Does having someone to confide in affect mortality in older adults? a prospective cohort study from 2008 to 2018

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatric Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.03.031
Chang Sun M.Med. ((Nursing) Candidate) , Dijuan Meng Ph.D. , Liping Wang Ph.D. , Meng Jin M.Med. ((Nursing) Candidate) , Qinan Shen M.Med. ((Nursing) Candidate) , Shanshan Wang Ph.D. , Guihua Xu Ph.D. , Yamei Bai Ph.D.
{"title":"Does having someone to confide in affect mortality in older adults? a prospective cohort study from 2008 to 2018","authors":"Chang Sun M.Med. ((Nursing) Candidate) ,&nbsp;Dijuan Meng Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Liping Wang Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Meng Jin M.Med. ((Nursing) Candidate) ,&nbsp;Qinan Shen M.Med. ((Nursing) Candidate) ,&nbsp;Shanshan Wang Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Guihua Xu Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yamei Bai Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.03.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our study investigated the association between confidant networks and mortality among older Chinese adults, focusing on the impact of the absence, types, and size of the networks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective cohort study included 11,930 participants aged over 65 from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 2008 to 2018. Cox proportional hazards models were employed for analysis, supplemented by subgroup and interaction analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants without confidant networks had higher mortality (HR=1.194, 95% CI 1.097–1.300) after adjusting for confounders. A dose-response relationship was observed between the size of confidant networks and mortality. Notably, having a spouse as a confidant was strongly associated with decreased mortality (HR=0.765, 95% CI 0.677–0.865), whereas having formal helpers as confidants did not significantly affect mortality (HR=0.813, 95% CI 0.636–1.040).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Identifying and supporting older adults without confidant networks is crucial for enabling them to benefit from these networks and potentially enhance their longevity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":"63 ","pages":"Pages 250-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457225001296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Our study investigated the association between confidant networks and mortality among older Chinese adults, focusing on the impact of the absence, types, and size of the networks.

Methods

A prospective cohort study included 11,930 participants aged over 65 from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 2008 to 2018. Cox proportional hazards models were employed for analysis, supplemented by subgroup and interaction analyses.

Results

Participants without confidant networks had higher mortality (HR=1.194, 95% CI 1.097–1.300) after adjusting for confounders. A dose-response relationship was observed between the size of confidant networks and mortality. Notably, having a spouse as a confidant was strongly associated with decreased mortality (HR=0.765, 95% CI 0.677–0.865), whereas having formal helpers as confidants did not significantly affect mortality (HR=0.813, 95% CI 0.636–1.040).

Conclusion

Identifying and supporting older adults without confidant networks is crucial for enabling them to benefit from these networks and potentially enhance their longevity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有倾诉对象会影响老年人的死亡率吗?2008年至2018年的前瞻性队列研究
目的研究中国老年人知己网络与死亡率之间的关系,重点研究知己网络缺失、知己网络类型和知己网络规模的影响。方法一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了2008 - 2018年中国纵向健康寿命调查(CLHLS)中11930名65岁以上的参与者。采用Cox比例风险模型进行分析,并辅以亚组分析和相互作用分析。结果调整混杂因素后,无知己网络的参与者死亡率较高(HR=1.194, 95% CI 1.097 ~ 1.300)。在知己网络的大小和死亡率之间观察到剂量-反应关系。值得注意的是,有配偶作为知己与死亡率降低密切相关(HR=0.765, 95% CI 0.677-0.865),而有正式助手作为知己对死亡率没有显著影响(HR=0.813, 95% CI 0.636-1.040)。结论识别和支持没有知己网络的老年人对于使他们从这些网络中受益并潜在地延长寿命至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatric Nursing
Geriatric Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a social isolation assessment scale for older adults with chronic diseases Development of a dual task interference assessment tool: evaluating test-retest reliability and concurrent validity in community-dwelling older adults Table of Contents Editorial Board Connect, learn, and advance geriatrics together at #AGS26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1