Navigating the Crossroads: A 10-Year Population Study on Access to Care Among Patients With Brain Tumor.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003439
Zerubabbel K Asfaw, Tirone Young, John Durbin, Lewis Tomalin, Isabelle M Germano
{"title":"Navigating the Crossroads: A 10-Year Population Study on Access to Care Among Patients With Brain Tumor.","authors":"Zerubabbel K Asfaw, Tirone Young, John Durbin, Lewis Tomalin, Isabelle M Germano","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Health care disparities are introduced at various points along the patient care continuum. This study explores disparities in initial health care access for patients with brain tumor (BT) in New York City (NYC) and New York State (NYS), comparing emergency department (ED) and elective admissions (EA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2010-2020 data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System of NYS, patients were identified through relevant billing codes. Demographic, socioeconomic, and health care access variables were examined using univariate analysis and logistic mixed effects regression. The data were dichotomized by care location-NYC or NYS- and entry care site, ED vs EA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cross-sectional study included 48 135 patients. Over the decade, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients with BT admitted through the ED ( P < .001) without differences between the 2 cohorts. The NYC cohort (24 283 patients) had a higher proportion of younger, affluent individuals, racial/ethnic minorities, and publicly insured patients ( P < .001). Male sex and older age were significantly associated with ED admissions in both cohorts ( P < .05). Black, Hispanic/Latinx patients, and those with public health insurance were more likely to be admitted through ED ( P < .001). Residing in census tracts within the lowest 3 quartiles was positively associated with ED admission in the NYC but not the NYS cohort ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Racial minorities with public insurance who reside in urban areas of low median household income are more likely to access BT care through ED rather than EA. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of proximity to a hospital on access to care in rural areas. This study highlights the opportunities for policy and health care delivery changes to address current inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"884-892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Health care disparities are introduced at various points along the patient care continuum. This study explores disparities in initial health care access for patients with brain tumor (BT) in New York City (NYC) and New York State (NYS), comparing emergency department (ED) and elective admissions (EA).

Methods: Using 2010-2020 data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System of NYS, patients were identified through relevant billing codes. Demographic, socioeconomic, and health care access variables were examined using univariate analysis and logistic mixed effects regression. The data were dichotomized by care location-NYC or NYS- and entry care site, ED vs EA.

Results: The cross-sectional study included 48 135 patients. Over the decade, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients with BT admitted through the ED ( P < .001) without differences between the 2 cohorts. The NYC cohort (24 283 patients) had a higher proportion of younger, affluent individuals, racial/ethnic minorities, and publicly insured patients ( P < .001). Male sex and older age were significantly associated with ED admissions in both cohorts ( P < .05). Black, Hispanic/Latinx patients, and those with public health insurance were more likely to be admitted through ED ( P < .001). Residing in census tracts within the lowest 3 quartiles was positively associated with ED admission in the NYC but not the NYS cohort ( P < .001).

Conclusion: Racial minorities with public insurance who reside in urban areas of low median household income are more likely to access BT care through ED rather than EA. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of proximity to a hospital on access to care in rural areas. This study highlights the opportunities for policy and health care delivery changes to address current inequities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导航十字路口:一项关于脑肿瘤患者获得护理的10年人口研究。
背景和目的:在病人护理连续体的各个点上介绍了医疗保健差异。本研究探讨了纽约市(NYC)和纽约州(NYS)脑肿瘤(BT)患者初始医疗保健可及性的差异,比较了急诊科(ED)和选择性入院(EA)。方法:使用2010-2020年纽约州规划与研究合作系统的数据,通过相关计费代码识别患者。采用单变量分析和logistic混合效应回归对人口统计学、社会经济和卫生保健可及性变量进行检验。数据按护理地点(纽约市或纽约州)和进入护理地点(ED vs ea)进行二分类。结果:横断面研究包括48135例患者。在过去的十年中,通过急诊科入院的BT患者百分比显著下降(P < 0.001),两组之间没有差异。纽约市队列(24283例患者)中年轻、富裕个体、种族/少数民族和公共保险患者的比例较高(P < .001)。在两个队列中,男性性别和年龄与ED入院率显著相关(P < 0.05)。黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者和有公共健康保险的患者更有可能通过急诊科入院(P < 0.001)。居住在最低3个四分位数内的人口普查区与纽约市的ED入院率呈正相关,但与纽约州的队列无关(P < 0.001)。结论:居住在家庭收入中位数较低的城市地区,拥有公共保险的少数种族更有可能通过ED而不是EA获得BT护理。需要进一步的研究来评估靠近医院对农村地区获得护理的影响。这项研究强调了政策和卫生保健服务变革的机会,以解决当前的不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
A New Urban Conflict. The Safety and Effectiveness of Surgical Management of Brachial Plexus Tumors: A Retrospective Case Series. In Reply: Neurological Surgery Manpower Training and Density in Islamic Republic of Iran: A Population Study. Letter: Neurological Surgery Manpower Training and Density in Islamic Republic of Iran: A Population Study. Efficacy of Vancomycin Powder Prophylaxis in 987 Cranial Surgeries for Nonmalignant Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1