Enhang Liang , Hongjie Tang , Yiming Liu , Shufeng Liu , Jiang Wu , Wenbin Pan , Yunyi Shang , Shihua Yin
{"title":"A global synthesis reveals the role of strategic hydropower planning in mitigating adverse impacts of reservoir flooding","authors":"Enhang Liang , Hongjie Tang , Yiming Liu , Shufeng Liu , Jiang Wu , Wenbin Pan , Yunyi Shang , Shihua Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydropower is an integral component in the global transition to decarbonized energy systems. However, the construction of hydropower dam leads to a range of adverse socio-environmental consequences as a result of reservoir flooding. Here, we provide a global synthesis that quantifies key impacts associated with future hydropower development and examines how strategic hydropower planning can mitigate these adverse effects, including aboveground biomass loss, terrestrial biodiversity impact, greenhouse gas emission, evaporation loss, and human displacement. Our findings indicate that the prospective dams in tropical regions contribute the majority (72–82 %) of environmental impacts worldwide, while dam-induced displacement predominantly (64 %) occurs in the northern temperate zone. 52–99 % of the variations in these impacts could be explained by the hydropower capacity per unit of reservoir area (power density), suggesting that systematic planning that prioritizes higher power densities could significantly mitigate negative socio-environmental externalities. Basin-wide hydropower planning could reduce 83–89 % of avoidable socio-environmental costs compared with uncoordinated hydropower expansion. Large rivers in tropical Africa and southeastern Asia show the greatest potential for impact mitigation through strategic hydropower planning, where optimized dam portfolios could reduce adverse effects by more than 90 % compared to suboptimal dam portfolios. By integrating watershed, river network, and dam characteristics, we propose a hierarchical framework that disaggregates the primary drivers of dam impacts across multiple spatial scales. This framework provides practical guidelines for strategic dam siting and facilitates a win-win outcome by meeting energy demands while minimizing the impacts on surrounding ecosystems and local communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 115723"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212500396X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hydropower is an integral component in the global transition to decarbonized energy systems. However, the construction of hydropower dam leads to a range of adverse socio-environmental consequences as a result of reservoir flooding. Here, we provide a global synthesis that quantifies key impacts associated with future hydropower development and examines how strategic hydropower planning can mitigate these adverse effects, including aboveground biomass loss, terrestrial biodiversity impact, greenhouse gas emission, evaporation loss, and human displacement. Our findings indicate that the prospective dams in tropical regions contribute the majority (72–82 %) of environmental impacts worldwide, while dam-induced displacement predominantly (64 %) occurs in the northern temperate zone. 52–99 % of the variations in these impacts could be explained by the hydropower capacity per unit of reservoir area (power density), suggesting that systematic planning that prioritizes higher power densities could significantly mitigate negative socio-environmental externalities. Basin-wide hydropower planning could reduce 83–89 % of avoidable socio-environmental costs compared with uncoordinated hydropower expansion. Large rivers in tropical Africa and southeastern Asia show the greatest potential for impact mitigation through strategic hydropower planning, where optimized dam portfolios could reduce adverse effects by more than 90 % compared to suboptimal dam portfolios. By integrating watershed, river network, and dam characteristics, we propose a hierarchical framework that disaggregates the primary drivers of dam impacts across multiple spatial scales. This framework provides practical guidelines for strategic dam siting and facilitates a win-win outcome by meeting energy demands while minimizing the impacts on surrounding ecosystems and local communities.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.