Fast spectral line calculations with the escape probability method and tests using synthetic observations of interstellar clouds

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy & Astrophysics Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/202453409
Mika Juvela
{"title":"Fast spectral line calculations with the escape probability method and tests using synthetic observations of interstellar clouds","authors":"Mika Juvela","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202453409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Context.<i/> Radiative transfer (RT) effects need to be taken into account when analysing spectral line observations. When the data are not sufficient for detailed modelling, simpler methods are needed. The escape probability formalism (EPF) is one such tool.<i>Aims.<i/> We wish to quantify the model errors in the EPF analysis of interstellar clouds and cores.<i>Methods.<i/> We introduce PEP, a parallel programme for calculating fast EPF parameters quickly. We modelled a full RT to generate synthetic observations for various cloud models. We examined these with the PEP programme, comparing these results to the actual beam-averaged kinetic temperatures, column densities, and volume densities.<i>Results.<i/> PEP enables the calculation of even millions of parameter combinations in a matter of seconds. However, the simple assumptions of EPF can lead to significant errors. In these tests, the errors were typically within a factor of 2, but could (in some cases) rise to one full order of magnitude. The model errors are thus similar or even larger than the statistical errors caused by the typical observational noise. Due to degeneracies, the parameter combinations were shown to be better constrained than the individual parameters. The model errors could be reduced by using full radiative transfer modelling. However, in the absence of full knowledge of the source structure, the errors are difficult to quantify. We also present a method for approximate handling of hyperfine structure lines in EPF calculations.<i>Conclusions.<i/> Both the observational statistical errors and the model errors need to be considered when estimating the reliability of EPF results. Full RT modelling is needed to better understand the true uncertainties.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context. Radiative transfer (RT) effects need to be taken into account when analysing spectral line observations. When the data are not sufficient for detailed modelling, simpler methods are needed. The escape probability formalism (EPF) is one such tool.Aims. We wish to quantify the model errors in the EPF analysis of interstellar clouds and cores.Methods. We introduce PEP, a parallel programme for calculating fast EPF parameters quickly. We modelled a full RT to generate synthetic observations for various cloud models. We examined these with the PEP programme, comparing these results to the actual beam-averaged kinetic temperatures, column densities, and volume densities.Results. PEP enables the calculation of even millions of parameter combinations in a matter of seconds. However, the simple assumptions of EPF can lead to significant errors. In these tests, the errors were typically within a factor of 2, but could (in some cases) rise to one full order of magnitude. The model errors are thus similar or even larger than the statistical errors caused by the typical observational noise. Due to degeneracies, the parameter combinations were shown to be better constrained than the individual parameters. The model errors could be reduced by using full radiative transfer modelling. However, in the absence of full knowledge of the source structure, the errors are difficult to quantify. We also present a method for approximate handling of hyperfine structure lines in EPF calculations.Conclusions. Both the observational statistical errors and the model errors need to be considered when estimating the reliability of EPF results. Full RT modelling is needed to better understand the true uncertainties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逃逸概率法快速谱线计算和星际云综合观测测试
上下文。在分析光谱线观测时,需要考虑辐射传递效应。当数据不足以进行详细的建模时,需要更简单的方法。逃逸概率形式论(EPF)就是这样一种工具。我们希望量化星际云和星际核的EPF分析中的模型误差。本文介绍了一个快速计算EPF参数的并行程序PEP。我们模拟了一个完整的RT来生成各种云模型的综合观测结果。我们用PEP程序检查了这些结果,并将这些结果与实际的梁平均动力学温度、柱密度和体积密度进行了比较。PEP可以在几秒钟内计算数百万个参数组合。然而,简单的EPF假设可能导致严重的错误。在这些测试中,误差通常在2的范围内,但(在某些情况下)可能上升到一个完整的数量级。因此,模型误差与典型观测噪声引起的统计误差相似,甚至更大。由于简并性的存在,参数组合比单个参数具有更好的约束。采用全辐射传输模型可以减小模型误差。然而,在缺乏对源结构的充分了解的情况下,误差很难量化。我们还提出了一种在EPF计算中近似处理超精细结构线的方法。在估计EPF结果的可靠性时,既要考虑观测统计误差,也要考虑模型误差。为了更好地理解真正的不确定性,需要全RT建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
期刊最新文献
Gas-phase formation routes of dimethyl sulfide in the interstellar medium Introducing the Rhea simulations of Milky Way-like galaxies Searching for close-in planets around TWA 7 with SPIRou Identifying substructure associations in the Milky Way halo using chemo-kinematic tagging Stationary wave dynamics in Venus's upper clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1