[Between experiencing meaning and self-realization: a qualitative study on utilization of help from the perspective of family caregivers].

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s00391-025-02437-1
Jenny Kubitza, Verena Steinmaier, Eckhard Frick
{"title":"[Between experiencing meaning and self-realization: a qualitative study on utilization of help from the perspective of family caregivers].","authors":"Jenny Kubitza, Verena Steinmaier, Eckhard Frick","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02437-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family caregivers (FC) rarely utilize formal and informal help, which affects their burden and quality of life. Factors that result in rejection are often psychosocial (shame, guilt, heteronomy and social expectations). Previous studies on psychosocial reasons neglected the spiritual dimension. This study aims to identify the psychosociospiritual reasons for the (non)utílization of help from the perspective of FCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 FCs between August 2022 and July 2023 and analyzed according to Mayring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FCs request formal and informal help to find a balance between their needs and those of the persons in need of care and to develop and maintain interpersonal boundaries. Help is rejected due to negative experiences with help offers as well as personal, familiar, and social role expectations. As long as nursing care is seen as the only meaning in life, help from outside can be perceived as a threat.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When utilizing help, it is not only about the quality of the offered help but also about its compatibility with one's own values and aims. Psychosociospiritual counselling should be provided before counselling for benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"583-589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12568785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02437-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers (FC) rarely utilize formal and informal help, which affects their burden and quality of life. Factors that result in rejection are often psychosocial (shame, guilt, heteronomy and social expectations). Previous studies on psychosocial reasons neglected the spiritual dimension. This study aims to identify the psychosociospiritual reasons for the (non)utílization of help from the perspective of FCs.

Methods: This qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 FCs between August 2022 and July 2023 and analyzed according to Mayring.

Results: The FCs request formal and informal help to find a balance between their needs and those of the persons in need of care and to develop and maintain interpersonal boundaries. Help is rejected due to negative experiences with help offers as well as personal, familiar, and social role expectations. As long as nursing care is seen as the only meaning in life, help from outside can be perceived as a threat.

Conclusion: When utilizing help, it is not only about the quality of the offered help but also about its compatibility with one's own values and aims. Psychosociospiritual counselling should be provided before counselling for benefits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在体验意义和自我实现之间:从家庭照顾者的角度对利用帮助的定性研究]。
背景:家庭照顾者很少利用正式和非正式的帮助,这影响了他们的负担和生活质量。导致拒绝的因素通常是心理上的(羞耻、内疚、他律和社会期望)。以往对社会心理原因的研究忽略了精神层面。本研究旨在从FCs的角度,找出(不)utílization帮助的心理社会精神原因。方法:本定性研究在2022年8月至2023年7月期间对24名金融服务中心进行半结构化访谈,并根据Mayring进行分析。结果:家庭护理人员需要正式和非正式的帮助,以在他们的需要和需要照顾的人的需要之间找到平衡,并建立和维持人际关系的界限。拒绝帮助是由于对提供帮助的负面经历以及个人、熟悉和社会角色的期望。只要护理被视为生活的唯一意义,来自外界的帮助就会被视为一种威胁。结论:在使用帮助时,不仅要看所提供帮助的质量,还要看其是否符合自己的价值观和目标。心理社会精神咨询应在咨询前进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Abstracts der Jahrestagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Geriatrie und Gerontologie : „Altsein war gestern, Altwerden ist morgen“. [Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a neurogeriatric syndrome]. [Special considerations in geriatric anesthesiology : Aspects of perioperative management in older adults]. [Social space and narrative identity in old age : Approaching digitality in space and narration among persons in assisted living facilities]. [Framework conditions and conditions for success of digital education and participation in geriatric care facilities].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1