Comparison of Realistic and Slit Models of Activated Carbon for Xe/Kr Separation

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00118
Xuan Peng
{"title":"Comparison of Realistic and Slit Models of Activated Carbon for Xe/Kr Separation","authors":"Xuan Peng","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the adsorption and separation performance of Xe/Kr mixtures in realistic and slit pore models of activated carbon using Grand Canonical Ensemble Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations. The hybrid Reverse Monte Carlo (HRMC) model and slit pore structures exhibit distinct adsorption behaviors influenced by pore size, pressure, and temperature. For pure Xe and Kr, adsorption heats in the HRMC model range from 12 to 20 kJ/mol for Kr and 15 to 25 kJ/mol for Xe. At 1 MPa, cs1000a achieves the highest adsorption capacities for Kr and Xe, 1.93 and 3.84 mmol/g, respectively. In slit pores, the Xe/Kr selectivity peaks at 32 for 0.8 nm pores at 0.1 MPa and decreases with pressure and pore size. The 1.1 nm slit pore at 1.0 MPa and 238 K achieves a maximum Xe adsorption capacity and selectivity of 14. Local density analyses confirm selective Xe adsorption in narrow pores, with enhanced multilayer adsorption in larger pores. Compared to the HRMC model, slit pores exhibit higher adsorption heat and steeper isotherms, indicating stronger interactions. This study highlights the importance of pore structure in designing activated carbons for Xe/Kr separation, recommending operating conditions of 1.1 nm pore width, 238 K, and 1.0 MPa for optimal separation performance.","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares the adsorption and separation performance of Xe/Kr mixtures in realistic and slit pore models of activated carbon using Grand Canonical Ensemble Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations. The hybrid Reverse Monte Carlo (HRMC) model and slit pore structures exhibit distinct adsorption behaviors influenced by pore size, pressure, and temperature. For pure Xe and Kr, adsorption heats in the HRMC model range from 12 to 20 kJ/mol for Kr and 15 to 25 kJ/mol for Xe. At 1 MPa, cs1000a achieves the highest adsorption capacities for Kr and Xe, 1.93 and 3.84 mmol/g, respectively. In slit pores, the Xe/Kr selectivity peaks at 32 for 0.8 nm pores at 0.1 MPa and decreases with pressure and pore size. The 1.1 nm slit pore at 1.0 MPa and 238 K achieves a maximum Xe adsorption capacity and selectivity of 14. Local density analyses confirm selective Xe adsorption in narrow pores, with enhanced multilayer adsorption in larger pores. Compared to the HRMC model, slit pores exhibit higher adsorption heat and steeper isotherms, indicating stronger interactions. This study highlights the importance of pore structure in designing activated carbons for Xe/Kr separation, recommending operating conditions of 1.1 nm pore width, 238 K, and 1.0 MPa for optimal separation performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活性炭分离Xe/Kr的现实模型与狭缝模型的比较
本文采用大正则系综蒙特卡罗(GCMC)模拟方法,比较了Xe/Kr混合物在真实和狭缝孔活性炭模型中的吸附和分离性能。混合反蒙特卡罗(HRMC)模型和狭缝孔结构在孔径、压力和温度的影响下表现出不同的吸附行为。对于纯Xe和Kr, HRMC模型中Kr的吸附热为12 ~ 20kj /mol, Xe的吸附热为15 ~ 25kj /mol。在1 MPa时,cs1000a对Kr和Xe的吸附量最高,分别为1.93和3.84 mmol/g。在狭缝孔隙中,当压力为0.1 MPa时,0.8 nm孔隙的Xe/Kr选择性达到32,随压力和孔径的增大而降低。在1.0 MPa和238 K条件下,1.1 nm的狭缝孔的最大Xe吸附量和选择性为14。局部密度分析证实,在窄孔中Xe有选择性吸附,在大孔中多层吸附增强。与HRMC模型相比,狭缝孔隙表现出更高的吸附热和更陡的等温线,表明相互作用更强。本研究强调了孔隙结构在Xe/Kr分离活性炭设计中的重要性,推荐了1.1 nm孔径、238 K和1.0 MPa的操作条件,以获得最佳的分离性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
期刊最新文献
Achieving Precise Molecular Weight Distribution in Lauryl Acrylate Polymerization Using Helical Continuous-Flow Microreactor Technology Efficient Pb2+ Capture by Hierarchically Porous Boron Nitride-Doped Alginate Hydrogel Beads for Water Remediation Understanding and Predicting Bubble Growth in Bubbling Fluidized Beds via Physics-Aware Data-Driven Models Recyclable and Refoamable Zinc-Catalyzed Polyolefin Vitrimer Foams Modified by Epoxidized Soybean Oil with Tailorable Cellular Structure and Robust Mechanical Property Intensifying N2 Transport and Stabilizing Triple Phase Boundary via Introducing a Gas-Diffusion Electrode into a Photoelectrochemical Cell for Ammonia Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1