Demand- and supply-side perspectives on parental support: Inequalities between and within families

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Science Research Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103181
Matthijs Kalmijn
{"title":"Demand- and supply-side perspectives on parental support: Inequalities between and within families","authors":"Matthijs Kalmijn","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current generations of adult children are believed to rely on their parents for more extended periods of their lives than in the past. Theories of parental transfers to adult children often rely on the logic of demand and supply to explain inequality of support within and between families. The current paper examines these notions using an improved research design for understanding variations in four support dimensions: practical, financial, informational, and grandparenting. Random and fixed-effects regression models were estimated on a sample of 16,603 children aged 18–50 nested in 7826 parents in the Netherlands. Findings reveal that support transfers to children strongly depend on parents’ resources and time constraints, confirming the role of supply. Models for sibling differences within families show that parents allocate more support to children with personal problems and children who experienced adverse life events, in line with the notion of demand. Supply and demand-side factors play a weaker role for stepparents but similar roles for married and separated parents. Supply-side effects increase inequality in future generations, whereas demand-side effects reduce inequality by mitigating differences within families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current generations of adult children are believed to rely on their parents for more extended periods of their lives than in the past. Theories of parental transfers to adult children often rely on the logic of demand and supply to explain inequality of support within and between families. The current paper examines these notions using an improved research design for understanding variations in four support dimensions: practical, financial, informational, and grandparenting. Random and fixed-effects regression models were estimated on a sample of 16,603 children aged 18–50 nested in 7826 parents in the Netherlands. Findings reveal that support transfers to children strongly depend on parents’ resources and time constraints, confirming the role of supply. Models for sibling differences within families show that parents allocate more support to children with personal problems and children who experienced adverse life events, in line with the notion of demand. Supply and demand-side factors play a weaker role for stepparents but similar roles for married and separated parents. Supply-side effects increase inequality in future generations, whereas demand-side effects reduce inequality by mitigating differences within families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母支持的需求方和供给方观点:家庭之间和家庭内部的不平等
据信,与过去相比,现在这一代的成年子女在更长时间内依赖父母。父母转移给成年子女的理论往往依赖于需求和供给的逻辑来解释家庭内部和家庭之间的支持不平等。当前的论文使用改进的研究设计来理解四个支持维度的变化:实践,财务,信息和祖父母。随机和固定效应回归模型对荷兰7826对父母中16,603名年龄在18-50岁之间的儿童进行了估计。研究结果显示,对儿童的支持转移强烈依赖于父母的资源和时间限制,证实了供应的作用。家庭内部兄弟姐妹差异的模型显示,父母会将更多的支持分配给有个人问题的孩子和经历过不良生活事件的孩子,这与需求的概念一致。供给侧和需求侧因素对继父母的作用较弱,但对已婚和离异父母的作用相似。供给侧效应增加了后代的不平等,而需求侧效应通过缓和家庭内部的差异来减少不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
期刊最新文献
Family background and school-to-work trajectories in China Gendered reporting of housework across relative spousal income Yours, mine, and ours: Childhood disadvantage and late-life social connectedness in marital dyads Buying out in same-sex and different-sex couples in the United States: Outsourcing of routine and non-routine housework tasks How probability distributions felled the case for the beneficial effects of income inequality: and other adventures of probability distributions on the knowledge quest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1