Impact of Spray Concentration and Application Frequency to Modulate Phosphonic Acid Residues in Container-Grown Grapevines

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c12228
Sören Otto, Beate Berkelmann-Löhnertz, Bianca May, Randolf Kauer, Ralf Schweiggert
{"title":"Impact of Spray Concentration and Application Frequency to Modulate Phosphonic Acid Residues in Container-Grown Grapevines","authors":"Sören Otto, Beate Berkelmann-Löhnertz, Bianca May, Randolf Kauer, Ralf Schweiggert","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c12228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the translocation and persistence of inorganic phosphonate in container-grown vines of <i>Vitis vinifera</i> L. cv. Riesling after foliar and soil applications over two consecutive years. Phosphonate concentrations were monitored in leaves, petioles, grape canes, shoot tips, inflorescences, and berries during the season, applying an identical total amount of 3 or 4 sprays of 0.54 or 0.4% (w/v, aq) phosphonate, respectively. The overall uptake of inorganic phosphonate into the leaves was either identical (year 1) or substantially lower (year 2) when spraying 3 times (0.54%) instead of 4 times (0.4%) as expressed by the area under the concentration vs time curve. Residues found in leaves at the end of the vegetation period were also lower when spraying 3 times. Across both years, residues in berries were also significantly lower when applying the 0.54% phosphonate solution (20.2–30.9 mg/kg) 3 times as compared with the 4× application of 0.4% phosphonate (38.5–40.6 mg/kg). Soil applications resulted in a comparably low overall uptake but still yielding measurable residues in berries (6.0 ± 1.2 mg/kg). Further data on grape cane, shoot tips, and inflorescences supported the hypothesis that phosphonate residues in the plant and, ultimately, in the berries and the resulting products might be significantly reduced when spraying 3 times (0.54%) instead of 4 times (0.4%).","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c12228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the translocation and persistence of inorganic phosphonate in container-grown vines of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling after foliar and soil applications over two consecutive years. Phosphonate concentrations were monitored in leaves, petioles, grape canes, shoot tips, inflorescences, and berries during the season, applying an identical total amount of 3 or 4 sprays of 0.54 or 0.4% (w/v, aq) phosphonate, respectively. The overall uptake of inorganic phosphonate into the leaves was either identical (year 1) or substantially lower (year 2) when spraying 3 times (0.54%) instead of 4 times (0.4%) as expressed by the area under the concentration vs time curve. Residues found in leaves at the end of the vegetation period were also lower when spraying 3 times. Across both years, residues in berries were also significantly lower when applying the 0.54% phosphonate solution (20.2–30.9 mg/kg) 3 times as compared with the 4× application of 0.4% phosphonate (38.5–40.6 mg/kg). Soil applications resulted in a comparably low overall uptake but still yielding measurable residues in berries (6.0 ± 1.2 mg/kg). Further data on grape cane, shoot tips, and inflorescences supported the hypothesis that phosphonate residues in the plant and, ultimately, in the berries and the resulting products might be significantly reduced when spraying 3 times (0.54%) instead of 4 times (0.4%).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喷施浓度和喷施频率对容器葡萄膦酸残留量的影响
研究了无机膦酸盐在葡萄(Vitis vinifera L. cv)容器栽培植株中的转运和持久性。雷司令经过连续两年的叶面和土壤施用。在这个季节,对叶片、叶柄、葡萄藤、茎尖、花序和浆果中的膦酸盐浓度进行监测,分别施用相同总量的0.54或0.4% (w/v, aq)膦酸盐3或4次喷雾。浓度-时间曲线下面积表示,喷3次(0.54%)而不是喷4次(0.4%)时,叶片对无机膦酸盐的总体吸收量相同(第1年)或显著降低(第2年)。当喷3次时,生长期末叶片残留量也较低。两年中,0.54%膦酸盐溶液(20.2-30.9 mg/kg)施用3次比0.4%膦酸盐溶液(38.5-40.6 mg/kg)施用4次时,浆果中的残留物也显著降低。土壤施用导致总体吸收量相对较低,但仍在浆果中产生可测量的残留物(6.0±1.2 mg/kg)。对葡萄藤、茎尖和花序的进一步数据支持了这样的假设,即喷3次(0.54%)而不是喷4次(0.4%),可以显著减少植株和最终果实中的膦酸盐残留量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.20%
发文量
1375
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.
期刊最新文献
Coassembly of Casein and Xanthan Gum as Nanocarriers for Lutein: Characterization, Interaction Mechanism, pH-Responsive Behavior, and Sustained-Release Potential. Combined Use of Tryptophan and Fu Brick Tea in Low Doses Promotes Weight Loss in Mice by Modulating AhR-Mediated Tryptophan Metabolism and Reshaping the Gut Microbiota. Dynamic Regulation Coupled with Metabolic Pathway Optimization Enables High-Efficiency Lacto-N-fucopentaose I Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Modulation of Fructose Transfer Process for Promoting Apparent Isomerization Activity of Amylosucrase from Bifidobacterium thermophilum. New Lignans with Different Degrees of Polymerization from Alpinia galanga: Their Chiral Resolution, Anti-Inflammatory Activity, and Mechanism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1