What goes around comes around: Foreign language use increases immanent justice thinking

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104747
Janet Geipel , Constantinos Hadjichristidis , Luca Surian
{"title":"What goes around comes around: Foreign language use increases immanent justice thinking","authors":"Janet Geipel ,&nbsp;Constantinos Hadjichristidis ,&nbsp;Luca Surian","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Immanent justice thinking refers to the tendency to perceive causal connections between an agent's bad (good) deeds and subsequent bad (good) outcomes, even when such connections are rationally implausible. We asked bilinguals to read scenarios written either in their native language or in a foreign language and examined how language influences immanent justice endorsements. In five pre-registered, randomized experiments involving 1875 participants from two bilingual populations, we demonstrate that foreign language use increases immanent justice endorsements. This effect was largely unrelated to foreign language proficiency, emerged only for problems that could trigger immanent justice intuitions, and was eliminated by a prompt to think rationally. These results suggest that using a foreign language increases immanent justice endorsements by reducing awareness of the conflict between intuition and rational reasoning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immanent justice thinking refers to the tendency to perceive causal connections between an agent's bad (good) deeds and subsequent bad (good) outcomes, even when such connections are rationally implausible. We asked bilinguals to read scenarios written either in their native language or in a foreign language and examined how language influences immanent justice endorsements. In five pre-registered, randomized experiments involving 1875 participants from two bilingual populations, we demonstrate that foreign language use increases immanent justice endorsements. This effect was largely unrelated to foreign language proficiency, emerged only for problems that could trigger immanent justice intuitions, and was eliminated by a prompt to think rationally. These results suggest that using a foreign language increases immanent justice endorsements by reducing awareness of the conflict between intuition and rational reasoning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以牙还牙:外语的使用增加了内在的正义思维
即时正义思维指的是一种倾向,即认为行为人的坏事(好事)与随后的坏事(好事)结果之间存在因果联系,即使这种联系在理性上是不可信的。我们要求双语者阅读用母语或外语编写的情景,并研究了语言如何影响即在正义的认可。在五个预先登记的随机实验中,来自两个双语群体的 1875 名参与者参与了实验,结果表明,使用外语会增加即席正义感。这种效应在很大程度上与外语水平无关,只出现在可能引发即兴正义直觉的问题上,并在理性思考的提示下被消除。这些结果表明,使用外语可以减少对直觉与理性推理之间冲突的认识,从而增加对即在正义的认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
期刊最新文献
Folk devils? Perceived lack of traditional values explains youth-related stereotypes of sexual minorities and Black men A (costly) penny for your thoughts? Allies cause harm by seeking marginalized group members' help when confronting prejudice Distinct modulatory effects of altruistic and deontological guilt on neural processes of empathy Editorial Board Attitudes guiding social behavior as a function of perceived knowledge: The moderating role of epistemic vs. hedonic mindsets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1