Assessing Amsterdam’s urban mobility through the lens of smart mobility goals

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101443
Maryam Qonita , Rini Rachmawati , R. Rijanta
{"title":"Assessing Amsterdam’s urban mobility through the lens of smart mobility goals","authors":"Maryam Qonita ,&nbsp;Rini Rachmawati ,&nbsp;R. Rijanta","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization and economic growth have heightened the demand for efficient, sustainable mobility systems. Amsterdam’s goal to become the world’s leading smart mobility city motivated this study to evaluates Amsterdam’s mobility performance across six smart mobility goals: sustainability, efficiency, safety, accessibility, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. The assessment draws on quantitative data, qualitative data, and observational studies to evaluate alignment with global benchmarks and identify challenges in balancing competing objectives. Results indicate that Amsterdam excels with perfect scores in safety, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. Sustainability (9.48) and accessibility (9.97) scores are below perfect due to unmet targets for low-energy vehicle adoption and public transport coverage. Efficiency remains a challenge, with a score of 6.72 due to congestion and long travel times. A notable trade-off exists between efficiency and safety, as Amsterdam’s 30 km/h speed limit on most roads enhances safety but slows travel speeds—reflecting the city’s commitment to safety and liveability over speed. Measures—such as smart traffic management, investments in active mobility, public transport improvement, and exempting public transport from the speed limit—could help to balance the dual goals of safety and efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101443"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X2500080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and economic growth have heightened the demand for efficient, sustainable mobility systems. Amsterdam’s goal to become the world’s leading smart mobility city motivated this study to evaluates Amsterdam’s mobility performance across six smart mobility goals: sustainability, efficiency, safety, accessibility, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. The assessment draws on quantitative data, qualitative data, and observational studies to evaluate alignment with global benchmarks and identify challenges in balancing competing objectives. Results indicate that Amsterdam excels with perfect scores in safety, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. Sustainability (9.48) and accessibility (9.97) scores are below perfect due to unmet targets for low-energy vehicle adoption and public transport coverage. Efficiency remains a challenge, with a score of 6.72 due to congestion and long travel times. A notable trade-off exists between efficiency and safety, as Amsterdam’s 30 km/h speed limit on most roads enhances safety but slows travel speeds—reflecting the city’s commitment to safety and liveability over speed. Measures—such as smart traffic management, investments in active mobility, public transport improvement, and exempting public transport from the speed limit—could help to balance the dual goals of safety and efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过智能交通目标来评估阿姆斯特丹的城市交通
快速的城市化和经济增长提高了对高效、可持续的交通系统的需求。阿姆斯特丹的目标是成为世界领先的智能交通城市,这促使本研究从六个智能交通目标(可持续性、效率、安全性、可达性、便利性和成本效益)来评估阿姆斯特丹的交通绩效。评估利用定量数据、定性数据和观察性研究来评估与全球基准的一致性,并确定在平衡相互竞争的目标方面面临的挑战。结果表明,阿姆斯特丹在安全性、便利性和成本效益方面都取得了满分。可持续性(9.48)和可达性(9.97)得分低于完美,原因是低能耗汽车的采用和公共交通覆盖的目标未实现。效率仍然是一个挑战,由于交通拥堵和出行时间长,得分为6.72。效率和安全之间存在着一个值得注意的权衡,因为阿姆斯特丹大多数道路上30公里/小时的限速提高了安全性,但降低了行驶速度——这反映了这座城市对安全和宜居性的承诺。诸如智能交通管理、主动交通投资、公共交通改善以及公共交通免于限速等措施可以帮助平衡安全和效率的双重目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
From gasoline to green: understanding the acceptance of electric motorcycles from the motorcyclists’ perspective – evidence from Tehran Connecting or dividing London? Evaluating the impact of the Elizabeth Line on job accessibility and spatial equity Simulation-based decision-making framework for sustainable intermodal transport including next-generation freight electric multiple-units Integrating non-motorized transportation with light rail transit: travel demand models for Rayong, Thailand Temporal heterogeneity in sociotechnical urban mobility systems: Evidence from distributed lag models in Curitiba, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1