Deviation from preoperative planning and pedicle screw accuracy in navigated and robotic spinal fusion: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08822-z
Fabrizio Russo, Niccolò Nardi, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Rocco Papalia, Gianluca Vadalà, Vincenzo Denaro
{"title":"Deviation from preoperative planning and pedicle screw accuracy in navigated and robotic spinal fusion: a systematic review.","authors":"Fabrizio Russo, Niccolò Nardi, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Rocco Papalia, Gianluca Vadalà, Vincenzo Denaro","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08822-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Image-guided navigation and robotic systems have been introduced in spinal surgery to increase the accuracy of pedicle screws placement and reduce the rate of complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the different final screw deviation from pre-operative planning and the associated pedicle screw accuracy in spinal fusion surgery assisted by image-guided navigation or robotic systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic literature search was executed using PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Central, and Scopus on 30 April 2023. Studies that explored the deviation between final position and preoperative planning of pedicle screws assisted by image-guide navigation or robotic system were included. The data extracted were surgical approach, surgical aid, number of screws evaluated, spinal levels, accuracy and deviation of screws. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) or the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 15 studies, of which 5 used navigation and 10 robotic system. The studies involved 1487 patients, with the evaluation of a total of 7274 pedicle screws, with an assessment of planning and final position. The different methodologies to calculate the deviation include angular deviations in the axial and sagittal plane, 3D angular deviation, and tip and entry point deviation. Regarding screw accuracy, 98.15% of the screws were grade A or B, and 1.85% as category C or D.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although preoperative planning allows the surgeon to plan the final position of the screw most appropriately, mild deviations from it do not seem to excessively influence the accuracy of the spinal fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1890-1899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08822-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Image-guided navigation and robotic systems have been introduced in spinal surgery to increase the accuracy of pedicle screws placement and reduce the rate of complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the different final screw deviation from pre-operative planning and the associated pedicle screw accuracy in spinal fusion surgery assisted by image-guided navigation or robotic systems.

Methods: The systematic literature search was executed using PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Central, and Scopus on 30 April 2023. Studies that explored the deviation between final position and preoperative planning of pedicle screws assisted by image-guide navigation or robotic system were included. The data extracted were surgical approach, surgical aid, number of screws evaluated, spinal levels, accuracy and deviation of screws. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) or the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score.

Results: This review included 15 studies, of which 5 used navigation and 10 robotic system. The studies involved 1487 patients, with the evaluation of a total of 7274 pedicle screws, with an assessment of planning and final position. The different methodologies to calculate the deviation include angular deviations in the axial and sagittal plane, 3D angular deviation, and tip and entry point deviation. Regarding screw accuracy, 98.15% of the screws were grade A or B, and 1.85% as category C or D.

Conclusion: Although preoperative planning allows the surgeon to plan the final position of the screw most appropriately, mild deviations from it do not seem to excessively influence the accuracy of the spinal fusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导航和机器人脊柱融合术中术前计划偏差和椎弓根螺钉准确性:一项系统综述。
目的:图像引导导航和机器人系统已被引入脊柱外科,以提高椎弓根螺钉放置的准确性并减少并发症的发生率。本研究的目的是评估在图像导航或机器人系统辅助下脊柱融合手术中不同的最终螺钉偏离术前计划以及相关的椎弓根螺钉准确性。方法:于2023年4月30日使用PubMed-Medline、Cochrane Central和Scopus进行系统文献检索。在图像导航或机器人系统的辅助下,探讨椎弓根螺钉最终位置与术前计划之间的偏差。提取的数据包括手术入路、手术辅助、评估的螺钉数量、脊柱水平、螺钉的准确性和偏差。采用改进的Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具(RoB 2)或非随机研究方法学指数(minor)评分对研究质量进行评估。结果:本综述共纳入15项研究,其中导航系统5项,机器人系统10项。该研究涉及1487例患者,共评估了7274枚椎弓根螺钉,评估了计划和最终位置。计算偏差的不同方法包括轴向和矢状面角偏差、三维角偏差以及尖端和入口点偏差。在螺钉精度方面,98.15%的螺钉为A级或B级,1.85%为C级或d级。结论:尽管术前计划使外科医生能够最适当地规划螺钉的最终位置,但轻微的偏离似乎不会过度影响脊柱融合的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Thoracic corpectomy and vertebral body reconstruction (TCVBR): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mortality following surgical management of traumatic sub-axial cervical spine injuries in a South African tertiary centre. Agreement of CT versus MRI in reinvestigation of patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis. a comparison of surgically and non-surgically treated levels. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures (AO types A3/A4) with and without concomitant posterior ligamentous complex injury: treatment outcomes in surgically and nonsurgically managed patients. A multi-center prospective study. Factors associated with favorable outcomes of floating fusion or lumbosacral spinal fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of the incidence of mechanical complications from a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1