In-depth analysis of solar desalination systems integrating heat storage and wick materials: A multi-dimensional evaluation

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Separation and Purification Technology Pub Date : 2025-09-17 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132978
Trinath Mahala, Naveen Sharma
{"title":"In-depth analysis of solar desalination systems integrating heat storage and wick materials: A multi-dimensional evaluation","authors":"Trinath Mahala,&nbsp;Naveen Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to improve the performance of both conventional (CPSD) and modified (MPSD) square pyramid solar distillers (SDs) by using heat storage materials like gravels (G), small gravels (Chips), black cotton cloth (C), and jute (J). The MPSD features fins and paraffin wax under the basin. Experiments were conducted in Greater Noida, India during October 2023, with six configurations: CPSD, MPSD, MPSD+G, MPSD+Chips, MPSD+G+C, and MPSD+G+J. The study assessed productivity, energy, exergy, economic, environmental, enviro-economic, and sustainability aspects. In first set of experiments, MPSD showed improvements in daily yield, energy and exergy efficiency by 13.51 %, 13.27 %, and 28.08 %, respectively, compared to CPSD. In second set of experiments, MPSD+G demonstrated superior performance over MPSD+Chips and MPSD. In third set of experiments, MPSD+G+C demonstrated superior performance compared to MPSD+G+J and MPSD+G. The enhancements in daily yield, energy, and exergy efficiency were 12.8 %, 19 %, and 27.07 % greater than MPSD+G, respectively. Compared to CPSD, MPSD+G+C achieved the highest energy and exergy improvements of 64 % and 172 %, respectively. The energy production factor for configurations ranged from 1.69 to 4.24 per year, with an energy payback period of 0.24–0.59 years. MPSD+G+C reduced the payback period and cost per liter by 26 %, enhanced enviro-economic parameters by 39.46 % compared to MPSD alone, and achieved a carbon mitigation of 15.53 tons. Exergetic sustainability of SDs is assessed through improvement potential, sustainability index, environmental effect factor, and waste exergy ratio. The findings indicate that cotton-based SDs achieve 8 % higher productivity than those using jute.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"368 ","pages":"Article 132978"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586625015758","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to improve the performance of both conventional (CPSD) and modified (MPSD) square pyramid solar distillers (SDs) by using heat storage materials like gravels (G), small gravels (Chips), black cotton cloth (C), and jute (J). The MPSD features fins and paraffin wax under the basin. Experiments were conducted in Greater Noida, India during October 2023, with six configurations: CPSD, MPSD, MPSD+G, MPSD+Chips, MPSD+G+C, and MPSD+G+J. The study assessed productivity, energy, exergy, economic, environmental, enviro-economic, and sustainability aspects. In first set of experiments, MPSD showed improvements in daily yield, energy and exergy efficiency by 13.51 %, 13.27 %, and 28.08 %, respectively, compared to CPSD. In second set of experiments, MPSD+G demonstrated superior performance over MPSD+Chips and MPSD. In third set of experiments, MPSD+G+C demonstrated superior performance compared to MPSD+G+J and MPSD+G. The enhancements in daily yield, energy, and exergy efficiency were 12.8 %, 19 %, and 27.07 % greater than MPSD+G, respectively. Compared to CPSD, MPSD+G+C achieved the highest energy and exergy improvements of 64 % and 172 %, respectively. The energy production factor for configurations ranged from 1.69 to 4.24 per year, with an energy payback period of 0.24–0.59 years. MPSD+G+C reduced the payback period and cost per liter by 26 %, enhanced enviro-economic parameters by 39.46 % compared to MPSD alone, and achieved a carbon mitigation of 15.53 tons. Exergetic sustainability of SDs is assessed through improvement potential, sustainability index, environmental effect factor, and waste exergy ratio. The findings indicate that cotton-based SDs achieve 8 % higher productivity than those using jute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深入分析集成了蓄热和灯芯材料的太阳能海水淡化系统:多维评估
本研究旨在通过使用砾石(G)、小砾石(Chips)、黑棉布(C)和黄麻(J)等储热材料来提高传统(CPSD)和改良(MPSD)方形金字塔太阳能蒸馏器(SDs)的性能。MPSD的特点是在盆下放置翅片和石蜡。实验于2023年10月在印度大诺伊达进行,共有CPSD、MPSD、MPSD+G、MPSD+Chips、MPSD+G+C和MPSD+G+J 6种配置。该研究评估了生产力、能源、能源、经济、环境、环境经济和可持续性等方面。在第一组试验中,与CPSD相比,MPSD的日产量、能量和火用效率分别提高了13.51 %、13.27 %和28.08 %。在第二组实验中,MPSD+G的性能优于MPSD+Chips和MPSD。在第三组实验中,MPSD+G+C比MPSD+G+J和MPSD+G表现出更好的性能。与MPSD+G相比,日产量、能量和火用效率分别提高12.8 %、19 %和27.07 %。与CPSD相比,MPSD+G+C实现了最高的能量和火用改善,分别为64% %和172 %。能源生产系数为1.69 ~ 4.24 /年,能源回收期为0.24 ~ 0.59 年。与单独使用MPSD相比,MPSD+G+C将投资回收期和每升成本降低了26% %,环境经济参数提高了39.46 %,并实现了15.53吨的碳减排。通过改进潜力、可持续性指数、环境影响因子和废物火用比评价SDs的火用可持续性。结果表明,棉基SDs比黄麻基SDs的生产率高出8 %。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Highly efficient degradation of tetracycline in water using low-cost pyrite activated periodate: Performance and mechanisms insight Semi-crystalline polymer-blend TFC membranes with enhanced mechanical robustness and mitigated PTMSP aging Molecular mechanisms and process intensification for green separation of the n-propanol/acetonitrile/water azeotrope via extractive pressure-swing distillation with thermal and membrane integration Biocompatible Cyclodextrin-based metal-organic frameworks for atmospheric water harvesting Research and development of eco-friendly high-temperature and salt-resistant filtrate reducers for minimizing drilling fluid loss and environmental pollution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1