Joona Nieminen, Alma Liukkonen, Anni Valassaari, Arto Pihlajamäki, Mika Mänttäri
{"title":"Coatings for protecting cellulosic ultrafiltration membranes from degradation during humic surface water purification","authors":"Joona Nieminen, Alma Liukkonen, Anni Valassaari, Arto Pihlajamäki, Mika Mänttäri","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improvement of cellulosic ultrafiltration membrane durability was studied. With no protective modifications, the commercial regenerated cellulose membrane showed notable signs of degradation when in contact with lake water for several days. The most evident signs of degradation were increasing permeate fluxes and decreasing model substance retentions. Differing degrees of protection were achieved through TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) −mediated oxidation of the membranes and charge-adhered coatings. Mere TEMPO-oxidation and consecutive coating with either poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate) (PDADMAC/PSS) or microfibrillar cellulose slightly improved the durability, whereas the poly(vinyl amine)/poly(acrylic acid) (PVAm/PAA) coating system made the membrane stable enough that no signs of degradation were observed during the testing period. The performed modifications did not alter the substrate membrane filtration properties significantly. The most notable changes were attributed to the [PVAm/PAA]<sub>1</sub> coating that reduced both pure water permeance and molecular weight cut-off value by approximately 10%. It is suggested that the [PVAm/PAA]<sub>1</sub> coating was sufficiently tight to block the cellulose-degrading substances that were present. Nevertheless, the structure was loose enough to sustain the desired properties of the substrate membrane. In concentrating filtrations, said coating mitigated flux decrease and the coated membrane ultimately had better filtration capacity than the non-coated alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"368 ","pages":"Article 132866"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586625014637","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Improvement of cellulosic ultrafiltration membrane durability was studied. With no protective modifications, the commercial regenerated cellulose membrane showed notable signs of degradation when in contact with lake water for several days. The most evident signs of degradation were increasing permeate fluxes and decreasing model substance retentions. Differing degrees of protection were achieved through TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) −mediated oxidation of the membranes and charge-adhered coatings. Mere TEMPO-oxidation and consecutive coating with either poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate) (PDADMAC/PSS) or microfibrillar cellulose slightly improved the durability, whereas the poly(vinyl amine)/poly(acrylic acid) (PVAm/PAA) coating system made the membrane stable enough that no signs of degradation were observed during the testing period. The performed modifications did not alter the substrate membrane filtration properties significantly. The most notable changes were attributed to the [PVAm/PAA]1 coating that reduced both pure water permeance and molecular weight cut-off value by approximately 10%. It is suggested that the [PVAm/PAA]1 coating was sufficiently tight to block the cellulose-degrading substances that were present. Nevertheless, the structure was loose enough to sustain the desired properties of the substrate membrane. In concentrating filtrations, said coating mitigated flux decrease and the coated membrane ultimately had better filtration capacity than the non-coated alternatives.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.