Biodiversity in agroforestry systems implemented in tropical ecoregions: a systematic review

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125317
Ezequiel Ortolan , Everton A. Maciel , Valéria Forni Martins
{"title":"Biodiversity in agroforestry systems implemented in tropical ecoregions: a systematic review","authors":"Ezequiel Ortolan ,&nbsp;Everton A. Maciel ,&nbsp;Valéria Forni Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agroforestry systems enable food production while potentially conserving biodiversity, but it is still unknown how their characteristics, matrix, and ecoregion affect diversity. We aim at understanding biodiversity patterns in agroforestry systems originated from areas with alternative land use and natural vegetation in tropical ecoregions. Through a systematic review, we detected differences between agroforestry systems with the two origins, such as crop type, management strategy, matrix, and ecoregion. Agroforestry systems with the two origins had lower plant richness, tree basal area, and canopy cover than reference areas. We did not find an effect of agroforestry systems on vertebrate richness and only those originated from areas with natural vegetation showed a negative effect on invertebrate richness. The factors affecting species richness varied between agroforestry systems with the two origins and among taxonomic groups. However, in general, agroforestry systems implemented with greater vegetation diversity, with crop types that form more complex vegetation structure, less intensive management, and more permeable matrices had positive effects on species richness. Last, the species richness in agroforestry systems did not increase with increasing natural plant richness of the different ecoregions. We recommend that management strategies that do not greatly modify vegetation structure and resource availability to animals, as well as landscape features that enable the movement of animals and propagules are adopted in agroforestry systems when they aim at environmental management. Importantly, we advocate for the strict prohibition of agroforestry systems implementation in areas with preserved native vegetation due to the negative effects on plant and invertebrate communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 125317"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725012939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry systems enable food production while potentially conserving biodiversity, but it is still unknown how their characteristics, matrix, and ecoregion affect diversity. We aim at understanding biodiversity patterns in agroforestry systems originated from areas with alternative land use and natural vegetation in tropical ecoregions. Through a systematic review, we detected differences between agroforestry systems with the two origins, such as crop type, management strategy, matrix, and ecoregion. Agroforestry systems with the two origins had lower plant richness, tree basal area, and canopy cover than reference areas. We did not find an effect of agroforestry systems on vertebrate richness and only those originated from areas with natural vegetation showed a negative effect on invertebrate richness. The factors affecting species richness varied between agroforestry systems with the two origins and among taxonomic groups. However, in general, agroforestry systems implemented with greater vegetation diversity, with crop types that form more complex vegetation structure, less intensive management, and more permeable matrices had positive effects on species richness. Last, the species richness in agroforestry systems did not increase with increasing natural plant richness of the different ecoregions. We recommend that management strategies that do not greatly modify vegetation structure and resource availability to animals, as well as landscape features that enable the movement of animals and propagules are adopted in agroforestry systems when they aim at environmental management. Importantly, we advocate for the strict prohibition of agroforestry systems implementation in areas with preserved native vegetation due to the negative effects on plant and invertebrate communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带生态区农林业系统的生物多样性:系统综述
农林复合系统在促进粮食生产的同时可能保护生物多样性,但其特征、基质和生态区域如何影响多样性尚不清楚。我们的目标是了解源自热带生态区具有替代土地利用和自然植被的地区的农林业系统的生物多样性模式。通过系统回顾,我们发现了两个起源的农林业系统之间的差异,如作物类型、管理策略、基质和生态区域。两种来源的农林业系统的植物丰富度、树基面积和冠层盖度均低于对照区。我们没有发现农林业系统对脊椎动物丰富度的影响,只有那些起源于自然植被地区的农林业系统对无脊椎动物丰富度有负面影响。影响物种丰富度的因素在不同来源的农林业系统和不同分类类群之间存在差异。但总体而言,植被多样性较高、植被结构复杂、集约化管理程度较低、基质渗透性较强的农林复合系统对物种丰富度有积极影响。最后,农林业系统的物种丰富度不随不同生态区自然植物丰富度的增加而增加。我们建议,当农林复合系统以环境管理为目标时,应采用不会大大改变植被结构和动物可利用资源的管理策略,以及使动物和繁殖体能够活动的景观特征。重要的是,由于对植物和无脊椎动物群落的负面影响,我们主张严格禁止在保留原生植被的地区实施农林复合系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Performance-informed life cycle assessment of waste-derived asphalt mixtures for full aggregate replacement Antimicrobial resistance genes in biosolid-amended pasture soils: Insights from a pilot study on a sheep farm Response strategies of bacterial and micro-eukaryotic communities to environmental changes: Evidence from alpine lakes sedimentary DNA in Southwest China Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification microbial fuel cells (SND-MFC) for nitrogen removal and bioelectricity recovery: a review of performances, mechanisms, microorganisms, and applications Response of microbial nitrogen removal to sinuosity in river bends: mechanisms and development of physics-informed neural networks model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1