Unveiling users’ algorithm trust: The role of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100667
Ruoxin Yang , Sisheng Li , Yawei Qi , Jiali Liu , Qinghua He , Haichao Zhao
{"title":"Unveiling users’ algorithm trust: The role of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load","authors":"Ruoxin Yang ,&nbsp;Sisheng Li ,&nbsp;Yawei Qi ,&nbsp;Jiali Liu ,&nbsp;Qinghua He ,&nbsp;Haichao Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of artificial intelligence and algorithm-assisted decision-making, understanding dynamics of users' trust in algorithms and its influencing factors is crucial for optimizing human-computer interactions. This study integrates both questionnaires and behavioral experiments to explore the effects of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load on algorithm trust. Study 1 recruited 488 participants to evaluate the perceived objectivity of 24 algorithm-estimated tasks, and revealed a significant positive correlation between perceived task objectivity and algorithm trust. Using a weight estimation task selected by study 1, which was identified as high objectivity and comparable trust in human versus algorithmic decisions, study 2 investigated the algorithm trust of 51 college students under different cognitive loads and time pressures. Results showed that individuals' trust in algorithms increased under time pressure in objective practical choices but significantly decreased in subjective rating afterward. Cognitive load, however, did not significantly impact individual's advice adoption. Study 3 (n = 54) further validated the crucial role of time pressure in shaping algorithm trust and its dynamical changes over time. The study underscored the importance of task objectivity and time pressure on users' algorithm trust, unveiling the cogntive mechamism of task characteristics and contextual factors impacting on the users' alogrithm trust, which provided a theoretical foundation for developers optimize algorithm interaction designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100667"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245195882500082X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of artificial intelligence and algorithm-assisted decision-making, understanding dynamics of users' trust in algorithms and its influencing factors is crucial for optimizing human-computer interactions. This study integrates both questionnaires and behavioral experiments to explore the effects of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load on algorithm trust. Study 1 recruited 488 participants to evaluate the perceived objectivity of 24 algorithm-estimated tasks, and revealed a significant positive correlation between perceived task objectivity and algorithm trust. Using a weight estimation task selected by study 1, which was identified as high objectivity and comparable trust in human versus algorithmic decisions, study 2 investigated the algorithm trust of 51 college students under different cognitive loads and time pressures. Results showed that individuals' trust in algorithms increased under time pressure in objective practical choices but significantly decreased in subjective rating afterward. Cognitive load, however, did not significantly impact individual's advice adoption. Study 3 (n = 54) further validated the crucial role of time pressure in shaping algorithm trust and its dynamical changes over time. The study underscored the importance of task objectivity and time pressure on users' algorithm trust, unveiling the cogntive mechamism of task characteristics and contextual factors impacting on the users' alogrithm trust, which provided a theoretical foundation for developers optimize algorithm interaction designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示用户对算法的信任:任务客观性、时间压力和认知负荷的作用
在人工智能和算法辅助决策的背景下,了解用户对算法的信任动态及其影响因素对于优化人机交互至关重要。本研究采用问卷调查和行为实验相结合的方法,探讨任务客观性、时间压力和认知负荷对算法信任的影响。研究1招募了488名参与者,对24项算法估计任务的感知客观性进行了评估,结果显示任务客观性感知与算法信任之间存在显著的正相关关系。研究2采用研究1所选择的权重估计任务,对不同认知负荷和时间压力下51名大学生的算法信任进行了调查,该任务被认为在人与算法决策中具有高度客观性和可比性。结果表明,在时间压力下,个体对算法的信任在客观实际选择中增加,但在主观选择后显著降低。认知负荷对建议采纳的影响不显著。研究3 (n = 54)进一步验证了时间压力在形成算法信任中的关键作用及其随时间的动态变化。本研究强调了任务客观性和时间压力对用户算法信任的重要性,揭示了任务特征和情境因素对用户算法信任影响的认知机制,为开发者优化算法交互设计提供了理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stability through human perception: Technology acceptance models’ robustness across various interaction perspectives and comparable technologies The moderating effects of executive functions: A multi-level analysis of daily stress and problematic social media use Cultivating iranian EFL learners’ grammatical knowledge through online cumulative group-dynamic assessment Do individuals with autism spectrum disorder not experience the uncanny valley? A psychological experiment and feature analysis using human and robot faces Modeling financial literacy through explainable machine learning and behavioral segmentation in emerging economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1