Sell-by-plan mandate and opportunistic insider selling: Evidence from China

IF 6.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting & Economics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101757
Pengfei Ye , Qingsheng Zeng , Cheng Zhang
{"title":"Sell-by-plan mandate and opportunistic insider selling: Evidence from China","authors":"Pengfei Ye ,&nbsp;Qingsheng Zeng ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine whether requiring insiders to sell their stock shares based on pre-disclosed plans can mitigate opportunistic insider selling activities and, more importantly, to what extent insiders can circumvent this regulation. Using China's mandate enacted in 2017 as the setting, we demonstrate that a sell-by-plan mandate can reduce opportunistic selling activities. However, insiders can circumvent this mandate by strategically initiating their plans before bad news. We find that this gaming practice is widespread in China. It is concentrated in firms with weak governance but largely absent in firms with strong governance<strong>.</strong> We also find that China's stock market cannot discern whether a plan is opportunistically motivated upon its announcement. Overall, this paper highlights a new form of opportunism in insider trading—opportunistic planning—and proposes a method to identify such plans. Our results also suggest that government regulation, without strong governance, could be ineffective in curbing corporate executives' opportunistic behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting & Economics","volume":"79 2","pages":"Article 101757"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410124000879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine whether requiring insiders to sell their stock shares based on pre-disclosed plans can mitigate opportunistic insider selling activities and, more importantly, to what extent insiders can circumvent this regulation. Using China's mandate enacted in 2017 as the setting, we demonstrate that a sell-by-plan mandate can reduce opportunistic selling activities. However, insiders can circumvent this mandate by strategically initiating their plans before bad news. We find that this gaming practice is widespread in China. It is concentrated in firms with weak governance but largely absent in firms with strong governance. We also find that China's stock market cannot discern whether a plan is opportunistically motivated upon its announcement. Overall, this paper highlights a new form of opportunism in insider trading—opportunistic planning—and proposes a method to identify such plans. Our results also suggest that government regulation, without strong governance, could be ineffective in curbing corporate executives' opportunistic behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按计划出售授权和机会主义的内幕抛售:来自中国的证据
我们研究了要求内部人员根据预先披露的计划出售其股票是否可以减少机会主义的内部人员出售活动,更重要的是,内部人员可以在多大程度上规避这一规定。以中国2017年颁布的授权为背景,我们证明了按计划出售的授权可以减少投机买卖活动。然而,内部人士可以通过在坏消息之前战略性地启动他们的计划来规避这一要求。我们发现这种游戏行为在中国很普遍。它主要集中在治理薄弱的公司,而在治理强有力的公司则基本不存在。我们还发现,中国股市无法辨别一项计划是否出于机会主义动机。总之,本文强调了内幕交易中的一种新的机会主义形式——机会主义计划,并提出了一种识别这种计划的方法。我们的研究结果还表明,如果没有强有力的治理,政府监管在遏制企业高管机会主义行为方面可能是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Economics encourages the application of economic theory to the explanation of accounting phenomena. It provides a forum for the publication of the highest quality manuscripts which employ economic analyses of accounting problems. A wide range of methodologies and topics are encouraged and covered: * The role of accounting within the firm; * The information content and role of accounting numbers in capital markets; * The role of accounting in financial contracts and in monitoring agency relationships; * The determination of accounting standards; * Government regulation of corporate disclosure and/or the Accounting profession; * The theory of the accounting firm.
期刊最新文献
Do auditors understand the implications of ESG issues for their audits? Evidence from financially material negative ESG incidents Critical audit matters and internal control quality: The disciplining role of CAM reporting Does taxpayer assistance encourage entrepreneurship? Paying your fair share: Perceived fairness and tax compliance Carbon accounting quality: Measurement and the role of assurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1