The statistical reader: The role of orthographic regularities in reading.

IF 3.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1037/xge0001775
Noam Siegelman,Blair C Armstrong,Yaakov Raz,Ram Frost
{"title":"The statistical reader: The role of orthographic regularities in reading.","authors":"Noam Siegelman,Blair C Armstrong,Yaakov Raz,Ram Frost","doi":"10.1037/xge0001775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent statistical learning views of reading posit that writing systems present to their readers a wide range of statistical regularities which are leveraged to process printed texts. While substantial research has focused on the \"vertical\" correlations between orthographic, phonological, and semantic units in a given writing system, here we employ information-theoretic measures to further consider \"horizontal\" regularities-the extent to which printed units predict and are predicted by other printed units, in one writing system compared to another. As a first step, we present a novel information-theoretic measure that captures how horizontal regularities constrain lexical access given the distribution of orthographic information in a writing system and considering realistic retinal and cognitive constraints. We then present a series of empirical studies serving as proof of concept, from both single-word reading experiments and analyses of eye movements during naturalistic reading, which examine how a reader who has internalized these regularities could leverage them for efficient uncertainty reduction regarding printed information while reading on-the-fly. Our findings converge on high-order general principles fleshed out in terms of explicit computational mechanisms that simultaneously apply to a wide range of writing systems and that can potentially explain behavioral outcomes across the trajectory of reading development and reading skill. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001775","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent statistical learning views of reading posit that writing systems present to their readers a wide range of statistical regularities which are leveraged to process printed texts. While substantial research has focused on the "vertical" correlations between orthographic, phonological, and semantic units in a given writing system, here we employ information-theoretic measures to further consider "horizontal" regularities-the extent to which printed units predict and are predicted by other printed units, in one writing system compared to another. As a first step, we present a novel information-theoretic measure that captures how horizontal regularities constrain lexical access given the distribution of orthographic information in a writing system and considering realistic retinal and cognitive constraints. We then present a series of empirical studies serving as proof of concept, from both single-word reading experiments and analyses of eye movements during naturalistic reading, which examine how a reader who has internalized these regularities could leverage them for efficient uncertainty reduction regarding printed information while reading on-the-fly. Our findings converge on high-order general principles fleshed out in terms of explicit computational mechanisms that simultaneously apply to a wide range of writing systems and that can potentially explain behavioral outcomes across the trajectory of reading development and reading skill. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统计阅读器:正字法规律在阅读中的作用。
最近关于阅读的统计学习观点认为,书写系统向读者呈现了广泛的统计规律,这些规律被用来处理印刷文本。虽然大量的研究集中在给定的书写系统中正字法、语音和语义单位之间的“垂直”相关性上,但在这里,我们采用信息论的方法进一步考虑“水平”规律——在一种书写系统中,与另一种书写系统相比,印刷单位预测和被其他印刷单位预测的程度。作为第一步,我们提出了一种新的信息论测量方法,该方法捕捉了在书写系统中给定正字法信息分布并考虑到现实的视网膜和认知约束的情况下,水平规律如何限制词汇访问。然后,我们提出了一系列的实证研究,作为概念的证明,从单字阅读实验和自然阅读过程中的眼球运动分析中,研究了一个读者如何内化这些规律,从而在阅读时有效地利用它们来减少印刷信息的不确定性。我们的研究结果集中在高阶一般原则上,以明确的计算机制充实,同时适用于广泛的书写系统,并可能解释阅读发展和阅读技能轨迹上的行为结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Domain-general object recognition predicts human ability to tell real from AI-generated faces. Supplemental Material for Indifferent or Impartial? Actor–Observer Asymmetries in Expressing and Evaluating Sociopolitical Neutrality Generative insight: Aha! Moments in category generation and divergent thinking. Supplemental Material for Instrumental Harm and Impartial Beneficence Distinctively Frame Cognitive Representations of Moral Decision Problems Supplemental Material for Domain-General Object Recognition Predicts Human Ability to Tell Real From AI-Generated Faces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1