Flexural behavior of reinforced high strength concrete slabs containing glass powder, flay ash, and rice husk ash as cement substitute

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2025-05-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141393
Mahmoud Elsayed , Mustafa Hamada Saad , Mahmoud.A.M. Hassanean
{"title":"Flexural behavior of reinforced high strength concrete slabs containing glass powder, flay ash, and rice husk ash as cement substitute","authors":"Mahmoud Elsayed ,&nbsp;Mustafa Hamada Saad ,&nbsp;Mahmoud.A.M. Hassanean","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study supports a move toward greener construction methods by endorsing sustainable building materials, which can have long-term positive effects on the environment and public health. Utilizing waste materials makes concrete production more environmentally friendly by lowering emissions, landfill usage, and the need for natural resources. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of using glass powder (GP), fly ash (FA), and rice husk ash (RHA) as cement substitutes on the flexural behavior of reinforced high-strength concrete (RHSC) slabs. Ten RHSC slabs with different proportions (0 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 %) of GP, FA, and RHA as cement substitutes were experimentally cast and tested under four-line loading conditions. Experimental results indicated that using FA and RHA as cement alternatives for HSC mixes reduced workability, whereas GP increased it. Test results showed that the HSC mixes containing 15 % GP, 15 % FA, and 10 % RHA had the highest increase in compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths. Incorporating 15 % GP, FA, or RHA enhanced the ultimate load, stiffness, and toughness of the tested RHSC slabs compared to the control slab. Conversely, increasing replacement levels of GP, FA, or RHA to 20 % of cement led to a reduction in ultimate load. The optimal replacement ratios for the RHSC slab are 15 % GP, 15 % FA, or 10 % RHA, which result in acceptable performance of RHSC slabs and protect the environment and natural resources. Finally, the predictions of two methodologies, ACI 318 and ECP 203, were compared with the experimental findings, revealing satisfactory concordance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"477 ","pages":"Article 141393"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825015417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study supports a move toward greener construction methods by endorsing sustainable building materials, which can have long-term positive effects on the environment and public health. Utilizing waste materials makes concrete production more environmentally friendly by lowering emissions, landfill usage, and the need for natural resources. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of using glass powder (GP), fly ash (FA), and rice husk ash (RHA) as cement substitutes on the flexural behavior of reinforced high-strength concrete (RHSC) slabs. Ten RHSC slabs with different proportions (0 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 %) of GP, FA, and RHA as cement substitutes were experimentally cast and tested under four-line loading conditions. Experimental results indicated that using FA and RHA as cement alternatives for HSC mixes reduced workability, whereas GP increased it. Test results showed that the HSC mixes containing 15 % GP, 15 % FA, and 10 % RHA had the highest increase in compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths. Incorporating 15 % GP, FA, or RHA enhanced the ultimate load, stiffness, and toughness of the tested RHSC slabs compared to the control slab. Conversely, increasing replacement levels of GP, FA, or RHA to 20 % of cement led to a reduction in ultimate load. The optimal replacement ratios for the RHSC slab are 15 % GP, 15 % FA, or 10 % RHA, which result in acceptable performance of RHSC slabs and protect the environment and natural resources. Finally, the predictions of two methodologies, ACI 318 and ECP 203, were compared with the experimental findings, revealing satisfactory concordance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以玻璃粉、粉煤灰、稻壳灰为水泥替代品的钢筋高强混凝土板的受弯性能
这项研究通过认可可持续建筑材料,支持向绿色建筑方法的转变,这对环境和公众健康有长期的积极影响。利用废料可以减少排放、填埋和对自然资源的需求,从而使混凝土生产更加环保。本研究的目的是评估玻璃粉(GP)、粉煤灰(FA)和稻壳灰(RHA)作为水泥替代品对增强高强混凝土(RHSC)板抗弯性能的影响。采用不同比例(0 %、10 %、15 %和20 %)的GP、FA和RHA作为水泥替代品,对10块RHSC板进行了四线加载试验。实验结果表明,使用FA和RHA作为HSC混合料的水泥替代品降低了和易性,而GP则提高了和易性。试验结果表明,含15 % GP、15 % FA和10 % RHA的HSC混合料的抗压、抗拉和抗弯强度提高最高。与对照板相比,加入15% % GP、FA或RHA提高了测试RHSC板的极限载荷、刚度和韧性。相反,将GP、FA或RHA的置换量增加到20% %,则会降低最终载荷。RHSC板的最佳替换率为15 % GP、15 % FA和10 % RHA,可使RHSC板的性能达到可接受的水平,并保护了环境和自然资源。最后,将ACI 318和ECP 203两种方法的预测结果与实验结果进行了比较,显示出令人满意的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
C–S–H/Na2SO4 interfacial interactions via molecular dynamics simulation and experiments Hemp shives vs. plastic waste vs. polypropylene fibers in perlite concrete: An experimental comparative study of mechanical performance Correlation-based evaluation of pozzolanic reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials using R³ , SAI, and chemical tests Integrity assessment of masonry dams using ground penetrating radar-based time-energy density approach Degradation mechanism of the bond interface between existing concrete and cast-in-situ repairing agent containing RCA under Mg2+-SO42- corrosion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1