Comparative investigation on heat pump solutions for peak shaving and heat-power decoupling in combined heat and power plants

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115703
Zhenpu Wang , Jing Xu , Suxia Ma , Guanjia Zhao , Jianfei Wang , Yujiong Gu
{"title":"Comparative investigation on heat pump solutions for peak shaving and heat-power decoupling in combined heat and power plants","authors":"Zhenpu Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Xu ,&nbsp;Suxia Ma ,&nbsp;Guanjia Zhao ,&nbsp;Jianfei Wang ,&nbsp;Yujiong Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One pressing concern for coal-fired power plants is the retrofitting of heating supply, as central heating demand continues to rise, and carbon emission reduction becomes a priority. However, the cogeneration of heat and power leads to unwanted heat-power coupling and restricts the power peak-shaving flexibility. In this study, heat pump (HP) is used in designing highly efficient and heat-power decoupling retrofit systems. Three retrofit cases integrating absorption heat pump (AHP) and electric heat pump (EHP) are proposed. Their energy utilization efficiency, exergy efficiency, coal consumption rate of power generation with varying operating conditions, and heat-power decoupling characteristics are compared. Moreover, the techno-economic considering the repayment time and the benefits of peak shaving in the retrofit cases is investigated. A 600 MW coal-fired power plant is studied. Results show that three retrofit cases can enhance the heating capacity and achieve heat-power decoupling. The EHP-CHP system has the largest heating capacity of 1049 MW and the minimum power load of 150 MW at the heating load of 546 MW. In contrast, the AHP-CHP system can only decrease the minimum power load to 300 MW. The EHP-CHP coupled with the extracted exhaust steam system shows the highest energy utilization efficiency of 90.46 % at the maximum heating capacity, with the lowest coal consumption rate of power generation of 141.96 g (kW h)<sup>−1</sup> under 50 % THA, which is lower than the 153.27 g (kW h)<sup>−1</sup> the EHP-CHP system. However, the utilization of EHP decreases the exergy efficiency compared to AHP. The AHP-CHP system provides a maximum exergy efficiency of 36.46 % under the design heating load. In addition, the EHP-CHP coupled with the extracted exhaust steam retrofit case leads to a short repayment time of only 1.9 years. The EHP-CHP coupled with exhaust steam system proves to be a preferable energy-efficient, heat-power decoupling, and economic benefit-favorable solution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"216 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One pressing concern for coal-fired power plants is the retrofitting of heating supply, as central heating demand continues to rise, and carbon emission reduction becomes a priority. However, the cogeneration of heat and power leads to unwanted heat-power coupling and restricts the power peak-shaving flexibility. In this study, heat pump (HP) is used in designing highly efficient and heat-power decoupling retrofit systems. Three retrofit cases integrating absorption heat pump (AHP) and electric heat pump (EHP) are proposed. Their energy utilization efficiency, exergy efficiency, coal consumption rate of power generation with varying operating conditions, and heat-power decoupling characteristics are compared. Moreover, the techno-economic considering the repayment time and the benefits of peak shaving in the retrofit cases is investigated. A 600 MW coal-fired power plant is studied. Results show that three retrofit cases can enhance the heating capacity and achieve heat-power decoupling. The EHP-CHP system has the largest heating capacity of 1049 MW and the minimum power load of 150 MW at the heating load of 546 MW. In contrast, the AHP-CHP system can only decrease the minimum power load to 300 MW. The EHP-CHP coupled with the extracted exhaust steam system shows the highest energy utilization efficiency of 90.46 % at the maximum heating capacity, with the lowest coal consumption rate of power generation of 141.96 g (kW h)−1 under 50 % THA, which is lower than the 153.27 g (kW h)−1 the EHP-CHP system. However, the utilization of EHP decreases the exergy efficiency compared to AHP. The AHP-CHP system provides a maximum exergy efficiency of 36.46 % under the design heating load. In addition, the EHP-CHP coupled with the extracted exhaust steam retrofit case leads to a short repayment time of only 1.9 years. The EHP-CHP coupled with exhaust steam system proves to be a preferable energy-efficient, heat-power decoupling, and economic benefit-favorable solution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热电联产调峰与热电解耦热泵解决方案的比较研究
燃煤电厂面临的一个紧迫问题是供暖系统的改造,因为集中供暖需求持续上升,减少碳排放成为当务之急。然而,热电联产导致了不必要的热电耦合,限制了电力调峰的灵活性。在本研究中,热泵(HP)被用于设计高效和热功率解耦改造系统。提出了吸收式热泵(AHP)与电热泵(EHP)相结合的三种改造方案。比较了不同工况下的能源利用效率、火用效率、发电煤耗率以及热电解耦特性。此外,还研究了考虑还款时间和调峰效益的技术经济问题。对一座600mw燃煤电厂进行了研究。结果表明,三种改造方案均能提高供热能力,实现热电解耦。热电联产系统供热负荷为546 MW时,最大供热容量为1049 MW,最小负荷为150 MW。相比之下,AHP-CHP系统只能将最小功率负荷降低到300兆瓦。在最大供热容量下,热电联产系统的能源利用效率最高,为90.46%;在50% THA下,发电煤耗最低,为141.96 g (kW h)−1,低于热电联产系统的153.27 g (kW h)−1。然而,与AHP相比,EHP的利用降低了火用效率。在设计热负荷下,AHP-CHP系统的最大火用效率为36.46%。此外,EHP-CHP加上抽汽改造的情况下,还款时间很短,只有1.9年。高压热电联产与排汽联产是一种较好的节能、热电解耦和经济效益较好的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Collective decision-making in energy transitions: A systematic review and a way forward Advancements in superstructures design and solver approaches for heat and mass exchange network synthesis Recent advances for thermal management of electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review A state-of-the-art review on decarbonizing aerospace manufacturing with life cycle sustainability assessment Power-to-protein: Convergent carbon capture, renewable energy, and microbial biomanufacturing for sustainable food security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1