Socio-Environmental conflicts and traditional communities in protected areas: A scientometric analysis

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126936
Everton Cruz Silva , Mayerly Alexandra Guerrero-Moreno , Fernando Abreu Oliveira , Karina Dias-Silva , Leandro Juen , James Ferreira Moura Junior , Fernando Geraldo de Carvalho , José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior
{"title":"Socio-Environmental conflicts and traditional communities in protected areas: A scientometric analysis","authors":"Everton Cruz Silva ,&nbsp;Mayerly Alexandra Guerrero-Moreno ,&nbsp;Fernando Abreu Oliveira ,&nbsp;Karina Dias-Silva ,&nbsp;Leandro Juen ,&nbsp;James Ferreira Moura Junior ,&nbsp;Fernando Geraldo de Carvalho ,&nbsp;José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although science recognizes that traditional communities are essential for the sustainable management of areas of high biodiversity, they are often neglected in the creation and management of protected areas (PAs), leading to a series of social and environmental tensions. In this context, this study aims to analyze the socio-environmental conflicts involving traditional communities in PAs using a scientometric approach. A total of 263 articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed. The highest scientific productivity was recorded in 2021 (<em>n</em> = 22; 8.37 %). The USA (<em>n</em> = 36; 13.69) had the most scientific output, while Brazil (<em>n</em> = 26; 9.89 %) was the most studied. The thematic map identifies “protected areas” as the central theme, ”indigenous communities“ as a crucial topic, and ”marine protected areas“ as an emerging theme. A percentage of 66.54 % of the studies focused on non-indigenous populations, 16.73 % on indigenous populations, and 16.73 % on both. There was a significant predominance of conflicts involving reserves (50.19 %). The most recurrent socio-environmental conflict is related to access to resources and livelihoods (27.37). The results underscore the urgent need for management strategies and the development of more inclusive public policies that meet the needs and ensure the rights of traditional communities for their well-being. It is essential to actively integrate them into decision-making processes; by adopting this action, it is possible to reduce conflicts and significantly promote the sustainability of protected areas. This approach not only recognizes the importance of these communities but also strengthens the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713812500113X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although science recognizes that traditional communities are essential for the sustainable management of areas of high biodiversity, they are often neglected in the creation and management of protected areas (PAs), leading to a series of social and environmental tensions. In this context, this study aims to analyze the socio-environmental conflicts involving traditional communities in PAs using a scientometric approach. A total of 263 articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed. The highest scientific productivity was recorded in 2021 (n = 22; 8.37 %). The USA (n = 36; 13.69) had the most scientific output, while Brazil (n = 26; 9.89 %) was the most studied. The thematic map identifies “protected areas” as the central theme, ”indigenous communities“ as a crucial topic, and ”marine protected areas“ as an emerging theme. A percentage of 66.54 % of the studies focused on non-indigenous populations, 16.73 % on indigenous populations, and 16.73 % on both. There was a significant predominance of conflicts involving reserves (50.19 %). The most recurrent socio-environmental conflict is related to access to resources and livelihoods (27.37). The results underscore the urgent need for management strategies and the development of more inclusive public policies that meet the needs and ensure the rights of traditional communities for their well-being. It is essential to actively integrate them into decision-making processes; by adopting this action, it is possible to reduce conflicts and significantly promote the sustainability of protected areas. This approach not only recognizes the importance of these communities but also strengthens the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会环境冲突与保护区传统社区:科学计量分析
尽管科学认识到传统社区对于生物多样性高的地区的可持续管理至关重要,但它们在保护区的创建和管理中往往被忽视,导致一系列社会和环境紧张局势。在此背景下,本研究旨在运用科学计量学方法分析保护区传统社区的社会环境冲突。共分析了来自Scopus和Web of Science数据库的263篇文章。科学生产力最高的年份是2021年(n = 22;8.37%)。美国(n = 36;13.69)的科学产出最多,而巴西(n = 26;9.89%)是研究最多的。该专题地图确定“保护区”为中心主题,“土著社区”为关键主题,“海洋保护区”为新兴主题。66.54%的研究集中在非土著人口上,16.73%集中在土著人口上,16.73%集中在两者上。涉及储备的冲突占显著优势(50.19%)。最经常发生的社会环境冲突与获得资源和生计有关(27.37)。研究结果强调,迫切需要制定管理战略和制定更具包容性的公共政策,以满足传统社区的需求并确保其福祉的权利。必须将它们积极纳入决策进程;通过采取这一行动,有可能减少冲突,并显著促进保护区的可持续性。这种做法不仅认识到这些社区的重要性,而且还加强了自然资源的保护和可持续利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Hormonally active contaminants in urban protected areas: lessons to learn from COVID-19 lockdown Spatial and temporal variation of corrected ecosystem services values and ecological compensations under land use changes in Shaanxi Province, China Georeferenced diversity data of ferns and lycophytes as indicators for prioritizing conservation efforts and monitoring tourism activities in a Brazilian National Park Under pressure: assessing the vulnerability of two wetland birds to climate change Seed traits and germination ecology of the rare steno-endemic Centaurea pangaea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1