Low rates of symptom exacerbation during and after massed cognitive processing therapy across veteran and community samples

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of traumatic stress Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1002/jts.23158
Daniel Szoke, Michelle Ptak, Sarah Pridgen, Dale L. Smith, Philip Held
{"title":"Low rates of symptom exacerbation during and after massed cognitive processing therapy across veteran and community samples","authors":"Daniel Szoke,&nbsp;Michelle Ptak,&nbsp;Sarah Pridgen,&nbsp;Dale L. Smith,&nbsp;Philip Held","doi":"10.1002/jts.23158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinicians have expressed concerns that symptoms may worsen during evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), such as cognitive processing therapy (CPT). The current study examined rates of symptom exacerbation in two samples undergoing massed CPT: veterans (<i>N</i> = 499) and community members (<i>N</i> = 69). The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for <i>DSM-5</i> (PCL-5) was administered throughout treatment in both samples, and exacerbation was calculated based on changes from one assessment point to the next during treatment. Clinically reliable exacerbation, defined as a PCL-5 score increase greater than 8.83 points in consecutive measurements taken throughout treatment, was observed at least once in 27.3% of veterans and 21.7% of community members during treatment. Only 1.4% of veterans and 5.8% of community members reported reliably elevated symptoms from baseline at the end of treatment. The findings suggest low rates of clinically meaningful exacerbation during massed CPT, highlighting its utility across diverse populations and treatment formats. These results can inform clinician-patient discussions, alleviate concerns about worsening symptoms, and assuage clinician concerns about symptom exacerbation during CPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 4","pages":"749-756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jts.23158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinicians have expressed concerns that symptoms may worsen during evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), such as cognitive processing therapy (CPT). The current study examined rates of symptom exacerbation in two samples undergoing massed CPT: veterans (N = 499) and community members (N = 69). The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) was administered throughout treatment in both samples, and exacerbation was calculated based on changes from one assessment point to the next during treatment. Clinically reliable exacerbation, defined as a PCL-5 score increase greater than 8.83 points in consecutive measurements taken throughout treatment, was observed at least once in 27.3% of veterans and 21.7% of community members during treatment. Only 1.4% of veterans and 5.8% of community members reported reliably elevated symptoms from baseline at the end of treatment. The findings suggest low rates of clinically meaningful exacerbation during massed CPT, highlighting its utility across diverse populations and treatment formats. These results can inform clinician-patient discussions, alleviate concerns about worsening symptoms, and assuage clinician concerns about symptom exacerbation during CPT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在退伍军人和社区样本中,大规模认知加工治疗期间和之后的症状恶化率低。
临床医生对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的循证治疗(如认知处理疗法(CPT))可能会加重症状表示担忧。目前的研究检查了两个接受大规模CPT的样本的症状加重率:退伍军人(N = 499)和社区成员(N = 69)。在整个治疗过程中,两组患者均使用DSM-5创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5),并根据治疗期间各评估点的变化计算加重程度。临床可靠的恶化,定义为在整个治疗过程中连续测量的PCL-5评分增加大于8.83分,在治疗期间,27.3%的退伍军人和21.7%的社区成员至少观察到一次。只有1.4%的退伍军人和5.8%的社区成员报告在治疗结束时症状从基线上升。研究结果表明,大规模CPT期间临床有意义的恶化率较低,突出了其在不同人群和治疗形式中的实用性。这些结果可以为临床与患者的讨论提供信息,减轻对症状恶化的担忧,减轻临床医生对CPT期间症状恶化的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
期刊最新文献
Indirect effects of Seeking Safety plus sertraline on alcohol use: The mediating role of reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity. Posttraumatic cognitions after military sexual assault are more strongly associated with sexual risk-taking among male service members and veterans. Precision prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom surges: A pilot study integrating real-time daily data with supervised learning. Impact of an app-based early intervention for survivors of recent sexual assault on social functioning outcomes. Cognition improvement in U.S. veterans undergoing treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1