Health Education Research最新文献

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) may develop into sight-threatening DR and vision loss if early intervention is not carried out. This study was aimed to assess the effectiveness of DR health education program for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The quasi-experimental research design was applied. The intervention group underwent a web-based DR health education program while the control group was followed up the usual way at an ophthalmology clinic for 1 year. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, repeated measures ANOVA and general linear model to evaluate the mean difference between groups. A total of 180 patients with T2DM were enrolled in the study, with equal number in the control and intervention groups, respectively, with 28% of dropout rate. There was a significant mean difference in knowledge score [F (1178)  = 116.57, P = 0.001], diabetes self-care [F (1178)  = 116.57, P = 0.001] and visual-related quality of life [F (1178)  = 12.70), P = 0.001] between the control and the intervention groups. The intervention group scored the highest in all three categories. Educational interventions positively affected adherence to self-care and visual-related quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients as shown in this study. DRHEP should be considered an added benefit in T2DM management, starting with comprehensive care enrollment.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of motivational interview-based breastfeeding education on breastfeeding motivation, breastfeeding success, self-efficacy perceptions, and exclusive breastfeeding duration in primiparous mothers after cesarean section. A parallel-group randomized controlled experimental study. Mothers were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG; n = 39) and a control group (CG; n = 37). IG was provided with four sessions of motivational interview-based breastfeeding education, while CG did not receive any motivational interview-based education. The research data were collected by using 'Introductory Information Form', 'Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form', 'LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool', 'The Primipara Breastfeeding Motivation Scale', and 'Importance and Confidence-Sufficiency Rulers'. In addition, in the follow-ups except for the pretest, mothers were asked about exclusive breastfeeding. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials database (NCT05562245). Group × time interactions in mothers, breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding success, the value ascribed to breastfeeding, breastfeeding self-effectiveness, and confidence sufficiency in breastfeeding ability were statistically significant (P < 0.05). A motivational interviewing-based breastfeeding education provided to mothers increased their breastfeeding self-efficacy, the value ascribed to breastfeeding, and confidence sufficiency in breastfeeding ability. Therefore, motivational interviewing can contribute to mothers' positive experience of breastfeeding.

The purpose of this review was to identify interventions promoting breastfeeding (BF), BF practices and their outcomes in Iran. Using the PRISMA-ScR Guidelines, we searched across 14 databases for publications published between 2010 and February 2024 to identify studies published in English or Farsi language in peer-reviewed journals, using search terms 'breastfeeding', 'lactation', 'education', 'promotion', 'intervention' and 'program'. Inclusion criteria included intervention-based studies with quantitative outcomes of pregnant women/mothers receiving education, training or other intervention that promoted BF or exclusive BF. Excluded studies were protocols, those examining Iranian communities outside of Iran publications in other languages, brief communications, gray literature and qualitative studies. After screening for relevance, identified articles that met the inclusion criteria were summarized and tabulated using Rayyan QCRI software. Of the 45 identified studies, 37 used randomized-control trial designs, 20 applied theoretical frameworks or specific counseling techniques. Samples included women pregnant for the first time, mothers of babies born prematurely or with low-birth weight, adolescents, mothers who had very young children at home. Only three studies included family members. BF self-efficacy was the most popular variable to assess, which was examined in 32 studies. Almost all studies showed positive results as a result of intervention. Majority of studies were focused at the individual level. No studies were identified that assessed strategies to change routine care or policies that might facilitate BF. Identifying barriers to moving intervention content into standard of care is an important next step in the development of BF research in Iran.

This randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate effects of face-to-face education and tele-education given to individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants on their medication compliance and satisfaction levels. The study sample comprised 150 individuals. Of them, 50 were assigned to the control group, 50 to experimental Group 1, and 50 to experimental Group 2. Data were collected with the Descriptive Information Form, Medication Compliance Notification Scale, and Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS). Intervention Group 1 was given face-to-face education. Intervention Group 2 was given tele-education. The control group underwent no intervention. The scales were administered to all the groups twice. Intragroup analysis demonstrated that the Medication Compliance Notification Scale score of the face-to-face education group increased significantly in the final measurement compared to those of the control group and tele-education group. Intergroup analysis demonstrated that the DASS scores of the three groups significantly differed. The difference stemmed from intervention Group 1. Face-to-face education given to individuals with AF on oral anticoagulants improved their medication compliance and medication satisfaction levels. Nurses should primarily use face-to-face education in the care and education programs of individuals with AF.

This study investigated whether noticing cannabis education campaigns was associated with increased cannabis risk perceptions in Canada's three territories following non-medical cannabis legalization. Data were from the Cannabis Policy Study in the Territories, including 2452 participants, age ≥16 years residing in Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut. Poisson regression with robust standard errors were used to estimate associations between noticing cannabis education campaigns and moderate to very high risk perceptions of daily cannabis smoking, vaping, edible use and exposure to second-hand cannabis smoke, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and cannabis-use frequency. Results were compared with associations with risk perceptions of daily alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking, not included in cannabis education campaigns. Interactions were examined between noticing education campaigns and age group and cannabis-use frequency. Cannabis education campaigns were noticed by 40.4% of respondents, with lower awareness among those with lower education and income. Noticing campaigns was associated with higher risk perceptions of daily cannabis smoking [adjusted risk ratio (RRadj) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.16] and vaping (RRadj = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.02-1.16). Significant interactions were not found with age group or cannabis-use frequency. Findings are consistent with modest effects of cannabis education campaigns. Approaches are needed to increase reach of cannabis education campaigns, including among groups with lower education and income.

This systematic review aimed to assess the features and effectiveness of individual-level randomized controlled trials targeting COVID-19 misinformation. The selection process included rigorous criteria, resulting in the inclusion of 24 individual studies from 21 papers. The majority of studies were conducted in high-income countries, with the accuracy/credibility of information as the primary outcome. Debunking and boosting interventions were the most common interventions while nudging and content labeling interventions were examined in a few studies. This study highlights that further research is needed to enhance the effectiveness of boosting strategies and to explore the impact of combined interventions. Addressing bias concerns and standardizing intervention assessment measures will contribute to the development of evidence-based approaches in this critical area.

Although various approaches have been used in diabetes self-management education (DSME) programs, the effect of DSME programs on glycemic control is controversial. This study aimed to compare the effects of structured individual education and combined education on glycemic regulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study included T2DM patients who applied to the Ust Kaynarca Diabetes Center between 1 January 2018 and 11 March 2020. All data were retrospectively evaluated from hospital information systems. Patients who received only individual education were defined as the individual education group (IEG), and patients who received both individual and group education were defined as the combined education group (CEG). A total of 496 T2DM patients, with 248 (50.0%) in the IEG and 248 (50.0%) in the CEG, were included in the study. The change in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) value for the IEG was 1.0% (2.5%), while the ΔHbA1c value for the CEG was 1.9% (2.8%) (P < 0.001). When factors affecting the glycemic control were evaluated, it was determined that the type of education [odds ratio (OR) = 2.295, P < 0.001], gender (OR = 1.799, P = 0.007), presence of hyperlipidemia (OR = 0.559, P = 0.032) and presence of medications added to treatment (OR = 1.558, P = 0.041) were effective on glycemic control. Combined education, in which individual and group education are conducted together, is more effective than individual education in glucose regulation.

The use of the best teaching method to promote self-care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been well defined. Therefore, the current study was conducted to compare the effect of self-care education by two methods of teach-back and a smartphone application. The current clinical trial with a pre- and post-test design was conducted among 78 patients with IBD. Patients were allocated to three groups of application, teach-back and control using a simple blocked randomization. Data were collected using a checklist for demographic information and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Self-efficacy Scale. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS. Participants in all three groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic variables. The mean pretest scores of self-efficacy (SE) in the application, teach-back and control groups were 191.37 ± 49.15, 193.92 ± 45.54 and 192.76 ± 43.12, respectively. The mean post-test scores of SE in the application, teach-back and control groups were 224.51 ± 49.89, 207.48 ± 48.109 and 189.92 ± 40.28, respectively (P = 0.033). The results of the current study showed that self-care education by the application can better improve the mean scores of SE and its four dimensions of managing stress and emotions, managing symptoms and disease, managing medical care and maintaining remission, compared to other methods. It seems that the use of the application as a continuous and cost-effective educational strategy will become widespread in the future for patient education among most healthcare and treatment systems.