Participant engagement in a moderated Facebook group to promote COVID-19 vaccination.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Health Education Research Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1093/her/cyaf008
Tien-Chin Wu, Lorien C Abroms, Melissa Napolitano, Christina N Wysota, Donald Koban, David A Broniatowski
{"title":"Participant engagement in a moderated Facebook group to promote COVID-19 vaccination.","authors":"Tien-Chin Wu, Lorien C Abroms, Melissa Napolitano, Christina N Wysota, Donald Koban, David A Broniatowski","doi":"10.1093/her/cyaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions with high levels of engagement have been found to be more effective at changing health behavior than those with low levels. Few prior studies have examined whether engagement in interventions using social media groups is associated with higher program effectiveness. This study examined whether participant engagement in a moderated private Facebook group aimed at COVID-19 vaccination was associated with improvements in immunization intentions (N = 263). Engagement in the group (i.e. emoji reactions, comments, poll votes and posts) and change in COVID-19 vaccine intentions were assessed through a retrospective review of participant engagement metrics and self-reported surveys at 4 weeks. Overall, 59% of participants engaged at least once. Participants on average made 11.9 total engagements during the 4-week study (SD = 25.5), of which 6.3 (SD = 15.2) were emoji reactions, 4.0 (SD = 12.3) comments, 1.4 (SD = 2.2) poll votes and 0.2 (SD = 0.7) post. No significant differences were found between engagement and sociodemographic characteristics or group size. Emoji reactions were associated with increased intentions. Each emoji reaction used was associated with a 4% increase in the odds of improvements in intention to vaccinate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.08, P = 0.015). Future interventions on social media should encourage users to use emoji reactions on posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions with high levels of engagement have been found to be more effective at changing health behavior than those with low levels. Few prior studies have examined whether engagement in interventions using social media groups is associated with higher program effectiveness. This study examined whether participant engagement in a moderated private Facebook group aimed at COVID-19 vaccination was associated with improvements in immunization intentions (N = 263). Engagement in the group (i.e. emoji reactions, comments, poll votes and posts) and change in COVID-19 vaccine intentions were assessed through a retrospective review of participant engagement metrics and self-reported surveys at 4 weeks. Overall, 59% of participants engaged at least once. Participants on average made 11.9 total engagements during the 4-week study (SD = 25.5), of which 6.3 (SD = 15.2) were emoji reactions, 4.0 (SD = 12.3) comments, 1.4 (SD = 2.2) poll votes and 0.2 (SD = 0.7) post. No significant differences were found between engagement and sociodemographic characteristics or group size. Emoji reactions were associated with increased intentions. Each emoji reaction used was associated with a 4% increase in the odds of improvements in intention to vaccinate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.08, P = 0.015). Future interventions on social media should encourage users to use emoji reactions on posts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与者参与一个适度的Facebook小组,以促进COVID-19疫苗接种。
研究发现,参与度高的干预措施比参与度低的干预措施更能有效地改变人们的健康行为。此前很少有研究探讨参与社交媒体群组的干预是否与更高的项目效果相关。本研究考察了参与者参与一个针对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的、经过调节的 Facebook 私人群组是否与免疫意向的改善有关(N = 263)。通过对参与者参与度指标的回顾性审查以及 4 周后的自我报告调查,评估了参与者在群组中的参与度(即表情符号反应、评论、投票和发帖)以及 COVID-19 疫苗接种意向的变化。总体而言,59% 的参与者至少参与了一次。在为期 4 周的研究中,参与者平均参与了 11.9 次(SD = 25.5),其中 6.3 次(SD = 15.2)是表情反应,4.0 次(SD = 12.3)是评论,1.4 次(SD = 2.2)是投票,0.2 次(SD = 0.7)是发帖。参与度与社会人口特征或小组规模之间没有明显差异。表情符号反应与意向增加有关。每使用一次表情符号反应,疫苗接种意向提高的几率就会增加 4%,调整后的几率比 (aOR) = 1.04,95% CI:1.01-1.08,P = 0.015)。未来的社交媒体干预措施应鼓励用户在帖子中使用表情符号反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
期刊最新文献
When Baidu meets the clinic: exploring how cyberchondria shapes patient satisfaction through trust in doctors and patient commitment. Designing behavioural change intervention module for tobacco cessation counselling among pregnant tobacco users in India: a methodology paper. Understanding facilitators and barriers of HPV vaccination amongst adolescent boys and their parents in high-income countries through the social-ecological model: a scoping review. Correction to: The effect of lifestyle-based health promotion intervention on health behaviour, irrational heath beliefs, and eating behaviour of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diet self-management and education encounter in confucianism-dominated culture: a qualitative study of taiwanese with poor diabetes control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1