A new module for tapetum development: the functional exploration of TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2 module in rice

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1111/nph.70149
Shanshan Zhu, Jianmin Wan
{"title":"A new module for tapetum development: the functional exploration of TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2 module in rice","authors":"Shanshan Zhu,&nbsp;Jianmin Wan","doi":"10.1111/nph.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Precisely controlling anther and pollen development is critical for reproductive success. Microspore mother cells (MMCs) undergo meiosis to produce microspores, which undergo two mitotic divisions to develop into mature pollen in the central cavity of the anther. The tapetum, the innermost layer of the anther wall, is closely linked to the development of the male gametophyte and plays an important role in microspore maturation (Jung <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>; Ariizumi &amp; Toriyama, <span>2011</span>). Previous studies have found that four bHLH transcription factors regulate programmed cell death (PCD) of the tapetum and pollen development in rice: UDT1, TDR, ETERNAL TAPETUM1 (EAT1), and TIP2 (Jung <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>; Li <i>et al</i>., <span>2006</span>; Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>; Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; Ko <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>). These bHLH transcription factors form heterodimers and constitute a feed-forward transcription cascade to regulate rice anther development in sequential developmental stages. Mutants of these factors exhibit defects in tapetum development and degeneration to varying degrees (Jung <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>; Li <i>et al</i>., <span>2006</span>; Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>; Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; Ko <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; Ono <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>). UDT1 and TIP2 are both initially expressed before meiosis and are essential for the development and degeneration of the tapetum (Jung <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>; Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>). TIP2 activates <i>TDR</i> and forms heterodimers with TDR to promote tapetum differentiation and trigger tapetal PCD at a later stage (Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; Ko <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>). The TIP2–TDR complex directly upregulates the expression of <i>EAT1</i>, followed by the formation of TDR–EAT1 heterodimer, which is required for activation of tapetal PCD (Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>; Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; Ko <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>). Both UDT1 and TIP2 are involved in the early stage of anther wall layer development, and their mutants show similar defective phenotypes. Whether TIP2 can form a heterodimer with UDT1, and how these two factors coordinately regulate anther development remain important questions with significant research value.</p><p>Wang <i>et al</i>. revealed that UDT1 and TIP2 proteins are localized in overlapping but not entirely identical anther cell layers, suggesting that these two factors have both shared and distinct functions. They further demonstrated that TIP2 can physically interact with UDT1, whereas neither TIP2 nor UDT1 alone possesses transcription activation activity; the TIP2–UDT1 complex is capable of activating target gene expression. These findings provide the first evidence that TIP2 and UDT1 can also heterodimerize to regulate anther development in rice (Fig. 1). This discovery enhances our understanding of the protein regulatory network involved in rice anther development.</p><p>The transition from mitosis to meiosis in MMCs involves dramatic cell wall remodeling, which is a critical step for male gametogenesis. During this process, the primary cellulosic walls of MMCs are reorganized and replaced by callose (β-1,3-glucan) (Matsuo <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>). After meiosis, the callose wall is degraded by β-1,3-glucanase (callase), which is synthesized and secreted by tapetal cells to facilitate microspore release (Ariizumi &amp; Toriyama, <span>2011</span>). While the enzymatic basis for wall degradation is partially understood, the molecular regulatory networks controlling the dynamic callose deposition and degeneration remain poorly defined. Previous studies have reported that <i>udt1</i>, <i>tip2</i>, and <i>tdr</i> mutants in rice display a significant delay in callose degradation (Jung <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>; Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>), indicating that these genes may regulate the synthesis or secretion of callase from the tapetum. Key questions that arise from these observations are how do these transcription factors regulate the synthesis and secretion of callase, and what are the direct target genes of these TFs?</p><p>Wang <i>et al</i>. identified a large number of differentially expressed genes through transcriptomic analysis of WT, <i>tip2</i>, and <i>udt1-2</i> spikelets at Stages 6 and 7. Gene Ontology analysis revealed that carbohydrate-active glycosyltransferases and glycosyl hydrolases were enriched among the shared downregulated genes in two mutants. Among these, two genes, designated <i>OsUPEX1</i> and <i>OsUPEX2</i>, are specifically expressed in the anther and encode putative β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferases. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that they are homologous to <i>UPEX1/KNS4/RES3</i> in Arabidopsis and <i>Male sterile8</i> (<i>Ms8</i>) in maize. In Arabidopsis, <i>UPEX1/KNS4/RES3</i>, which encodes an arabinogalactan β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferase, was initially identified as a key player in pollen wall development and later shown to be involved in callose degradation (Dobritsa <i>et al</i>., <span>2011</span>; Suzuki <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>; Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). <i>UPEX1/KNS4/RES3</i> is regulated by ABORTED MICROSPORE (AMS), the ortholog of TDR in Arabidopsis (Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). In maize, <i>Ms8</i> regulates both callose remodeling and tapetal cell development (Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2010</span>, <span>2013</span>). Wang <i>et al</i>. demonstrated that the TIP2–UDT1 complex directly binds to the E-box <i>cis</i>-elements in the promoter of <i>OsUPEX1</i> and <i>OsUPEX2</i> and activates their expression. While no obvious phenotypic differences were observed between WT and <i>osupex1</i> or <i>osupex2</i> single mutants, the <i>osupex1osupex2</i> double mutants exhibited complete male sterility, with anthers ceasing to grow after stage 8 and lacking pollen at maturity. In the <i>osupex1osupex2</i> double mutant, meiosis progressed normally with tetrads formation, but microspores collapsed shortly after meiosis. Additionally, tapetal cell structures differed significantly from those in WT from Stage 8. Specifically, the tapetum of the <i>osupex1osupex2</i> double mutants swelled at Stage 8 and precociously degraded by late Stage 9. At Stages 8a and 8b, callose remodeling in <i>tip2</i>, <i>udt1-2</i>, and <i>osupex1-1 osupex1-2</i> mutants was impaired, with callose persisting throughout the locule instead of being confined to areas surrounding dyads and tetrads as in WT. These findings suggest that TIP2, UDT1, and OsUPEX1/OsUPEX2 may regulate the secretion of callase from the tapetum into the locule (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the colocalization of OsUPEX1/2 with Golgi markers and the appearance of OsUPEX1/2-GFP as dot signals in tapetal cells suggest that these proteins may be involved in protein glycosylation within the Golgi apparatus and are essential for the general secretory function of the tapetum.</p><p>This study fills gaps in our understanding of early anther development by elucidating the TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2 pathway. It underscores the critical role of OsUPEX1/2 in tapetum secretion, offering new perspectives on anther and pollen development. Furthermore, this study reveals the conserved role of OsUPEX1/2 and their orthologs in <i>Arabidopsis</i> (<i>AtUPEX1/KNS4</i>) and maize (<i>ZmMs8</i>), while also highlighting species-specific divergences in their roles in tapetal development and regulatory mechanisms. Despite these advances, this study raises several intriguing scientific questions, such as the need to identify the specific proteins modified by the glycosyltransferase OsUPEX1/2 and elucidate the mechanisms by which it regulates callase secretion.</p><p>The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"247 2","pages":"439-441"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nph.70149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precisely controlling anther and pollen development is critical for reproductive success. Microspore mother cells (MMCs) undergo meiosis to produce microspores, which undergo two mitotic divisions to develop into mature pollen in the central cavity of the anther. The tapetum, the innermost layer of the anther wall, is closely linked to the development of the male gametophyte and plays an important role in microspore maturation (Jung et al., 2005; Ariizumi & Toriyama, 2011). Previous studies have found that four bHLH transcription factors regulate programmed cell death (PCD) of the tapetum and pollen development in rice: UDT1, TDR, ETERNAL TAPETUM1 (EAT1), and TIP2 (Jung et al., 2005; Li et al., 2006; Niu et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2014; Ko et al., 2014). These bHLH transcription factors form heterodimers and constitute a feed-forward transcription cascade to regulate rice anther development in sequential developmental stages. Mutants of these factors exhibit defects in tapetum development and degeneration to varying degrees (Jung et al., 2005; Li et al., 2006; Niu et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2014; Ko et al., 2014; Ono et al., 2019). UDT1 and TIP2 are both initially expressed before meiosis and are essential for the development and degeneration of the tapetum (Jung et al., 2005; Fu et al., 2014). TIP2 activates TDR and forms heterodimers with TDR to promote tapetum differentiation and trigger tapetal PCD at a later stage (Fu et al., 2014; Ko et al., 2014). The TIP2–TDR complex directly upregulates the expression of EAT1, followed by the formation of TDR–EAT1 heterodimer, which is required for activation of tapetal PCD (Niu et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2014; Ko et al., 2014). Both UDT1 and TIP2 are involved in the early stage of anther wall layer development, and their mutants show similar defective phenotypes. Whether TIP2 can form a heterodimer with UDT1, and how these two factors coordinately regulate anther development remain important questions with significant research value.

Wang et al. revealed that UDT1 and TIP2 proteins are localized in overlapping but not entirely identical anther cell layers, suggesting that these two factors have both shared and distinct functions. They further demonstrated that TIP2 can physically interact with UDT1, whereas neither TIP2 nor UDT1 alone possesses transcription activation activity; the TIP2–UDT1 complex is capable of activating target gene expression. These findings provide the first evidence that TIP2 and UDT1 can also heterodimerize to regulate anther development in rice (Fig. 1). This discovery enhances our understanding of the protein regulatory network involved in rice anther development.

The transition from mitosis to meiosis in MMCs involves dramatic cell wall remodeling, which is a critical step for male gametogenesis. During this process, the primary cellulosic walls of MMCs are reorganized and replaced by callose (β-1,3-glucan) (Matsuo et al., 2013). After meiosis, the callose wall is degraded by β-1,3-glucanase (callase), which is synthesized and secreted by tapetal cells to facilitate microspore release (Ariizumi & Toriyama, 2011). While the enzymatic basis for wall degradation is partially understood, the molecular regulatory networks controlling the dynamic callose deposition and degeneration remain poorly defined. Previous studies have reported that udt1, tip2, and tdr mutants in rice display a significant delay in callose degradation (Jung et al., 2005; Fu et al., 2014), indicating that these genes may regulate the synthesis or secretion of callase from the tapetum. Key questions that arise from these observations are how do these transcription factors regulate the synthesis and secretion of callase, and what are the direct target genes of these TFs?

Wang et al. identified a large number of differentially expressed genes through transcriptomic analysis of WT, tip2, and udt1-2 spikelets at Stages 6 and 7. Gene Ontology analysis revealed that carbohydrate-active glycosyltransferases and glycosyl hydrolases were enriched among the shared downregulated genes in two mutants. Among these, two genes, designated OsUPEX1 and OsUPEX2, are specifically expressed in the anther and encode putative β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferases. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that they are homologous to UPEX1/KNS4/RES3 in Arabidopsis and Male sterile8 (Ms8) in maize. In Arabidopsis, UPEX1/KNS4/RES3, which encodes an arabinogalactan β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferase, was initially identified as a key player in pollen wall development and later shown to be involved in callose degradation (Dobritsa et al., 2011; Suzuki et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022). UPEX1/KNS4/RES3 is regulated by ABORTED MICROSPORE (AMS), the ortholog of TDR in Arabidopsis (Wang et al., 2022). In maize, Ms8 regulates both callose remodeling and tapetal cell development (Wang et al., 2010, 2013). Wang et al. demonstrated that the TIP2–UDT1 complex directly binds to the E-box cis-elements in the promoter of OsUPEX1 and OsUPEX2 and activates their expression. While no obvious phenotypic differences were observed between WT and osupex1 or osupex2 single mutants, the osupex1osupex2 double mutants exhibited complete male sterility, with anthers ceasing to grow after stage 8 and lacking pollen at maturity. In the osupex1osupex2 double mutant, meiosis progressed normally with tetrads formation, but microspores collapsed shortly after meiosis. Additionally, tapetal cell structures differed significantly from those in WT from Stage 8. Specifically, the tapetum of the osupex1osupex2 double mutants swelled at Stage 8 and precociously degraded by late Stage 9. At Stages 8a and 8b, callose remodeling in tip2, udt1-2, and osupex1-1 osupex1-2 mutants was impaired, with callose persisting throughout the locule instead of being confined to areas surrounding dyads and tetrads as in WT. These findings suggest that TIP2, UDT1, and OsUPEX1/OsUPEX2 may regulate the secretion of callase from the tapetum into the locule (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the colocalization of OsUPEX1/2 with Golgi markers and the appearance of OsUPEX1/2-GFP as dot signals in tapetal cells suggest that these proteins may be involved in protein glycosylation within the Golgi apparatus and are essential for the general secretory function of the tapetum.

This study fills gaps in our understanding of early anther development by elucidating the TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2 pathway. It underscores the critical role of OsUPEX1/2 in tapetum secretion, offering new perspectives on anther and pollen development. Furthermore, this study reveals the conserved role of OsUPEX1/2 and their orthologs in Arabidopsis (AtUPEX1/KNS4) and maize (ZmMs8), while also highlighting species-specific divergences in their roles in tapetal development and regulatory mechanisms. Despite these advances, this study raises several intriguing scientific questions, such as the need to identify the specific proteins modified by the glycosyltransferase OsUPEX1/2 and elucidate the mechanisms by which it regulates callase secretion.

The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个新的绒毡层发育模块:水稻TIP2‐UDT1‐OsUPEX1/2模块的功能探索
绒毡层通过向小孢子提供营养和信号分子并控制其释放,在花药和花粉的精确发育中起着关键作用(Jung et al., 2005;Ariizumi,Toriyama, 2011)。据报道,许多转录因子可以调节绒毡层的及时降解和水稻花粉的发育(Jung et al., 2005;Li et al., 2006;Niu et al., 2013;Fu et al., 2014;Ko et al., 2014)。然而,调控花药发育的蛋白质之间的具体关系及其直接作用靶点尚不清楚。最近,Wang等人(2025;发表在《New phyologist》上题为“TIP2-UDT1- osupex1 /2 module regulating tapetum development and function in rice”的文章报道,taptum Degeneration Retardation (TDR) INTERACTING PROTEIN (TIP2)可以与Undeveloped Tapetum1 (UDT1)发生物理相互作用。TIP2-UDT1复合物激活OsUPEX1和OsUPEX2的表达,OsUPEX1和OsUPEX2编码β-(1,3)-半乳糖转移酶,并在绒毡层特异性表达。这些发现揭示了TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2在绒毡层发育和花粉形成中的重要作用,为研究水稻雄性生殖发育的分子机制提供了重要线索。本研究通过阐明TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2通路填补了我们对早期花药发育的理解空白。精确控制花药和花粉的发育对繁殖成功至关重要。小孢子母细胞经过减数分裂产生小孢子,小孢子经过两次有丝分裂在花药中央腔发育成成熟的花粉。绒毡层是花药壁的最内层,与雄性配子体的发育密切相关,在小孢子成熟过程中起着重要作用(Jung et al., 2005;Ariizumi,Toriyama, 2011)。先前的研究发现,四种bHLH转录因子调节水稻绒毡层的程序性细胞死亡(PCD)和花粉发育:UDT1、TDR、ETERNAL TAPETUM1 (EAT1)和TIP2 (Jung et al., 2005;Li et al., 2006;Niu et al., 2013;Fu et al., 2014;Ko et al., 2014)。这些bHLH转录因子形成异源二聚体,构成一个前馈转录级联,在水稻的顺序发育阶段调节花药发育。这些因素的突变体在绒毡层的发育和退化中表现出不同程度的缺陷(Jung et al., 2005;Li et al., 2006;Niu et al., 2013;Fu et al., 2014;Ko et al., 2014;Ono et al., 2019)。UDT1和TIP2都在减数分裂前开始表达,对绒毡层的发育和退化至关重要(Jung et al., 2005;傅等人,2014)。TIP2激活TDR,与TDR形成异源二聚体,促进绒毡层分化,并在后期触发绒毡层PCD (Fu etal ., 2014;Ko et al., 2014)。TIP2-TDR复合物直接上调了EAT1的表达,随后形成TDR-EAT1异源二聚体,这是激活绒毡层PCD所必需的(Niu etal ., 2013;Fu et al., 2014;Ko et al., 2014)。UDT1和TIP2都参与了花药壁层发育的早期阶段,它们的突变体表现出相似的缺陷表型。TIP2能否与UDT1形成异源二聚体,以及这两个因子如何协同调控花药发育仍是具有重要研究价值的重要问题。Wang等人发现,UDT1和TIP2蛋白位于重叠但不完全相同的花药细胞层中,这表明这两个因子既有共同的功能,也有不同的功能。他们进一步证明了TIP2可以与UDT1物理相互作用,而TIP2和UDT1单独都不具有转录激活活性;TIP2-UDT1复合体能够激活靶基因的表达。这些发现首次证明了TIP2和UDT1也可以通过异源二聚体调节水稻花药发育(图1)。这一发现增强了我们对水稻花药发育中蛋白质调控网络的理解。水稻绒毡层发育过程中绒毡层变性迟缓(TDR)相互作用蛋白(TIP2) -未发育绒毡层1 (UDT1) -OsUPEX1/2模块的示意图。TIP2和UDT1在绒毡层细胞发育的早期阶段起关键作用。TIP2与UDT1相互作用形成异源二聚体。异源二聚体与OsUPEX1和OsUPEX2启动子中的E-box基序结合。OsUPEX1/2编码假定的半乳糖转移酶,并促进胼胝质酶从绒毡层细胞分泌到房室。愈伤酶通过降解四分体周围的胼胝质,保证四分体的分离,从而保证雄性配子的发育。MMCs从有丝分裂到减数分裂的转变涉及到剧烈的细胞壁重塑,这是雄性配子发生的关键步骤。 在这个过程中,MMCs的原纤维素壁被重组并被胼胝质(β-1,3-葡聚糖)所取代(Matsuo et al., 2013)。减数分裂后,胼胝质壁被绒毡层细胞合成和分泌的β-1,3-葡聚糖酶(callase)降解,以促进小孢子的释放(Ariizumi &amp;Toriyama, 2011)。虽然对细胞壁降解的酶基础已经部分了解,但控制动态胼胝质的沉积和降解的分子调控网络仍然不清楚。先前的研究报道,水稻中的udt1、tip2和tdr突变体在胼胝质降解方面表现出明显的延迟(Jung等人,2005;Fu et al., 2014),表明这些基因可能调控绒毡层中愈伤酶的合成或分泌。从这些观察中产生的关键问题是这些转录因子如何调节callase的合成和分泌,以及这些tf的直接靶基因是什么?Wang等人通过对6期和7期的WT、tip2和udt1-2小穗进行转录组学分析,发现了大量差异表达基因。基因本体分析显示,在两个突变体中,糖基转移酶和糖基水解酶在共有的下调基因中富集。其中,OsUPEX1和OsUPEX2两个基因在花药中特异性表达,编码β-(1,3)-半乳糖转移酶。系统发育分析表明,它们与拟南芥中的UPEX1/KNS4/RES3和玉米中的Ms8同源。在拟南芥中,编码阿拉伯半乳聚糖β-(1,3)-半乳糖转移酶的UPEX1/KNS4/RES3最初被认为是花粉壁发育的关键参与者,后来被证明参与胼质降解(Dobritsa et al., 2011;Suzuki et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2022)。UPEX1/KNS4/RES3受拟南芥TDR同源植物流产小孢子(ABORTED MICROSPORE, AMS)调控(Wang et al., 2022)。在玉米中,Ms8调控胼胝质重塑和绒毡层细胞发育(Wang等,2010,2013)。Wang等人证明TIP2-UDT1复合物直接结合OsUPEX1和OsUPEX2启动子中的E-box顺式元件并激活它们的表达。虽然WT与osupex1或osupex2单突变体之间没有明显的表型差异,但osupex10和osupex2双突变体表现出完全的雄性不育,花药在第8期后停止生长,成熟时缺乏花粉。在osupex10osupex2双突变体中,减数分裂正常进行,四分体形成,但小孢子在减数分裂后很快崩溃。此外,绒毡层细胞结构与第8期的WT有显著差异。具体来说,osupex10osupex2双突变体的绒毡层在第8期膨胀,在第9期晚期早熟退化。在8a和8b阶段,tip2、UDT1 -2和OsUPEX1 -1 OsUPEX1 -2突变体的胼胝质重塑受损,胼胝质持续存在于整个子房室,而不是像WT那样局限于二分体和四分体周围的区域。这些发现表明,tip2、UDT1和OsUPEX1/OsUPEX2可能调节从绒毡层向子房室分泌胼胝质酶(图1)。OsUPEX1/2与高尔基标记物的共定位以及OsUPEX1/2- gfp在绒毡层细胞中作为点信号的出现表明,这些蛋白可能参与高尔基体内的蛋白糖基化,对绒毡层的一般分泌功能至关重要。本研究通过阐明TIP2-UDT1-OsUPEX1/2通路填补了我们对早期花药发育的理解空白。该研究强调了OsUPEX1/2在绒毡层分泌中的关键作用,为花药和花粉发育提供了新的视角。此外,本研究揭示了OsUPEX1/2及其同源基因在拟南芥(AtUPEX1/KNS4)和玉米(ZmMs8)中的保守作用,同时也强调了它们在绒毯发育和调控机制中的作用存在物种特异性差异。尽管取得了这些进展,但本研究提出了几个有趣的科学问题,例如需要鉴定由糖基转移酶OsUPEX1/2修饰的特定蛋白质,并阐明其调节callase分泌的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the relationship between stomatal size and speed across species – a meta‐analysis Genetic architecture of flowering time and perenniality: implications for the origin of wild rice Oryza nivara Mismatch screening in Nicotiana benthamiana to explore Pik‐1/Pik‐2 paired NLR platforms for receptor engineering Low abundance of phytophagous nematodes under invasive exotic Pinus elliottii – enemy release and plant–soil feedbacks Brood pollination mutualism between cryptic‐flower Aspidistra and pollen‐parasite midges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1