Benchmarking and tailoring electric vehicle policies to stimulate adoption

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104074
Joao M. Uratani , Darrick Evensen , Benjamin K. Sovacool , Steve Griffiths
{"title":"Benchmarking and tailoring electric vehicle policies to stimulate adoption","authors":"Joao M. Uratani ,&nbsp;Darrick Evensen ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Sovacool ,&nbsp;Steve Griffiths","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicle (EV) adoption is heralded as one of the most effective solutions for the decarbonization of road transport systems. However, the heterogeneous rate of EV adoption across geographies, coupled with observed or perceived slowdowns in consumer market acceptance, has raised concerns about this technology transition. Utilizing Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory, this paper develops a key component of establishing an EV adoption policy roadmap: policy benchmarking. This paper benchmarks the policy roadmaps of leading countries in EV adoption, as well as those of countries where EV adoption is accelerating or expected to accelerate in the near term. We present this approach in the context of a case study on developing an EV adoption policy roadmap tailored to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The methodology employed provides a generalizable framework for policymakers in any geography seeking to advance EV adoption. Using a sociotechnical perspective, we evaluate the policy mechanisms for their ability to reduce friction points and propose recommendations applicable across diverse contexts. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing necessary infrastructure, particularly for EV charging, alongside the importance of user awareness and education programs that are both tailored to local contexts and adaptable to global best practices. This approach underscores the potential for policymakers to create robust, enduring strategies that accelerate EV adoption globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104074"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric vehicle (EV) adoption is heralded as one of the most effective solutions for the decarbonization of road transport systems. However, the heterogeneous rate of EV adoption across geographies, coupled with observed or perceived slowdowns in consumer market acceptance, has raised concerns about this technology transition. Utilizing Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory, this paper develops a key component of establishing an EV adoption policy roadmap: policy benchmarking. This paper benchmarks the policy roadmaps of leading countries in EV adoption, as well as those of countries where EV adoption is accelerating or expected to accelerate in the near term. We present this approach in the context of a case study on developing an EV adoption policy roadmap tailored to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The methodology employed provides a generalizable framework for policymakers in any geography seeking to advance EV adoption. Using a sociotechnical perspective, we evaluate the policy mechanisms for their ability to reduce friction points and propose recommendations applicable across diverse contexts. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing necessary infrastructure, particularly for EV charging, alongside the importance of user awareness and education programs that are both tailored to local contexts and adaptable to global best practices. This approach underscores the potential for policymakers to create robust, enduring strategies that accelerate EV adoption globally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定和调整电动汽车政策,以刺激采用
电动汽车(EV)的采用被认为是道路运输系统脱碳的最有效解决方案之一。然而,不同地区的电动汽车采用率参差不齐,加上消费者市场接受度的放缓,引发了人们对这种技术转型的担忧。利用罗杰斯的创新扩散理论,本文发展了建立电动汽车采用政策路线图的关键组成部分:政策基准。本文以电动汽车采用领先国家的政策路线图为基准,以及电动汽车采用正在加速或有望在短期内加速的国家的政策路线图。我们在制定针对阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)的电动汽车采用政策路线图的案例研究背景下提出了这种方法。所采用的方法为任何地区寻求推进电动汽车采用的政策制定者提供了一个可推广的框架。从社会技术的角度,我们评估了政策机制减少摩擦点的能力,并提出了适用于不同背景的建议。我们的研究结果强调了建立必要的基础设施的重要性,特别是对于电动汽车充电,以及根据当地情况量身定制并适应全球最佳实践的用户意识和教育计划的重要性。这种方法强调了政策制定者制定稳健、持久的战略以加速全球电动汽车普及的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Repurposing mines for renewable energy: Socio-environmental implications for local communities in Australia and Germany Satisficing devices: Co-benefits in practice to decarbonize New York City's residential buildings Fairing the energy transition: A policy framework for integrating stakeholder concerns in solar energy development The contested political economy of Norway's oil and gas industry Reimagining benefits from climate infrastructure and investments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1