Reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for Parkinson's disease

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatric Nursing Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.03.056
Vera Lúcia Santos de Britto PhD , Tatiana Vasconcelos da Silva SPT , Cynthia do Carmo Gomes de Andrade SPT , Larissa de Freitas Domingos SPT , Renan Vicente da Silva SPT , Ana Elisa Lemos Silva MSc , Luiz Felipe Vasconcellos PhD , Ana Paula Fontana PhD , Clynton Lourenço Correa PhD
{"title":"Reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for Parkinson's disease","authors":"Vera Lúcia Santos de Britto PhD ,&nbsp;Tatiana Vasconcelos da Silva SPT ,&nbsp;Cynthia do Carmo Gomes de Andrade SPT ,&nbsp;Larissa de Freitas Domingos SPT ,&nbsp;Renan Vicente da Silva SPT ,&nbsp;Ana Elisa Lemos Silva MSc ,&nbsp;Luiz Felipe Vasconcellos PhD ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Fontana PhD ,&nbsp;Clynton Lourenço Correa PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.03.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Assessment of upper limbs in Parkinson's disease (PD) is mandatory to be considered in clinical practice and research. However, few clinical assessments for upper limbs in PD are available. The objective was to evaluate some measurement properties of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in individuals with PD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional. Intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliabilities were established by analyzing the results from video assessments of the WMFT in patients with PD (<em>n</em> = 50).</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>Excellent intrarater reliability for execution time (intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC&gt; 0.75) and substantial intrarater reliability (weighted Kappa - <em>K</em> = 0.61-0.80) for Functional Ability Scale (FAS) for most WMFT tasks were observed. Test-retest was moderate for execution time (ICC ≤ 0.75). Both tasks 7 and 14 had excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.99). The interrater reliability was considerable for performance, for most WMFT tasks, for FAS (<em>K</em> = 0.21-0.40).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>WMFT showed intrarater and interrater reliabilities to assess the UL in patients with PD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":"63 ","pages":"Pages 422-427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019745722500151X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessment of upper limbs in Parkinson's disease (PD) is mandatory to be considered in clinical practice and research. However, few clinical assessments for upper limbs in PD are available. The objective was to evaluate some measurement properties of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in individuals with PD.

Methods

Cross-sectional. Intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliabilities were established by analyzing the results from video assessments of the WMFT in patients with PD (n = 50).

Results and discussion

Excellent intrarater reliability for execution time (intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC> 0.75) and substantial intrarater reliability (weighted Kappa - K = 0.61-0.80) for Functional Ability Scale (FAS) for most WMFT tasks were observed. Test-retest was moderate for execution time (ICC ≤ 0.75). Both tasks 7 and 14 had excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.99). The interrater reliability was considerable for performance, for most WMFT tasks, for FAS (K = 0.21-0.40).

Conclusions

WMFT showed intrarater and interrater reliabilities to assess the UL in patients with PD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病Wolf运动功能试验的可靠性
背景帕金森病(PD)患者上肢的评估是临床实践和研究中必须考虑的问题。然而,对PD患者上肢的临床评估很少。目的是评估pd患者Wolf运动功能测试(WMFT)的一些测量特性。通过分析PD患者WMFT视频评估的结果(n = 50),建立了内测信度、间测信度和重测信度。执行时间(类内相关系数- ICC>;在大多数WMFT任务中,功能能力量表(FAS)的内部信度(加权Kappa - K = 0.61-0.80)较高。测试-重测在执行时间上是中等的(ICC≤0.75)。任务7和任务14具有极好的重测信度(ICC = 0.99)。对于大多数WMFT任务,对于FAS (K = 0.21-0.40),表现的判读者信度相当可观。结论swmft在评估PD患者UL方面具有内部和内部的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatric Nursing
Geriatric Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
期刊最新文献
Responding to long-term care staffing shortages: Addressing nurse aide turnover through perceived management support The relationships between self-management behavior with psychological distress, health literacy and interoceptive sensibility in stroke survivors: a structural equation model Validation of the Chinese version of the delirium diagnostic tool-provisional (DDT-Pro) among the older adults in the community Palliative care nursing journey in home healthcare: A grounded theory study Internal experience of an aging self: A grounded theory study on women’s aging awareness beyond midlife
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1