Transportation accessibility for people with disabilities: Examining preferences for conventional public transport and ride-hailing services in Indonesia

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101451
Kasmad Ariansyah , Caecilia Suprapti Dwi Takariani , Diana Sari , Ahmad Budi Setiawan , Syarif Budhirianto , Ardison , Ari Cahyo Nugroho , Dayat Hidayat , Alfin Hikmaturokhman
{"title":"Transportation accessibility for people with disabilities: Examining preferences for conventional public transport and ride-hailing services in Indonesia","authors":"Kasmad Ariansyah ,&nbsp;Caecilia Suprapti Dwi Takariani ,&nbsp;Diana Sari ,&nbsp;Ahmad Budi Setiawan ,&nbsp;Syarif Budhirianto ,&nbsp;Ardison ,&nbsp;Ari Cahyo Nugroho ,&nbsp;Dayat Hidayat ,&nbsp;Alfin Hikmaturokhman","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transportation is essential for facilitating economic, social, and political interactions by supporting population mobility, and ensuring accessibility is central to both mobility equality and social justice. In this context, people with disabilities (PwD), the world’s largest minority group, face significant barriers in accessing transportation, making it crucial to understand their transportation mode preferences. This study examines the likelihood of PwD selecting conventional public transportation and ride-hailing services as their primary mode of travel. Using data from Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Indonesia, logistic regression analyses, rare event logistic regression analyses, and heterogeneity tests across demographic and geographical groups show that PwD are significantly less likely to use conventional public transportation compared to non-disabled individuals, whereas no significant difference is observed for ride-hailing services. The findings are consistent across gender, urban–rural, and Java-outside Java classifications, except for females, where no significant difference in public transport use was found. Additionally, the GIS-based thematic mapping of residuals reveals notable variations, particularly when comparing Java to areas outside Java. This indicates that regional disparities significantly influence service utilization patterns among individuals with disabilities. Finally, the study provides theoretical, practical, and policy implications, suggesting potential avenues for future research and contributing to a more inclusive understanding of transportation accessibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transportation is essential for facilitating economic, social, and political interactions by supporting population mobility, and ensuring accessibility is central to both mobility equality and social justice. In this context, people with disabilities (PwD), the world’s largest minority group, face significant barriers in accessing transportation, making it crucial to understand their transportation mode preferences. This study examines the likelihood of PwD selecting conventional public transportation and ride-hailing services as their primary mode of travel. Using data from Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Indonesia, logistic regression analyses, rare event logistic regression analyses, and heterogeneity tests across demographic and geographical groups show that PwD are significantly less likely to use conventional public transportation compared to non-disabled individuals, whereas no significant difference is observed for ride-hailing services. The findings are consistent across gender, urban–rural, and Java-outside Java classifications, except for females, where no significant difference in public transport use was found. Additionally, the GIS-based thematic mapping of residuals reveals notable variations, particularly when comparing Java to areas outside Java. This indicates that regional disparities significantly influence service utilization patterns among individuals with disabilities. Finally, the study provides theoretical, practical, and policy implications, suggesting potential avenues for future research and contributing to a more inclusive understanding of transportation accessibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾人的交通可达性:考察印度尼西亚对传统公共交通和叫车服务的偏好
通过支持人口流动,交通对于促进经济、社会和政治互动至关重要,确保可达性是流动性平等和社会正义的核心。在这种情况下,残疾人(PwD)作为世界上最大的少数群体,在获取交通工具方面面临重大障碍,因此了解他们的交通方式偏好至关重要。本研究考察了残疾人选择传统公共交通和网约车服务作为主要出行方式的可能性。利用印尼巴丹统计局(BPS)的数据,logistic回归分析、罕见事件logistic回归分析以及跨人口和地理群体的异质性测试表明,与非残疾人相比,残疾人使用传统公共交通的可能性显著降低,而在乘车服务方面没有观察到显著差异。这些发现在性别、城乡和Java以外的Java分类中是一致的,除了女性,在公共交通使用方面没有发现显著差异。此外,基于gis的残差专题映射揭示了显著的变化,特别是在比较Java和Java以外的地区时。这表明,区域差异显著影响残疾人的服务利用模式。最后,该研究提供了理论、实践和政策启示,为未来的研究提供了潜在的途径,并有助于对交通可达性的更包容的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
From gasoline to green: understanding the acceptance of electric motorcycles from the motorcyclists’ perspective – evidence from Tehran Connecting or dividing London? Evaluating the impact of the Elizabeth Line on job accessibility and spatial equity Simulation-based decision-making framework for sustainable intermodal transport including next-generation freight electric multiple-units Integrating non-motorized transportation with light rail transit: travel demand models for Rayong, Thailand Temporal heterogeneity in sociotechnical urban mobility systems: Evidence from distributed lag models in Curitiba, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1