Lihan Ge , Mahmoud M. Ali , Ahmed I. Osman , Ahmed M. Elgarahy , M. Samer , Yongdong Xu , Zhidan Liu
{"title":"A critical review on conversion technology for liquid biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass","authors":"Lihan Ge , Mahmoud M. Ali , Ahmed I. Osman , Ahmed M. Elgarahy , M. Samer , Yongdong Xu , Zhidan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for sustainable energy solutions has intensified interest in lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) as a renewable feedstock for liquid biofuels. This review critically evaluates advancements in LCB-to-biofuel conversion technologies, comparing their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic feasibility. Thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and gasification offer conversion efficiencies of 28–40 % at relatively low costs (0.55–0.60 USD/L gasoline equivalent) but require bio-oil upgrading. Biochemical pathways produce higher-quality fuels; however, high enzyme costs and microbial toxicity hinder large-scale implementation. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) shows promise with 35 MJ/kg biocrude energy density and 92 % carbon retention, though high energy input and catalyst costs remain challenges. Biobutanol outperforms bioethanol in energy content (29.2 MJ/dm<sup>3</sup>) and engine compatibility but suffers from microbial toxicity. Biodiesel cuts GHG emissions by 53–61 % but struggles in cold climates. Life cycle assessments indicate significantly reduce GHG emissions, with waste-derived feedstocks mitigating land-use conflicts. Advancing LCB biofuels requires optimizing HTL, enhancing microbial tolerance in biobutanol production, and integrating AI for process improvements. Policy support through subsidies and carbon incentives, along with scalable technology deployment, is key to sustainable biofuel adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 115726"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003995","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The growing demand for sustainable energy solutions has intensified interest in lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) as a renewable feedstock for liquid biofuels. This review critically evaluates advancements in LCB-to-biofuel conversion technologies, comparing their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic feasibility. Thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and gasification offer conversion efficiencies of 28–40 % at relatively low costs (0.55–0.60 USD/L gasoline equivalent) but require bio-oil upgrading. Biochemical pathways produce higher-quality fuels; however, high enzyme costs and microbial toxicity hinder large-scale implementation. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) shows promise with 35 MJ/kg biocrude energy density and 92 % carbon retention, though high energy input and catalyst costs remain challenges. Biobutanol outperforms bioethanol in energy content (29.2 MJ/dm3) and engine compatibility but suffers from microbial toxicity. Biodiesel cuts GHG emissions by 53–61 % but struggles in cold climates. Life cycle assessments indicate significantly reduce GHG emissions, with waste-derived feedstocks mitigating land-use conflicts. Advancing LCB biofuels requires optimizing HTL, enhancing microbial tolerance in biobutanol production, and integrating AI for process improvements. Policy support through subsidies and carbon incentives, along with scalable technology deployment, is key to sustainable biofuel adoption.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.