Decision-making and cost models of generation company agents for supporting future electricity market mechanism design based on agent-based simulation

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125881
Zhanhua Pan, Zhaoxia Jing
{"title":"Decision-making and cost models of generation company agents for supporting future electricity market mechanism design based on agent-based simulation","authors":"Zhanhua Pan,&nbsp;Zhaoxia Jing","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The large-scale surge in renewable energy installations has transformed the capacity mix of power systems and the roles of generation companies (GENCOs). For example, some thermal generators are now operated at low output levels to ensure the generation capacity and ramping capability of the power system. As a result, the nonlinear characteristics of GENCOs’ marginal generation costs have gradually become prominent, rendering some previously linear assumption-based models obsolete. It is essential to reexamine the decision-making and cost models of GENCOs to support the equilibrium solution and mechanism design of the electricity market during this transition. This paper analyzes the impact of different cost model assumptions on GENCOs, thereby examining the relationship between GENCOs’ bidding models and cost models. We propose standardized expressions for GENCOs’ linear bidding models and piecewise step bidding models in multi-agent simulations of the electricity market. The applicability of different bidding models is analyzed. To address the issue of overly compressed decision space for GENCOs in previous studies, we propose a Multi-worker decision model based on (deep) reinforcement learning. This allows the decision space of GENCOs’ piecewise step bidding to fully cover the bidding space in actual market rules. Finally, various electricity market experiments based on multi-agent simulations are conducted. On the one hand, our proposed GENCOs decision model more effectively reproduces GENCOs’ behavior in actual electricity markets. On the other hand, using real mechanism design as an example, previous GENCOs models may lead to incorrect conclusions in simulations. The decision model proposed in this paper, employing piecewise step bidding and polynomial cost functions, makes the simulation results more consistent with actual rules, thereby effectively supporting future-proof market design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"391 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925006117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large-scale surge in renewable energy installations has transformed the capacity mix of power systems and the roles of generation companies (GENCOs). For example, some thermal generators are now operated at low output levels to ensure the generation capacity and ramping capability of the power system. As a result, the nonlinear characteristics of GENCOs’ marginal generation costs have gradually become prominent, rendering some previously linear assumption-based models obsolete. It is essential to reexamine the decision-making and cost models of GENCOs to support the equilibrium solution and mechanism design of the electricity market during this transition. This paper analyzes the impact of different cost model assumptions on GENCOs, thereby examining the relationship between GENCOs’ bidding models and cost models. We propose standardized expressions for GENCOs’ linear bidding models and piecewise step bidding models in multi-agent simulations of the electricity market. The applicability of different bidding models is analyzed. To address the issue of overly compressed decision space for GENCOs in previous studies, we propose a Multi-worker decision model based on (deep) reinforcement learning. This allows the decision space of GENCOs’ piecewise step bidding to fully cover the bidding space in actual market rules. Finally, various electricity market experiments based on multi-agent simulations are conducted. On the one hand, our proposed GENCOs decision model more effectively reproduces GENCOs’ behavior in actual electricity markets. On the other hand, using real mechanism design as an example, previous GENCOs models may lead to incorrect conclusions in simulations. The decision model proposed in this paper, employing piecewise step bidding and polynomial cost functions, makes the simulation results more consistent with actual rules, thereby effectively supporting future-proof market design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于代理模拟的发电公司代理决策和成本模型,为未来电力市场机制设计提供支持
可再生能源装置的大规模激增改变了电力系统的容量组合和发电公司(genco)的角色。例如,一些火力发电机现在以低输出水平运行,以确保电力系统的发电能力和爬坡能力。因此,发电商边际发电成本的非线性特征逐渐凸显,使得以前一些基于线性假设的模型变得过时。重新审视发电企业的决策模型和成本模型,为电力市场的均衡解决方案和机制设计提供支持。本文分析了不同成本模型假设对发电企业的影响,从而考察了发电企业竞价模型与成本模型之间的关系。提出了电力市场多智能体仿真中GENCOs线性竞价模型和分段竞价模型的标准化表达式。分析了不同投标模式的适用性。为了解决以往研究中genco决策空间过度压缩的问题,我们提出了一种基于(深度)强化学习的多工作者决策模型。这使得发电商分段竞价的决策空间完全覆盖了实际市场规则下的竞价空间。最后,进行了基于多智能体仿真的各种电力市场实验。一方面,本文提出的GENCOs决策模型更有效地再现了GENCOs在实际电力市场中的行为。另一方面,以实际机制设计为例,以往的GENCOs模型在仿真中可能会得出不正确的结论。本文提出的决策模型采用分段步标价和多项式成本函数,使仿真结果更符合实际规则,从而有效地支持面向未来的市场设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Integrating spacers (0D, 1D, 2D, 3D) into 2D MXenes for enhanced energy storage and conversion applications Experimental and numerical analysis of spatial thermal non-uniformity and hotspot formation in an industrial-scale alkaline water electrolyzer stack Benders decomposition for the charging station location-routing problem under stochastic energy consumption: a two-stage model with a space-electricity network perspective Thermodynamic analysis of a near-zero carbon emissions hydrogen-electricity cogeneration system coupled with solar driven chemical looping fuel conversion and energy storage Building energy performance standards: impacts on building energy efficiency and GHG emissions in Washington, DC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1