A critical review on conversion technology for liquid biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-13 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115726
Lihan Ge , Mahmoud M. Ali , Ahmed I. Osman , Ahmed M. Elgarahy , M. Samer , Yongdong Xu , Zhidan Liu
{"title":"A critical review on conversion technology for liquid biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass","authors":"Lihan Ge ,&nbsp;Mahmoud M. Ali ,&nbsp;Ahmed I. Osman ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Elgarahy ,&nbsp;M. Samer ,&nbsp;Yongdong Xu ,&nbsp;Zhidan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for sustainable energy solutions has intensified interest in lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) as a renewable feedstock for liquid biofuels. This review critically evaluates advancements in LCB-to-biofuel conversion technologies, comparing their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic feasibility. Thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and gasification offer conversion efficiencies of 28–40 % at relatively low costs (0.55–0.60 USD/L gasoline equivalent) but require bio-oil upgrading. Biochemical pathways produce higher-quality fuels; however, high enzyme costs and microbial toxicity hinder large-scale implementation. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) shows promise with 35 MJ/kg biocrude energy density and 92 % carbon retention, though high energy input and catalyst costs remain challenges. Biobutanol outperforms bioethanol in energy content (29.2 MJ/dm<sup>3</sup>) and engine compatibility but suffers from microbial toxicity. Biodiesel cuts GHG emissions by 53–61 % but struggles in cold climates. Life cycle assessments indicate significantly reduce GHG emissions, with waste-derived feedstocks mitigating land-use conflicts. Advancing LCB biofuels requires optimizing HTL, enhancing microbial tolerance in biobutanol production, and integrating AI for process improvements. Policy support through subsidies and carbon incentives, along with scalable technology deployment, is key to sustainable biofuel adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 115726"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003995","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable energy solutions has intensified interest in lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) as a renewable feedstock for liquid biofuels. This review critically evaluates advancements in LCB-to-biofuel conversion technologies, comparing their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic feasibility. Thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and gasification offer conversion efficiencies of 28–40 % at relatively low costs (0.55–0.60 USD/L gasoline equivalent) but require bio-oil upgrading. Biochemical pathways produce higher-quality fuels; however, high enzyme costs and microbial toxicity hinder large-scale implementation. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) shows promise with 35 MJ/kg biocrude energy density and 92 % carbon retention, though high energy input and catalyst costs remain challenges. Biobutanol outperforms bioethanol in energy content (29.2 MJ/dm3) and engine compatibility but suffers from microbial toxicity. Biodiesel cuts GHG emissions by 53–61 % but struggles in cold climates. Life cycle assessments indicate significantly reduce GHG emissions, with waste-derived feedstocks mitigating land-use conflicts. Advancing LCB biofuels requires optimizing HTL, enhancing microbial tolerance in biobutanol production, and integrating AI for process improvements. Policy support through subsidies and carbon incentives, along with scalable technology deployment, is key to sustainable biofuel adoption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木质纤维素生物质转化生产液体生物燃料技术综述
对可持续能源解决方案日益增长的需求,增强了人们对木质纤维素生物质(LCB)作为液体生物燃料可再生原料的兴趣。这篇综述批判性地评估了lcb到生物燃料转化技术的进展,比较了它们的效率、环境影响和经济可行性。热解和气化等热化学过程的转化效率为28 - 40%,成本相对较低(0.55-0.60美元/升汽油当量),但需要生物油升级。生化途径产生更高质量的燃料;然而,高昂的酶成本和微生物毒性阻碍了大规模实施。水热液化(HTL)具有35 MJ/kg的生物原油能量密度和92%的碳保留率,但高能量输入和催化剂成本仍然是挑战。生物丁醇在能量含量(29.2 MJ/dm3)和发动机兼容性方面优于生物乙醇,但存在微生物毒性。生物柴油减少了53 - 61%的温室气体排放,但在寒冷的气候中表现不佳。生命周期评估表明,废物来源的原料可显著减少温室气体排放,缓解土地使用冲突。推进LCB生物燃料需要优化html,增强生物丁醇生产中的微生物耐受性,并整合人工智能进行工艺改进。通过补贴和碳激励措施提供的政策支持,以及可扩展的技术部署,是可持续采用生物燃料的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Collective decision-making in energy transitions: A systematic review and a way forward Advancements in superstructures design and solver approaches for heat and mass exchange network synthesis Recent advances for thermal management of electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review A state-of-the-art review on decarbonizing aerospace manufacturing with life cycle sustainability assessment Power-to-protein: Convergent carbon capture, renewable energy, and microbial biomanufacturing for sustainable food security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1