Vertical distribution of microplastics in soil affects plant response to microplastics.

IF 5.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES NanoImpact Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.impact.2025.100557
Merve Tunali , Matthias C. Rillig
{"title":"Vertical distribution of microplastics in soil affects plant response to microplastics.","authors":"Merve Tunali ,&nbsp;Matthias C. Rillig","doi":"10.1016/j.impact.2025.100557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impacts of microplastics on plants have been extensively researched, yielding a variety of responses: promoting growth, limiting growth, or causing no change in plants. Experimental studies, following basic principles of ecotoxicology, typically use a homogeneous distribution of microplastics in soils, where soil and microplastic are well-mixed. However, in the environment, plastic is not homogeneously distributed. Therefore, we tested whether the distribution of microplastics in soils affects the impact observed on plants. For this purpose, we tested the effect of homogeneously distributed microplastics and heterogeneously distributed microplastics (at different levels) on the growth of spring onions. In addition, the presence of drought was also included in our greenhouse experiment. The results show that the distribution of microplastics (whether it is homogeneous or heterogeneous) affects the growth of spring onions differently, especially the shoot and root mass. First, differences of 21–22 % in shoot mass and 29–38 % in root mass were observed between heterogeneously distributed treatments and the homogeneous treatment. Second, under drought conditions, the effects -particularly on shoot mass and the C:N (carbon:nitrogen) ratio- may differ compared to non-drought. Differences of 30–37 % in shoot mass, and up to 16 % in the carbon/nitrogen ratio were observed between different heterogeneously distributed treatments and the homogeneous treatment in the drought case. In addition, shoot mass and the C:N ratio varied depending on drought conditions. Our results strongly suggest that future experiments on microplastic effects in soil should consider at least vertically heterogeneity of the pollutant to arrive at more realistic effect estimates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18786,"journal":{"name":"NanoImpact","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100557"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NanoImpact","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452074825000175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impacts of microplastics on plants have been extensively researched, yielding a variety of responses: promoting growth, limiting growth, or causing no change in plants. Experimental studies, following basic principles of ecotoxicology, typically use a homogeneous distribution of microplastics in soils, where soil and microplastic are well-mixed. However, in the environment, plastic is not homogeneously distributed. Therefore, we tested whether the distribution of microplastics in soils affects the impact observed on plants. For this purpose, we tested the effect of homogeneously distributed microplastics and heterogeneously distributed microplastics (at different levels) on the growth of spring onions. In addition, the presence of drought was also included in our greenhouse experiment. The results show that the distribution of microplastics (whether it is homogeneous or heterogeneous) affects the growth of spring onions differently, especially the shoot and root mass. First, differences of 21–22 % in shoot mass and 29–38 % in root mass were observed between heterogeneously distributed treatments and the homogeneous treatment. Second, under drought conditions, the effects -particularly on shoot mass and the C:N (carbon:nitrogen) ratio- may differ compared to non-drought. Differences of 30–37 % in shoot mass, and up to 16 % in the carbon/nitrogen ratio were observed between different heterogeneously distributed treatments and the homogeneous treatment in the drought case. In addition, shoot mass and the C:N ratio varied depending on drought conditions. Our results strongly suggest that future experiments on microplastic effects in soil should consider at least vertically heterogeneity of the pollutant to arrive at more realistic effect estimates.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤中微塑料的垂直分布会影响植物对微塑料的反应。
微塑料对植物的影响已得到广泛研究,并产生了多种反应:促进生长、限制生长或对植物无影响。实验研究遵循生态毒理学的基本原则,通常使用土壤中微塑料的均匀分布,即土壤和微塑料充分混合。然而,在环境中,塑料的分布并不均匀。因此,我们测试了微塑料在土壤中的分布是否会影响对植物的影响。为此,我们测试了均质分布的微塑料和异质分布的微塑料(不同含量)对葱生长的影响。此外,我们还在温室实验中加入了干旱因素。结果表明,微塑料的分布(无论是均质分布还是异质分布)对葱的生长,特别是芽和根的质量有不同的影响。首先,在异质分布处理和均质分布处理之间,观察到葱的芽和根的质量分别相差 21-22% 和 29-38%。其次,在干旱条件下,与非干旱条件下相比,其影响(尤其是对芽的质量和碳氮比的影响)可能有所不同。在干旱情况下,不同的异质分布处理与均质处理之间的芽体质量差异达 30-37%,碳氮比差异达 16%。此外,嫩枝质量和碳氮比也因干旱条件而异。我们的研究结果强烈建议,未来有关土壤中微塑料效应的实验至少应考虑污染物的垂直异质性,以得出更真实的效应估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NanoImpact
NanoImpact Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: NanoImpact is a multidisciplinary journal that focuses on nanosafety research and areas related to the impacts of manufactured nanomaterials on human and environmental systems and the behavior of nanomaterials in these systems.
期刊最新文献
Dustiness and aerosol characteristics of nanocellulose powders: Implications for workplace exposure and safety management. Maize adaptation to low-dose nanoplastic–lead co-contamination: Foliar metabolic reprogramming and phyllospheric microbiome restructuring The legacy in nanosafety research and future perspectives. Impact of titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide nanoparticle mixtures on the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata Microplastic pollution in rivers and lakes of India: Sources, ecotoxicological impacts, and removal strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1