Tolebrutinib versus Teriflunomide in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 78.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2415985
Jiwon Oh, Douglas L Arnold, Bruce A C Cree, Carolina Ionete, Ho Jin Kim, Maria Pia Sormani, Sana Syed, Yixin Chen, Christina R Maxwell, Patrick Benoit, Timothy J Turner, Erik Wallstroem, Heinz Wiendl
{"title":"Tolebrutinib versus Teriflunomide in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Jiwon Oh, Douglas L Arnold, Bruce A C Cree, Carolina Ionete, Ho Jin Kim, Maria Pia Sormani, Sana Syed, Yixin Chen, Christina R Maxwell, Patrick Benoit, Timothy J Turner, Erik Wallstroem, Heinz Wiendl","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2415985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tolebrutinib is an oral, brain-penetrant, and bioactive Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that modulates peripheral inflammation and persistent immune activation within the central nervous system, including disease-associated microglia and B cells. More data are needed on its efficacy and safety in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trials (GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2), participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tolebrutinib (60 mg once daily) or teriflunomide (14 mg once daily), each with matching placebo. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. The key secondary end point was confirmed worsening of disability that was sustained for at least 6 months, which was assessed in a time-to-event analysis that was pooled across trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 974 participants were enrolled in GEMINI 1, and 899 were enrolled in GEMINI 2. The median follow-up was 139 weeks. The annualized relapse rate in the tolebrutinib and teriflunomide groups was 0.13 and 0.12, respectively, in GEMINI 1 (rate ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.39; P = 0.67) and 0.11 and 0.11, respectively, in GEMINI 2 (rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.32; P = 0.98). The pooled percentage of participants with confirmed disability worsening sustained for at least 6 months was 8.3% with tolebrutinib and 11.3% with teriflunomide (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.95; no formal hypothesis testing was conducted owing to the prespecified hierarchical testing plan, and the width of the confidence interval is not adjusted for multiple testing). The percentage of participants who had adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups, although the percentage with minor bleeding was higher in the tolebrutinib group than in the teriflunomide group (petechiae occurred in 4.5% vs. 0.3%, and heavy menses in 2.6% vs. 1.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tolebrutinib was not superior to teriflunomide in decreasing annualized relapse rates among participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis. (Funded by Sanofi; GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04410978 and NCT04410991, respectively.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1893-1904"},"PeriodicalIF":78.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2415985","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tolebrutinib is an oral, brain-penetrant, and bioactive Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that modulates peripheral inflammation and persistent immune activation within the central nervous system, including disease-associated microglia and B cells. More data are needed on its efficacy and safety in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Methods: In two phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trials (GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2), participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tolebrutinib (60 mg once daily) or teriflunomide (14 mg once daily), each with matching placebo. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. The key secondary end point was confirmed worsening of disability that was sustained for at least 6 months, which was assessed in a time-to-event analysis that was pooled across trials.

Results: A total of 974 participants were enrolled in GEMINI 1, and 899 were enrolled in GEMINI 2. The median follow-up was 139 weeks. The annualized relapse rate in the tolebrutinib and teriflunomide groups was 0.13 and 0.12, respectively, in GEMINI 1 (rate ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.39; P = 0.67) and 0.11 and 0.11, respectively, in GEMINI 2 (rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.32; P = 0.98). The pooled percentage of participants with confirmed disability worsening sustained for at least 6 months was 8.3% with tolebrutinib and 11.3% with teriflunomide (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.95; no formal hypothesis testing was conducted owing to the prespecified hierarchical testing plan, and the width of the confidence interval is not adjusted for multiple testing). The percentage of participants who had adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups, although the percentage with minor bleeding was higher in the tolebrutinib group than in the teriflunomide group (petechiae occurred in 4.5% vs. 0.3%, and heavy menses in 2.6% vs. 1.0%).

Conclusions: Tolebrutinib was not superior to teriflunomide in decreasing annualized relapse rates among participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis. (Funded by Sanofi; GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04410978 and NCT04410991, respectively.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托勒布替尼与特立氟米特治疗复发性多发性硬化症。
背景:托勒布替尼是一种口服、脑渗透、生物活性的布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,可调节外周炎症和中枢神经系统内的持续免疫激活,包括疾病相关的小胶质细胞和B细胞。其治疗复发性多发性硬化症的有效性和安全性需要更多的数据。方法:在两项3期、双盲、双虚拟、事件驱动的试验(GEMINI 1和GEMINI 2)中,复发性多发性硬化症患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受托勒布替尼(60mg每日一次)或特立氟米特(14mg每日一次)治疗,每一组与安慰剂相匹配。主要终点为年复发率。关键的次要终点是确认残疾恶化,持续至少6个月,这是在一个事件时间分析中评估的,该分析汇集了所有试验。结果:共有974名参与者参加了GEMINI 1, 899名参与者参加了GEMINI 2。中位随访时间为139周。在GEMINI 1中,托勒布替尼组和特立氟米特组的年复发率分别为0.13和0.12(比率比为1.06;95%置信区间[CI], 0.81 ~ 1.39;P = 0.67), GEMINI 2组分别为0.11和0.11(比率比1.00;95% CI, 0.75 ~ 1.32;p = 0.98)。确认残疾恶化持续至少6个月的参与者的总百分比为:托勒布替尼组为8.3%,特立氟米特组为11.3%(风险比,0.71;95% CI, 0.53 ~ 0.95;由于预先设定了分层检验计划,因此没有进行正式的假设检验,并且没有对多重检验调整置信区间的宽度)。两个治疗组中出现不良事件的参与者比例相似,尽管托勒布替尼组出现轻微出血的比例高于特立氟米特组(出现瘀点的比例为4.5%比0.3%,大量月经的比例为2.6%比1.0%)。结论:托勒布替尼在降低复发性多发性硬化症患者的年复发率方面并不优于特立氟米特。(由赛诺菲投资;GEMINI 1和GEMINI 2 ClinicalTrials.gov编号分别为NCT04410978和NCT04410991)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Tuberculosis Cases and Deaths Averted by PEPFAR. Playing Favorites - State Protection of Academic Medical Centers from Antitrust Oversight. Communicating about Vaccines in a Politically Contentious Climate. Conflicts of Interest in Advisory Committees - Facts, Fallacies, and the Limits of Reform. Number Needed to Treat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1