Are Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) research ready? A regional evaluation in England: the Research ABC project (AHPs Building Research Capacity Across the Black Country).

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06931-3
Ali Aries, Roanna Burgess, Louise Wallace, Tina Hadley-Barrows, Amy Palmer, Rosalind Leslie
{"title":"Are Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) research ready? A regional evaluation in England: the Research ABC project (AHPs Building Research Capacity Across the Black Country).","authors":"Ali Aries, Roanna Burgess, Louise Wallace, Tina Hadley-Barrows, Amy Palmer, Rosalind Leslie","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06931-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research active organisations achieve better healthcare outcomes. The Research ABC Project (Allied Health Professions (AHPs) Building Research Capacity Across the Black Country), funded from 1/8/23-31/3/24 by a Clinical Research Network West Midlands Improvement and Innovation grant, was commissioned to facilitate the Black Country Integrated Care System to address the four domains of Health Education England's AHPs' Research and Innovation Strategy for England (capacity, capability, context and culture). This evaluation aimed to understand research-readiness, initiate research skills development through bespoke training, increase research capacity of the local AHP Community and inform the Integrated Care Board of future requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AHPs in six Black Country NHS Trusts, West Midlands, United Kingdom (n = 2396) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey via Microsoft forms (October-November 2023). Baseline levels of engagement in research activities, existing research skills, barriers to engagement, and training needs were explored. Descriptive analysis and thematic analysis for free text answers were undertaken. Project outputs included bespoke training, shared digital space, and Research Champions identification and support; success of the project was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 440 eligible responses from 11 of 14 professions (response rate 18.4%) with over half qualified > 10 years. Qualifications ranged from diploma (5.9%), degree/BSc (40.2%), postgraduate credits (27.0%), and MSc (24.6%) to PhD (0.9%). Research outputs were limited: 85.9% had no publications, 83.8% no abstract submissions; only 6.8% had Chief/Principal Investigator experience. However, audit (83.6%), service evaluation (75.9%), and quality improvement (78.9%) activities were common. Main barriers to research engagement were work pressures (42%), commitments outside work (22%), deemed not applicable (14%), not supported (8%), and not interested (7%). Training needs and Research Champions (n = 93) were identified. Training sessions (n = 23) were attended by 169 AHPs and well-evaluated. The digital space facilitated networking (285 AHPs signed-up).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Research ABC project identified baseline research levels for AHPs across the Black Country, and delivered training, with potential to develop research capability and capacity. Research Champions enable research, creating a supportive environment (context) and changing culture, addressing the AHP Research Strategy vision. The Research ABC model and GO-RESEARCH recommendations (developed from the project findings) could be adopted more widely to help drive AHP research forward; appropriate infrastructure and raising the importance of research is essential to achieve this in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06931-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research active organisations achieve better healthcare outcomes. The Research ABC Project (Allied Health Professions (AHPs) Building Research Capacity Across the Black Country), funded from 1/8/23-31/3/24 by a Clinical Research Network West Midlands Improvement and Innovation grant, was commissioned to facilitate the Black Country Integrated Care System to address the four domains of Health Education England's AHPs' Research and Innovation Strategy for England (capacity, capability, context and culture). This evaluation aimed to understand research-readiness, initiate research skills development through bespoke training, increase research capacity of the local AHP Community and inform the Integrated Care Board of future requirements.

Methods: AHPs in six Black Country NHS Trusts, West Midlands, United Kingdom (n = 2396) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey via Microsoft forms (October-November 2023). Baseline levels of engagement in research activities, existing research skills, barriers to engagement, and training needs were explored. Descriptive analysis and thematic analysis for free text answers were undertaken. Project outputs included bespoke training, shared digital space, and Research Champions identification and support; success of the project was evaluated.

Results: There were 440 eligible responses from 11 of 14 professions (response rate 18.4%) with over half qualified > 10 years. Qualifications ranged from diploma (5.9%), degree/BSc (40.2%), postgraduate credits (27.0%), and MSc (24.6%) to PhD (0.9%). Research outputs were limited: 85.9% had no publications, 83.8% no abstract submissions; only 6.8% had Chief/Principal Investigator experience. However, audit (83.6%), service evaluation (75.9%), and quality improvement (78.9%) activities were common. Main barriers to research engagement were work pressures (42%), commitments outside work (22%), deemed not applicable (14%), not supported (8%), and not interested (7%). Training needs and Research Champions (n = 93) were identified. Training sessions (n = 23) were attended by 169 AHPs and well-evaluated. The digital space facilitated networking (285 AHPs signed-up).

Conclusions: The Research ABC project identified baseline research levels for AHPs across the Black Country, and delivered training, with potential to develop research capability and capacity. Research Champions enable research, creating a supportive environment (context) and changing culture, addressing the AHP Research Strategy vision. The Research ABC model and GO-RESEARCH recommendations (developed from the project findings) could be adopted more widely to help drive AHP research forward; appropriate infrastructure and raising the importance of research is essential to achieve this in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合医疗专业人员(AHPs)的研究准备好了吗?英国的区域评价:研究ABC项目(AHPs在整个黑人国家建立研究能力)。
背景:研究活跃的组织实现更好的医疗保健结果。研究ABC项目(联合卫生专业人员(AHPs)在整个黑人国家建立研究能力),由临床研究网络西米德兰兹改进和创新资助,从1/8/23-31/3/24资助,委托促进黑人国家综合护理系统,以解决健康教育英格兰AHPs研究和创新战略的四个领域(能力,能力,背景和文化)。该评估旨在了解研究准备情况,通过定制培训启动研究技能开发,提高当地AHP社区的研究能力,并向综合护理委员会通报未来的需求。方法:通过微软表格(2023年10月至11月)邀请英国西米德兰兹郡六个黑人国家NHS信托机构的ahp (n = 2396)参加横断面调查。研究探讨了参与研究活动的基线水平、现有的研究技能、参与的障碍和培训需求。对自由文本答案进行了描述性分析和专题分析。项目产出包括定制培训、共享数字空间以及研究冠军的识别和支持;对该项目的成功与否进行了评估。结果:在14个专业中,11个专业共收到440份合格回复(回复率18.4%),10年以上的合格回复超过一半。资格证书包括文凭(5.9%)、学位/理学士(40.2%)、研究生学分(27.0%)、理学硕士(24.6%)和博士(0.9%)。研究产出有限:85.9%未发表论文,83.8%未提交摘要;只有6.8%有总/首席研究员经验。然而,审计(83.6%)、服务评价(75.9%)和质量改进(78.9%)活动是常见的。研究参与的主要障碍是工作压力(42%)、工作之外的承诺(22%)、认为不适用(14%)、不支持(8%)和不感兴趣(7%)。确定了培训需求和研究冠军(n = 93)。培训课程(n = 23)由169名ahp参加,并得到良好评价。数字空间促进了网络(285个ahp注册)。结论:研究ABC项目确定了整个黑人国家ahp的基线研究水平,并提供了培训,具有发展研究能力和能力的潜力。研究冠军使研究,创造一个支持性的环境(背景)和不断变化的文化,解决AHP研究战略的愿景。可以更广泛地采用研究ABC模型和GO-RESEARCH建议(根据项目结果发展而来),以帮助推动AHP研究向前发展;适当的基础设施和提高研究的重要性对于在未来实现这一目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Impact of peer assessment on lecture quality and student learning outcomes in undergraduate medical education: a quasi-experimental study. Blended e-learning with handheld ultrasound devices improves practical competence in eFAST: a randomised controlled study. Developing a consensus-based competency framework for hospital pharmacists in the management of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs): a modified delphi study in Macao. Developing a Life-Cycle-Career Training System (LCCTS) in healthcare: a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) approach. Large language models enhance diagnostic reasoning of medical students in rheumatology: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1