Frequency of lumbopelvic malalignment in symptomatic hip instability and impingement – a prospective, diagnostic cohort study

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05808-w
Maximilian Fischer, Lars Nonnenmacher, Andreas Nitsch, Matthias R. Muehler, Andre Hofer, Georgi I. Wassilew
{"title":"Frequency of lumbopelvic malalignment in symptomatic hip instability and impingement – a prospective, diagnostic cohort study","authors":"Maximilian Fischer,&nbsp;Lars Nonnenmacher,&nbsp;Andreas Nitsch,&nbsp;Matthias R. Muehler,&nbsp;Andre Hofer,&nbsp;Georgi I. Wassilew","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05808-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The dynamic lumbopelvic interaction has gained increasing importance in hip-preserving surgery, even though the coexistence of lumbopelvic malalignment with pre-arthritic hip deformities has been poorly studied. This study aimed to examine (I) the frequency of static and functional lumbopelvic malalignment (II) and to compare the lumbopelvic alignment between symptomatic mild to severe hip dysplasia (HD) and impingement-driven acetabular retroversion (AR).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sagittal lumbopelvic radiographs were reviewed in standing, relaxed-seated and deep-seated position for pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope (SS). Static lumbopelvic alignment was classified as “Flatback”, “Normal”, or “Hyperlordotic” and functional lumbopelvic alignment was categorized as “Stiff”, “Normal”, and “Hypermobile”. Static and functional (Δ between the above-mentioned positions) lumbopelvic parameters were compared among HD, borderline hip dysplasia (BHD), and AR.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-eight patients undergoing hip-preserving surgery for HD (<i>n</i> = 47), BHD (<i>n</i> = 36), and AR (<i>n</i> = 15) were prospectively enrolled. Static lumbopelvic malalignment occurred in 44.9% of patients (44/98), with “Hyperlordotic” alignment being the most frequent (36/44). Additionally, 28.6% of patients (28/98) exhibited functional lumbopelvic malalignment. Static lumbopelvic parameters showed differences between hip instability and impingement, with lower PI (42° vs. 57.3°, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 42° vs. 53.7°, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and PT (5.6° vs. 15.8°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; 5.6° vs. 12.4°, <i>p</i> = 0.01) in AR patients compared to HD and BHD in standing position. Moreover, SS was significantly lower in AR (40.9° vs. 50.1°, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and BHD (43.8° vs. 50.1°, <i>p</i> = 0.05) compared to HD in deep-seated position. Significant differences in functional lumbopelvic parameters were observed only between HD and BHD in PT (Δ standing – deep-seated position, 7.1° vs. -1.2°, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Static and functional lumbopelvic malalignment is prevalent in patients with pre-arthritic hip deformities. While static lumbopelvic parameters vary between instability- and impingement-driven hip deformities, functional lumbopelvic alignment is quite similar among HD, BHD, and AR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05808-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05808-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The dynamic lumbopelvic interaction has gained increasing importance in hip-preserving surgery, even though the coexistence of lumbopelvic malalignment with pre-arthritic hip deformities has been poorly studied. This study aimed to examine (I) the frequency of static and functional lumbopelvic malalignment (II) and to compare the lumbopelvic alignment between symptomatic mild to severe hip dysplasia (HD) and impingement-driven acetabular retroversion (AR).

Methods

Sagittal lumbopelvic radiographs were reviewed in standing, relaxed-seated and deep-seated position for pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope (SS). Static lumbopelvic alignment was classified as “Flatback”, “Normal”, or “Hyperlordotic” and functional lumbopelvic alignment was categorized as “Stiff”, “Normal”, and “Hypermobile”. Static and functional (Δ between the above-mentioned positions) lumbopelvic parameters were compared among HD, borderline hip dysplasia (BHD), and AR.

Results

Ninety-eight patients undergoing hip-preserving surgery for HD (n = 47), BHD (n = 36), and AR (n = 15) were prospectively enrolled. Static lumbopelvic malalignment occurred in 44.9% of patients (44/98), with “Hyperlordotic” alignment being the most frequent (36/44). Additionally, 28.6% of patients (28/98) exhibited functional lumbopelvic malalignment. Static lumbopelvic parameters showed differences between hip instability and impingement, with lower PI (42° vs. 57.3°, p = 0.001; 42° vs. 53.7°, p = 0.01) and PT (5.6° vs. 15.8°, p < 0.001; 5.6° vs. 12.4°, p = 0.01) in AR patients compared to HD and BHD in standing position. Moreover, SS was significantly lower in AR (40.9° vs. 50.1°, p = 0.02) and BHD (43.8° vs. 50.1°, p = 0.05) compared to HD in deep-seated position. Significant differences in functional lumbopelvic parameters were observed only between HD and BHD in PT (Δ standing – deep-seated position, 7.1° vs. -1.2°, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Static and functional lumbopelvic malalignment is prevalent in patients with pre-arthritic hip deformities. While static lumbopelvic parameters vary between instability- and impingement-driven hip deformities, functional lumbopelvic alignment is quite similar among HD, BHD, and AR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有症状的髋关节不稳定和撞击中腰骨盆错位的频率-一项前瞻性诊断队列研究
尽管对腰骨盆错位与关节炎前髋关节畸形共存的研究很少,但动态腰骨盆相互作用在保髋手术中越来越重要。本研究旨在检查(I)静态和功能性腰骨盆错位的频率(II),并比较症状性轻度至重度髋关节发育不良(HD)和撞击驱动的髋臼后倾(AR)的腰骨盆错位。方法回顾性分析站立、放松坐位和深坐位腰骨盆矢状位x线片对骨盆发生率(PI)、骨盆倾斜(PT)、腰椎前凸(LL)和骶骨斜度(SS)的影响。静态腰盂对准被归类为“平背”、“正常”或“过度前凸”,功能性腰盂对准被归类为“僵硬”、“正常”和“过度移动”。比较了HD、边缘性髋关节发育不良(BHD)和AR患者的静态和功能性(上述位置之间的Δ)腰骨盆参数。结果98例因HD (n = 47)、BHD (n = 36)和AR (n = 15)行保髋手术的患者前瞻性入选。44.9%的患者(44/98)出现静态腰盆腔错位,其中“前凸过大”错位最为常见(36/44)。此外,28.6%的患者(28/98)表现出功能性腰骨盆错位。静态腰骨盆参数显示髋关节不稳定和撞击之间的差异,较低的PI(42°vs. 57.3°,p = 0.001;42°和53.7°,p = 0.01)和PT(5.6°和15.8°,p & lt; 0.001;与站立位的HD和BHD患者相比,AR患者的角度为5.6°比12.4°,p = 0.01)。此外,SS在AR(40.9°vs. 50.1°,p = 0.02)和BHD(43.8°vs. 50.1°,p = 0.05)上明显低于HD。仅在PT时,HD和BHD的腰骨盆功能参数有显著差异(Δ站立-深坐位,7.1°vs -1.2°,p = 0.04)。结论静态和功能性腰骨盆错位在髋关节关节炎前畸形患者中普遍存在。虽然不稳定和撞击驱动的髋关节畸形的静态腰骨盆参数不同,但HD、BHD和AR的功能性腰骨盆对齐非常相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
External fixation versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a retrospective comparative study. Post-traumatic Candida infection leading to bilateral wrist rice body tenosynovitis: a case report and literature review. Differences in pelvic tilt and spinal alignment according to age in patients with hip dysplasia. Are new implants for patellar fractures reasonable? A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary locking nails versus tension-band osteosynthesis. Biomechanical comparison of palmar plate plus headless compression screw versus radiopalmar double plating in AO/OTA 23-C2.1 distal radius fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1