Jawad H. Butt, Pardeep S. Jhund, Alasdair D. Henderson, Brian L. Claggett, Akshay S. Desai, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Meike Brinker, Patrick Schloemer, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Andrea Lage, Katja Rohwedder, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J. Shah, Adriaan A. Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D. Solomon, John J.V. McMurray
{"title":"Finerenone, glycaemic status, and heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: A prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial","authors":"Jawad H. Butt, Pardeep S. Jhund, Alasdair D. Henderson, Brian L. Claggett, Akshay S. Desai, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Meike Brinker, Patrick Schloemer, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Andrea Lage, Katja Rohwedder, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J. Shah, Adriaan A. Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D. Solomon, John J.V. McMurray","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, have not been examined in patients without diabetes. We examined the efficacy and safety of finerenone, compared with placebo, according to glycaemic status in FINEARTS-HF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 6001 patients with heart failure (HF) with New York Heart Association functional class II–IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were randomized to finerenone or placebo. The effect of finerenone according to glycaemic status (i.e. normoglycaemia [no investigator-reported history of diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <5.7%], pre-diabetes [no investigator-reported history of diabetes and HbA1c 5.7–6.4%] and diabetes [investigator-reported history of diabetes or HbA1c ≥6.5%]) at baseline were examined. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. At baseline, 1243 (20.8%) patients were normoglycaemic, 1979 (33.1%) had pre-diabetes, and 2764 (46.2%) had diabetes. Compared with patients with normoglycaemia, those with diabetes, but not pre-diabetes, had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (normoglycaemia: reference; pre-diabetes: adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–1.23; diabetes: adjusted RR 1.32 [95% CI 1.11–1.58]). The benefit of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent across glycaemic status (normoglycaemia: RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.63–1.14]; pre-diabetes: RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66–1.08]; diabetes: RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.69–0.98]; <i>p</i><sub>interaction</sub> = 0.93). The effects of finerenone on the components of the primary outcome, all-cause death, composite kidney endpoints, and improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score were not modified by glycaemic status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with HF with mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction, the beneficial effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on clinical events and symptoms, were consistent, irrespective of glycaemic status at baseline.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"27 7","pages":"1326-1341"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.3649","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, have not been examined in patients without diabetes. We examined the efficacy and safety of finerenone, compared with placebo, according to glycaemic status in FINEARTS-HF.
Methods and results
A total of 6001 patients with heart failure (HF) with New York Heart Association functional class II–IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were randomized to finerenone or placebo. The effect of finerenone according to glycaemic status (i.e. normoglycaemia [no investigator-reported history of diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <5.7%], pre-diabetes [no investigator-reported history of diabetes and HbA1c 5.7–6.4%] and diabetes [investigator-reported history of diabetes or HbA1c ≥6.5%]) at baseline were examined. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. At baseline, 1243 (20.8%) patients were normoglycaemic, 1979 (33.1%) had pre-diabetes, and 2764 (46.2%) had diabetes. Compared with patients with normoglycaemia, those with diabetes, but not pre-diabetes, had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (normoglycaemia: reference; pre-diabetes: adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–1.23; diabetes: adjusted RR 1.32 [95% CI 1.11–1.58]). The benefit of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent across glycaemic status (normoglycaemia: RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.63–1.14]; pre-diabetes: RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66–1.08]; diabetes: RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.69–0.98]; pinteraction = 0.93). The effects of finerenone on the components of the primary outcome, all-cause death, composite kidney endpoints, and improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score were not modified by glycaemic status.
Conclusion
In patients with HF with mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction, the beneficial effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on clinical events and symptoms, were consistent, irrespective of glycaemic status at baseline.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.