Explicit and implicit timing in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110358
Annika Hellweg , Michael Schwarz , Katrin Walther , Hajo Hamer , Antonino Visalli , Giovanna Mioni
{"title":"Explicit and implicit timing in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients","authors":"Annika Hellweg ,&nbsp;Michael Schwarz ,&nbsp;Katrin Walther ,&nbsp;Hajo Hamer ,&nbsp;Antonino Visalli ,&nbsp;Giovanna Mioni","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The present study investigates the explicit and implicit timing abilities of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Based on previous studies, it was hypothesized that timing abilities were decreased in MTLE patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The performance of 21 MTLE patients and 21 neurologically healthy probands was tested on two separate tasks. The time bisection task was used to investigate explicit timing and the foreperiod task to test implicit timing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the time bisection task, less precise temporal judgements were found in the patient group compared to the control group. This was indicated by a flatter psychophysical curve in the patients compared to controls. Moreover, participants did not differ in term of precision, but patients were more variable than controls. There was no statistical difference between the performance of the control and the patient group in the implicit timing task. Both groups demonstrated the foreperiod effect, meaning that the RTs of the participants became shorter with longer durations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MTLE patients showed less precise temporal judgments in explicit timing, while their implicit timing was largely preserved. This finding suggests that explicit time perception should be routinely investigated in MTLE patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 110358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025000976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The present study investigates the explicit and implicit timing abilities of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Based on previous studies, it was hypothesized that timing abilities were decreased in MTLE patients.

Methods

The performance of 21 MTLE patients and 21 neurologically healthy probands was tested on two separate tasks. The time bisection task was used to investigate explicit timing and the foreperiod task to test implicit timing.

Results

For the time bisection task, less precise temporal judgements were found in the patient group compared to the control group. This was indicated by a flatter psychophysical curve in the patients compared to controls. Moreover, participants did not differ in term of precision, but patients were more variable than controls. There was no statistical difference between the performance of the control and the patient group in the implicit timing task. Both groups demonstrated the foreperiod effect, meaning that the RTs of the participants became shorter with longer durations.

Conclusions

MTLE patients showed less precise temporal judgments in explicit timing, while their implicit timing was largely preserved. This finding suggests that explicit time perception should be routinely investigated in MTLE patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内颞叶癫痫患者的外显和内隐时间
目的探讨内侧颞叶癫痫(MTLE)患者的外显和内隐计时能力。根据以往的研究,我们假设MTLE患者的计时能力下降。方法对21例MTLE患者和21例神经健康先证者分别进行两项任务测试。用时间平分任务考察外显时间,用前段任务考察内隐时间。结果在时间分割任务中,患者组的时间判断精度低于对照组。与对照组相比,患者的心理生理曲线更平坦。此外,参与者在精确度方面没有差异,但患者比对照组更具变数。在隐性时间任务中,对照组和患者组的表现无统计学差异。两组都表现出前期效应,这意味着参与者的RTs随着持续时间的延长而变短。结论smtle患者外显时间判断精度较低,内隐时间判断基本保留。这一发现表明外显时间知觉应该在MTLE患者中进行常规调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
Burn injuries in patients with epilepsy: A narrative review Extreme ambient temperatures and seizure outcomes in children with epilepsy: insights from a survey in Turkey Adaptive and cognitive trajectories in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy and intellectual disabilities Patient-reported outcome measures in patients with post-brain injury seizures Bullying victimisation as a mediator in the association between childhood epilepsy and later emotional and behavioural difficulties: Evidence from the British National Child development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1