Autonomy aweigh: Evaluation metrics and supporting seafarers’ basic psychological needs in energy-efficient route planning DSS

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104518
Mourad Zoubir, Marthe Gruner, Jan Heidinger, Benjamin Schwarz, Hans-Christian Jetter, Thomas Franke
{"title":"Autonomy aweigh: Evaluation metrics and supporting seafarers’ basic psychological needs in energy-efficient route planning DSS","authors":"Mourad Zoubir,&nbsp;Marthe Gruner,&nbsp;Jan Heidinger,&nbsp;Benjamin Schwarz,&nbsp;Hans-Christian Jetter,&nbsp;Thomas Franke","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve necessary CO<sub>2</sub>e emission reductions in the maritime industry, decision support systems (DSS) can assist seafarers in energy-efficient operations. However, adequate evaluation measures beyond classical human–machine interaction (HCI) metrics are required to ensure these systems are human-centered and align with Industry 5.0 goals, including human–machine cooperation and basic psychological needs, especially autonomy. Objectives of this research were (1) to understand how different metrics evaluate route-planning DSS and a route adaptation feature, and (2) to explore autonomy support in DSS usage. Simulator (<em>N</em> = 48) and online (<em>N</em> = 20) studies with experienced seafarers showed HCI metrics alone did not quantify the adaptation feature’s potential. Thematic analysis of interviews highlighted algorithm comprehensiveness, usability, user empowerment, and collaborative workflows as key autonomy aspects. Furthermore, seafarers preferred automated information acquisition and analysis but human decision-making for route planning. We discuss design guidelines to improve autonomy satisfaction for energy-efficient route planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To achieve necessary CO2e emission reductions in the maritime industry, decision support systems (DSS) can assist seafarers in energy-efficient operations. However, adequate evaluation measures beyond classical human–machine interaction (HCI) metrics are required to ensure these systems are human-centered and align with Industry 5.0 goals, including human–machine cooperation and basic psychological needs, especially autonomy. Objectives of this research were (1) to understand how different metrics evaluate route-planning DSS and a route adaptation feature, and (2) to explore autonomy support in DSS usage. Simulator (N = 48) and online (N = 20) studies with experienced seafarers showed HCI metrics alone did not quantify the adaptation feature’s potential. Thematic analysis of interviews highlighted algorithm comprehensiveness, usability, user empowerment, and collaborative workflows as key autonomy aspects. Furthermore, seafarers preferred automated information acquisition and analysis but human decision-making for route planning. We discuss design guidelines to improve autonomy satisfaction for energy-efficient route planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主权衡:节能航线规划DSS中海员基本心理需求的评价指标和支持
为了在航运业实现必要的二氧化碳减排,决策支持系统(DSS)可以帮助海员进行节能操作。然而,除了经典的人机交互(HCI)指标之外,还需要适当的评估措施,以确保这些系统以人为中心,并与工业5.0目标保持一致,包括人机合作和基本心理需求,尤其是自主性。本研究的目的是:(1)了解不同指标如何评估路线规划决策支持系统和路线适应特征;(2)探索决策支持系统使用中的自主性支持。对经验丰富的海员进行的模拟器(N = 48)和在线(N = 20)研究表明,单靠HCI指标并不能量化适应特征的潜力。访谈的专题分析强调了算法的全面性、可用性、用户授权和协作工作流程作为关键的自治方面。此外,海员更倾向于自动获取和分析信息,而不是人工决策。我们讨论了设计准则,以提高节能路线规划的自主满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Pilot response to somatogravic illusion in a simulated environment: Implications for early instrument flight training Independent versus collaborative double-checking for errors on a simulated rail control task Using wearable measures to infer moments in workload from Electrodermal Activity and individual workload from Heart Rate Variability during a simulated railway signalling task Effects of an electric drive wheel on hand forces, muscle activity, spinal load, perceived exertion and usability during hospital bed transport by nursing staff An alternative 6-inch octave keyboard reduces forearm muscle activation level and improves finger postures in expert pianists with smaller hand spans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1