The associations and effects of mindfulness on anger and aggression: A meta-analytic review

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102584
Siobhan M. O'Dean , Elizabeth Summerell , Eddie Harmon-Jones , J David Creswell , Thomas F. Denson
{"title":"The associations and effects of mindfulness on anger and aggression: A meta-analytic review","authors":"Siobhan M. O'Dean ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Summerell ,&nbsp;Eddie Harmon-Jones ,&nbsp;J David Creswell ,&nbsp;Thomas F. Denson","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dispositional mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions have been linked to emotion regulation and may reduce anger and aggression. The present set of four meta-analyses examined and quantified correlational relationships between trait mindfulness, trait anger, and trait aggression, as well as the effects of experimental mindfulness-based interventions on anger and aggression. These meta-analyses contained data from 118 correlational (dispositional mindfulness) and experimental (mindfulness-based intervention) studies. For the subset of self-report correlational studies (<em>k</em><sub>anger</sub> = 243, <em>k</em><sub>aggression</sub> = 286), we found small-to-medium inverse relationships between dispositional mindfulness and both anger (<em>r</em> = −0.23, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and aggression (<em>r</em> = −0.19, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). For experimental studies (<em>k</em><sub>anger</sub> = 95, <em>k</em><sub>aggression</sub> = 38), we found medium effects. Specifically, mindfulness-based interventions produced lower anger (<em>d</em> = −0.48, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and aggression (<em>d</em> = −0.61, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) relative to the control groups. In sum, results suggest that mindfulness can curb angry and aggressive responses. Effect sizes for the interventions were largest in Asia. Studies with passive versus active control groups showed larger effect sizes. Effect sizes were largely equivalent for all populations studied (e.g., clinical, forensic, healthy adults, medical, students). Our meta-analytic findings suggest that mindfulness training may aid the effective regulation of anger and aggression for diverse populations. They also highlight the need for more rigorous control groups in future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102584"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dispositional mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions have been linked to emotion regulation and may reduce anger and aggression. The present set of four meta-analyses examined and quantified correlational relationships between trait mindfulness, trait anger, and trait aggression, as well as the effects of experimental mindfulness-based interventions on anger and aggression. These meta-analyses contained data from 118 correlational (dispositional mindfulness) and experimental (mindfulness-based intervention) studies. For the subset of self-report correlational studies (kanger = 243, kaggression = 286), we found small-to-medium inverse relationships between dispositional mindfulness and both anger (r = −0.23, p < .001) and aggression (r = −0.19, p < .001). For experimental studies (kanger = 95, kaggression = 38), we found medium effects. Specifically, mindfulness-based interventions produced lower anger (d = −0.48, p < .001) and aggression (d = −0.61, p < .001) relative to the control groups. In sum, results suggest that mindfulness can curb angry and aggressive responses. Effect sizes for the interventions were largest in Asia. Studies with passive versus active control groups showed larger effect sizes. Effect sizes were largely equivalent for all populations studied (e.g., clinical, forensic, healthy adults, medical, students). Our meta-analytic findings suggest that mindfulness training may aid the effective regulation of anger and aggression for diverse populations. They also highlight the need for more rigorous control groups in future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念对愤怒和攻击行为的关联和影响:荟萃分析综述
性情正念和基于正念的干预与情绪调节有关,可能会减少愤怒和攻击性。本研究对特质正念、特质愤怒和特质攻击之间的相关关系以及基于正念的实验干预对愤怒和攻击的影响进行了检验和量化。这些荟萃分析包含118项相关研究(倾向正念)和实验研究(基于正念的干预)的数据。对于自我报告相关研究子集(kanger = 243, kaggression = 286),我们发现性格正念与愤怒之间存在中小型的负相关关系(r = - 0.23, p <;.001)和攻击性(r = - 0.19, p <;措施)。在实验研究中(kanger = 95, kaggression = 38),我们发现了中等效应。具体来说,基于正念的干预产生了更低的愤怒(d = - 0.48, p <;.001)和攻击性(d = - 0.61, p <;.001)。总之,研究结果表明,正念可以抑制愤怒和攻击性反应。干预措施的效应量在亚洲最大。被动对照组和主动对照组的研究显示出更大的效应值。所有研究人群(如临床、法医、健康成人、医学、学生)的效应量基本相同。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,正念训练可能有助于有效调节不同人群的愤怒和攻击性。他们还强调了在未来的研究中需要更严格的对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Measuring mindfulness: A systematic review and evaluation of self-report mindfulness scales Linking interpersonal childhood adversity to mental health: A scoping review of trust, mentalizing, agency and interpersonal emotion regulation as candidate social-transactional mechanisms Efficacy of emotion regulation strategy implementation in and across mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis Building resilience to chronic pain during childhood: The Situate – Experience – Learn – Feel (SELF) Framework The association between body dissatisfaction and life satisfaction: A preregistered meta-analysis of 30 years of research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1