Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with myeloid malignancies and cohesin mutations

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35846
Maria R. Khouri MD, Bofei Wang PhD, Laurie K. Pearson MD, Andrew J. Gillis-Smith MD, Sakiko Suzuki MD, Lloyd M. Hutchinson PhD, Poorva Bindal MD, Muthalagu Ramanathan MD, Jonathan M. Gerber MD, Jan Cerny MD, PhD, Shyam A. Patel MD, PhD
{"title":"Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with myeloid malignancies and cohesin mutations","authors":"Maria R. Khouri MD,&nbsp;Bofei Wang PhD,&nbsp;Laurie K. Pearson MD,&nbsp;Andrew J. Gillis-Smith MD,&nbsp;Sakiko Suzuki MD,&nbsp;Lloyd M. Hutchinson PhD,&nbsp;Poorva Bindal MD,&nbsp;Muthalagu Ramanathan MD,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Gerber MD,&nbsp;Jan Cerny MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shyam A. Patel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The prognostic impact of cohesin mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is controversial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with AML and MDS who underwent next-generation sequencing at the authors' center during 2017–2023, the authors assessed the landscape of cohesin mutations and the impact of co-occurring mutations on overall survival (OS) and compared outcomes between patients with cohesin mutations and those with wild-type (WT) cohesin genes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 83 patients, 36 with cohesin mutations (<i>STAG2</i>, <i>n</i> = 28; <i>SMC1A</i>, <i>n</i> = 7; <i>SMC3</i>, <i>n</i> = 3; co-expression of cohesin mutations, <i>n</i> = 2) and 47 with WT cohesin genes. Of the 36 patients with cohesin mutations, 17 (47%) had AML (six de novo and 11 secondary), and 19 (53%) had MDS. Patients who had <i>STAG2</i> mutations had better median OS than patients who had only <i>SMC1A</i> and <i>SMC3</i> mutations (26 vs. 10 months; <i>p</i> = .043). <i>SRSF2</i> mutation was the most frequent co-occurring mutation (<i>n</i> = 12; 33%) and was associated with worse median OS than WT <i>SRSF2</i> (13 vs. 43 months; <i>p</i> = .016). Seven patients (19%) with cohesin mutations underwent hematopoietic transplantation; their median OS was 70 months. Compared with the WT cohesin group, patients who had cohesin mutations were more likely to have adverse-risk AML (82% vs. 53%). The median OS was similar among patients with adverse-risk AML in the cohesin-mutation and WT cohesin groups (10 vs. 14 months, respectively; <i>p</i> = .9).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The current study provides insight into the prognostic impact of cohesin mutations and co-occurring mutations in patients with myeloid malignancies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prognostic impact of cohesin mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is controversial.

Methods

In patients with AML and MDS who underwent next-generation sequencing at the authors' center during 2017–2023, the authors assessed the landscape of cohesin mutations and the impact of co-occurring mutations on overall survival (OS) and compared outcomes between patients with cohesin mutations and those with wild-type (WT) cohesin genes.

Results

The study included 83 patients, 36 with cohesin mutations (STAG2, n = 28; SMC1A, n = 7; SMC3, n = 3; co-expression of cohesin mutations, n = 2) and 47 with WT cohesin genes. Of the 36 patients with cohesin mutations, 17 (47%) had AML (six de novo and 11 secondary), and 19 (53%) had MDS. Patients who had STAG2 mutations had better median OS than patients who had only SMC1A and SMC3 mutations (26 vs. 10 months; p = .043). SRSF2 mutation was the most frequent co-occurring mutation (n = 12; 33%) and was associated with worse median OS than WT SRSF2 (13 vs. 43 months; p = .016). Seven patients (19%) with cohesin mutations underwent hematopoietic transplantation; their median OS was 70 months. Compared with the WT cohesin group, patients who had cohesin mutations were more likely to have adverse-risk AML (82% vs. 53%). The median OS was similar among patients with adverse-risk AML in the cohesin-mutation and WT cohesin groups (10 vs. 14 months, respectively; p = .9).

Conclusions

The current study provides insight into the prognostic impact of cohesin mutations and co-occurring mutations in patients with myeloid malignancies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓系恶性肿瘤和凝聚素突变患者的特征和临床结果
背景 急性髓性白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的凝聚素突变对预后的影响存在争议。 方法 在2017-2023年间在作者所在中心接受了新一代测序的AML和MDS患者中,作者评估了凝聚素突变的情况以及共存突变对总生存期(OS)的影响,并比较了凝聚素突变患者和具有野生型(WT)凝聚素基因患者的预后。 结果 该研究共纳入 83 例患者,其中 36 例有内聚酶突变(STAG2,28 例;SMC1A,7 例;SMC3,3 例;内聚酶突变共同表达,2 例),47 例有 WT 内聚酶基因。在36名存在凝聚素突变的患者中,17人(47%)患有急性髓细胞性白血病(6人从新发病,11人继发),19人(53%)患有MDS。与仅有SMC1A和SMC3突变的患者相比,STAG2突变患者的中位OS更好(26个月对10个月;P = .043)。SRSF2 突变是最常见的共存突变(n = 12;33%),与 WT SRSF2 相比,中位 OS 更差(13 个月 vs. 43 个月;p = .016)。7名(19%)存在凝聚素突变的患者接受了造血移植;他们的中位OS为70个月。与WT凝聚素组相比,凝聚素突变患者更有可能患有不良风险急性髓细胞性白血病(82% vs. 53%)。凝聚素突变组和WT凝聚素组的不良风险急性髓细胞性白血病患者的中位OS相似(分别为10个月和14个月;P = .9)。 结论 目前的研究为了解髓系恶性肿瘤患者中凝聚素突变和共存突变对预后的影响提供了深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Integration of food and nutrition into oncology care: Proceedings of the Food is Medicine in Oncology Care Symposium. Sex differences in the clinical presentation of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. A pilot study of chemoimmunotherapy in the postconsolidation setting for high-risk neuroblastoma (ANBL19P1): A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Issue Information Exercise recommendations for older adults living with and beyond cancer: A consensus statement by the Advancing Capacity to Integrate Exercise Into the Care of Older Cancer Survivors expert panel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1