteristics of students with upper-level learning engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing values preferences of students with upper-level learning engagement and those with lower-level learning engagement, the results showed that students with upper-level learning engagement assigned more importance to \"Social Focus\" values, \"Openness to Change\" values, benevolence, and hedonism. Which presents a promising opportunity for future research to explore the potential impact of values education on students' learning engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research enhances the comprehension of the intricate relationship between learning engagement and values and offers a potential avenue for further investigation into the potential impact of values education on students' learning engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1414065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, much of the research on learning engagement has more underlined the individual factors associated with levels of learning engagement among college students, but the connections between individual values and learning engagement has not been definitively elucidated. The aim of this research is to reveal the relationships between individual values preferences and degrees of learning engagement, and mainly focuses on the individual values preferences of Chinese college students with upper-level learning engagement.

Methods: Data from 360 first-year Chinese college students majored in foreign languages in Northeast China supported a two-cluster of students based on different learning engagement levels. The assignment of items in the UWES-S scale and the PVQ-21 scale was confirmed through a principal component method to identify the underlying dimensions of Chinese college students' learning engagement and values. A cluster analysis with K-means algorithm to cluster the participants based on their learning engagement levels. And a series of One-Way Analyses of Variance (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the differences between the cluster groups in relation to each of the values and mainly analyzed individual values characteristics of students with upper-level learning engagement.

Results: Comparing values preferences of students with upper-level learning engagement and those with lower-level learning engagement, the results showed that students with upper-level learning engagement assigned more importance to "Social Focus" values, "Openness to Change" values, benevolence, and hedonism. Which presents a promising opportunity for future research to explore the potential impact of values education on students' learning engagement.

Conclusion: This research enhances the comprehension of the intricate relationship between learning engagement and values and offers a potential avenue for further investigation into the potential impact of values education on students' learning engagement.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国大学生上层学习投入的价值特征。
目前,很多关于学习投入的研究更多地强调了与大学生学习投入水平相关的个体因素,但个人价值观与学习投入之间的联系并没有得到明确的阐明。本研究的目的是揭示个人价值观偏好与学习投入程度之间的关系,主要关注具有较高学习投入水平的中国大学生的个人价值观偏好。方法:对东北地区360名外语专业一年级中国学生的数据进行分析,支持基于不同学习投入水平的两类学生。采用主成分法对UWES-S量表和PVQ-21量表的题项进行赋值,以确定中国大学生学习投入和价值观的潜在维度。采用K-means算法进行聚类分析,根据参与者的学习投入程度进行聚类。并采用单因素方差分析(ANOVAs)评估聚类组之间各值的差异,主要分析高水平学习投入学生的个体值特征。结果:比较高水平学习投入学生和低水平学习投入学生的价值观偏好,结果表明高水平学习投入学生更重视“社会关注”价值观、“乐于改变”价值观、“仁爱”价值观和享乐主义价值观。这为未来的研究探索价值观教育对学生学习投入的潜在影响提供了一个很好的机会。结论:本研究增进了对学习投入与价值观之间复杂关系的理解,并为进一步研究价值观教育对学生学习投入的潜在影响提供了可能的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
期刊最新文献
Exploring experiences of gratitude during musicking in a community orchestra: an intrinsic case study. Driven by engagement and social identity: refining the SOR framework to explore digital music consumption behaviors among Chinese undergraduate students on short video platforms. Exercise intervention for rumination: from neural mechanisms to clinical applications. Exploring the role of admiration in mitigating athlete burnout: an emotional perspective. Exploring the influence of AI self-study rooms on K-12 learners' motivation, self-regulation, enjoyment, and engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1