Enhancing pragmatic competence in investigator-initiated clinical trials: structure and evaluation of the CONSCIOUS II training programme.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07054-5
Jitka Rychlíčková, Zora Čechová, Viktoria Nagy, Kateřina Nebeská, Lenka Součková, Stéphane Mouly, Gabor Laszlo Kovacs, Christine Kubiak, Eva Takács, Tiago H Moreira de Oliveira, Marco Painho, Emília C Monteiro, Sara Maia, Joana Batuca, Frances Shiely
{"title":"Enhancing pragmatic competence in investigator-initiated clinical trials: structure and evaluation of the CONSCIOUS II training programme.","authors":"Jitka Rychlíčková, Zora Čechová, Viktoria Nagy, Kateřina Nebeská, Lenka Součková, Stéphane Mouly, Gabor Laszlo Kovacs, Christine Kubiak, Eva Takács, Tiago H Moreira de Oliveira, Marco Painho, Emília C Monteiro, Sara Maia, Joana Batuca, Frances Shiely","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07054-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Investigator-initiated trials (IITs) bridge the gap between applied clinical research and everyday clinical practice. However, they require the skilled multidisciplinary teams from different backgrounds but all with clinical trial training to ensure trials are designed, conducted and reported according to best practice and regulatory standards. The availability of trainings to fulfil these needs is limited. The CONSCIOUS II project facilitated to expand the supply of such programmes. The objective is to describe the curriculum designed for PhD students and early-career researchers, and evaluate participants' perceptions and feedback after completion of the training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The curriculum was developed according to key principles that underpin building of competencies relevant to quality IITs and transdisciplinary skills. A multidisciplinary team created the curriculum, elaborated a comprehensive set of study materials, including the training platform. This team also conducted an international, collaborative pilot course. The effectiveness of the educational materials for the target audience was assessed through questionnaires administered after the pilot course. Additionally, all learning materials, including the video recordings of the pilot course, were externally evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 12-chapter thoroughly revised curriculum was developed for asynchronous preparation and served as a pre-class reading for a 3-month pilot course. The chapters, along with supplementary materials, and recordings of the pilot course are freely accessible on the CONSCIOUS II training platform. This platform facilitates the dissemination and implementation in the existing curricula. The feedback from both the pilot course participants and the stakeholders was uniformly positive across all survey aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This remote programme which combines asynchronous and synchronous components with international and interprofessional collaboration effectively addresses the gap in developing core competencies for the 21st -century clinical researchers. The implementation of this curriculum has the potential to improve the quality of IITs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"502"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07054-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Investigator-initiated trials (IITs) bridge the gap between applied clinical research and everyday clinical practice. However, they require the skilled multidisciplinary teams from different backgrounds but all with clinical trial training to ensure trials are designed, conducted and reported according to best practice and regulatory standards. The availability of trainings to fulfil these needs is limited. The CONSCIOUS II project facilitated to expand the supply of such programmes. The objective is to describe the curriculum designed for PhD students and early-career researchers, and evaluate participants' perceptions and feedback after completion of the training.

Methods: The curriculum was developed according to key principles that underpin building of competencies relevant to quality IITs and transdisciplinary skills. A multidisciplinary team created the curriculum, elaborated a comprehensive set of study materials, including the training platform. This team also conducted an international, collaborative pilot course. The effectiveness of the educational materials for the target audience was assessed through questionnaires administered after the pilot course. Additionally, all learning materials, including the video recordings of the pilot course, were externally evaluated.

Results: A 12-chapter thoroughly revised curriculum was developed for asynchronous preparation and served as a pre-class reading for a 3-month pilot course. The chapters, along with supplementary materials, and recordings of the pilot course are freely accessible on the CONSCIOUS II training platform. This platform facilitates the dissemination and implementation in the existing curricula. The feedback from both the pilot course participants and the stakeholders was uniformly positive across all survey aspects.

Conclusion: This remote programme which combines asynchronous and synchronous components with international and interprofessional collaboration effectively addresses the gap in developing core competencies for the 21st -century clinical researchers. The implementation of this curriculum has the potential to improve the quality of IITs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高研究者发起的临床试验的实际能力:CONSCIOUS II培训计划的结构和评估。
简介:研究者发起的试验(IITs)弥合了应用临床研究和日常临床实践之间的差距。然而,它们需要来自不同背景但都受过临床试验培训的熟练多学科团队,以确保根据最佳实践和监管标准设计、实施和报告试验。满足这些需要的培训是有限的。CONSCIOUS II项目有助于扩大这类方案的供应。目的是描述为博士生和早期职业研究人员设计的课程,并评估参与者在完成培训后的看法和反馈。方法:课程是根据关键原则开发的,这些原则支持与高质量iit和跨学科技能相关的能力建设。一个多学科团队创建了课程,详细阐述了一套全面的学习材料,包括培训平台。该小组还开展了一项国际合作试点课程。在试点课程结束后,通过发放问卷来评估针对目标受众的教育材料的有效性。此外,所有的学习材料,包括试点课程的录像,都进行了外部评价。结果:为异步准备开发了12章经过彻底修订的课程,并作为为期三个月的试点课程的课前阅读。这些章节以及补充材料和试点课程的录音都可以在CONSCIOUS II培训平台上免费获取。这个平台有助于现有课程的传播和实施。试点课程参与者和利益相关者的反馈在所有调查方面都一致是积极的。结论:该远程项目结合了异步和同步的组成部分以及国际和专业间的合作,有效地解决了21世纪临床研究人员核心能力培养的差距。该课程的实施有可能提高印度理工学院的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
The induction process of new professionals in the Swedish ambulance service - a document analysis. Comparing medical school strategies to reduce regional physician shortages: lessons from the United States and Japan. An integrated teaching model combining PBL and medical humanities education for pathology laboratory teaching: a randomized controlled study. "Building the boat while sailing" - adapting towards telementoring literacy. Impact of a vertically integrated, symptom-oriented teaching program for hematuria management on clinical competency transfer among urology clerkship students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1