Selling Products in the E-Marketplace: Do Fairness Concerns Matter for the Deployment of Product Visualization Tools?

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2025.3553124
Jianing Zhang;Bin Shen
{"title":"Selling Products in the E-Marketplace: Do Fairness Concerns Matter for the Deployment of Product Visualization Tools?","authors":"Jianing Zhang;Bin Shen","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3553124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deploying product visualization tools (PVTs) can reduce consumers’ product fit uncertainty in e-marketplaces. This article examines the impact of PVTs on selling products. Consumers are fairness-minded. We develop a game-theoretical framework and find that PVTs can be deployed when consumer fairness concerns are relatively weak. Highly precise PVTs can facilitate an all-win outcome for the supplier, retailer, and consumers if the product has low quality. Such an all-win outcome may also be achieved if product quality is higher than a certain level and the degree of product visualization precision is relatively low. We find that the region of an all-win outcome of deploying PVTs will expand with decreased degree of consumer fairness concerns. Thus, consumer fairness concerns are advised to be measured when deploying PVTs in e-marketplaces. Moreover, demand will decrease if product quality and the degree of product visualization precision are high. Consequently, an all-lose outcome for the supplier, retailer, and consumers will occur. Thus, deploying PVTs for high-quality products is not wise when the degree of product visualization precision is relatively high. This article provides managerial insights into the optimal strategy for deploying PVTs in e-marketplaces when selling to fairness-minded consumers.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1195-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10937361/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deploying product visualization tools (PVTs) can reduce consumers’ product fit uncertainty in e-marketplaces. This article examines the impact of PVTs on selling products. Consumers are fairness-minded. We develop a game-theoretical framework and find that PVTs can be deployed when consumer fairness concerns are relatively weak. Highly precise PVTs can facilitate an all-win outcome for the supplier, retailer, and consumers if the product has low quality. Such an all-win outcome may also be achieved if product quality is higher than a certain level and the degree of product visualization precision is relatively low. We find that the region of an all-win outcome of deploying PVTs will expand with decreased degree of consumer fairness concerns. Thus, consumer fairness concerns are advised to be measured when deploying PVTs in e-marketplaces. Moreover, demand will decrease if product quality and the degree of product visualization precision are high. Consequently, an all-lose outcome for the supplier, retailer, and consumers will occur. Thus, deploying PVTs for high-quality products is not wise when the degree of product visualization precision is relatively high. This article provides managerial insights into the optimal strategy for deploying PVTs in e-marketplaces when selling to fairness-minded consumers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在电子市场上销售产品:公平性对产品可视化工具的部署是否重要?
利用产品可视化工具(pvt)可以减少消费者在电子市场中产品匹配的不确定性。本文探讨了pvt对销售产品的影响。消费者是公平的。我们开发了一个博弈论框架,并发现当消费者对公平的关注相对较弱时,可以部署pvt。如果产品质量较低,高精度的pvt可以促进供应商,零售商和消费者的三赢结果。如果产品质量高于一定水平,产品可视化精度程度相对较低,也可以实现这种双赢的结果。我们发现,随着消费者对公平的关注程度的降低,部署pvt的多赢结果的区域将扩大。因此,建议在电子市场中部署pvt时衡量消费者公平问题。此外,如果产品质量和产品可视化精度高,需求就会减少。因此,供应商、零售商和消费者都将蒙受损失。因此,当产品可视化精度相对较高时,为高质量产品部署pvt是不明智的。本文提供了管理方面的见解,以了解在电子市场中向具有公平意识的消费者销售产品时部署pvt的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Managing Transparency: ESG Disclosure and Firm Performance Launch Strategy for Green Innovative Products Considering Recall Risk: Timing and Product Portfolio Decisions Information Provision Strategy of Retailers Under Consumer Reference-Dependent Behavior Drivers of Social Media Engagement on Organizational Communication on Sustainable Technological Innovation: Insights From Developed and Developing Countries Implications of Quality Discrimination in Multiplayer Games: The Role of Social Comparison Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1