Does methylene blue affect culture yield in total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05794-z
Jordan Villa, Spencer Ward, Zoe Alpert, Ran Schwarzkopf, Vinay Aggarwal, Joshua C. Rozell
{"title":"Does methylene blue affect culture yield in total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection?","authors":"Jordan Villa,&nbsp;Spencer Ward,&nbsp;Zoe Alpert,&nbsp;Ran Schwarzkopf,&nbsp;Vinay Aggarwal,&nbsp;Joshua C. Rozell","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05794-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Methylene blue (MB), a phenothiazine dye with antimicrobial activity, is used to stain soft tissues and guide thoroughness of debridement during revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to determine if instillation of MB prior to arthrotomy impacts culture yield in TKA PJI.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed 266 patients diagnosed with TKA PJIs according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria from January 2018 – March 2023 at a single academic hospital. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, and preoperative and intraoperative culture positivity were compared between patients who received intraoperative MB (MB group; n = 26) and those who did not (nMB group; n = 241). A record of detected organisms was included in the analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference in preoperative aspiration culture positivity between groups. However, the MB group had a higher percentage of preoperative to intraoperative culture concordance (89.5 vs. 69.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.04). Although the overall rate of intraoperative culture positivity did not differ significantly between groups, the MB group had more intraoperative cultures obtained per patient (4.9 vs. 4.5; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and higher numbers of positive intraoperative cultures per patient. Concordance rates for patients in both groups with positive preoperative and negative intraoperative cultures were similar (10.5 vs. 16.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.50). Among patients with negative preoperative cultures, intraoperative culture positivity was more discordant in the MB group (0 vs. 18.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.03). There was no difference in the number of patients that received antibiotics following aspiration (68.4 vs. 49.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.12).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While MB use did not affect overall culture positivity, it could interfere with intraoperative pathogen detection in patients with negative preoperative cultures. In these cases, MB should be avoided to decrease inaccuracies in intraoperative culture yield. If preoperative cultures are positive, MB may improve surgical debridement and likelihood of infection eradication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05794-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Methylene blue (MB), a phenothiazine dye with antimicrobial activity, is used to stain soft tissues and guide thoroughness of debridement during revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to determine if instillation of MB prior to arthrotomy impacts culture yield in TKA PJI.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 266 patients diagnosed with TKA PJIs according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria from January 2018 – March 2023 at a single academic hospital. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, and preoperative and intraoperative culture positivity were compared between patients who received intraoperative MB (MB group; n = 26) and those who did not (nMB group; n = 241). A record of detected organisms was included in the analysis.

Results

There was no difference in preoperative aspiration culture positivity between groups. However, the MB group had a higher percentage of preoperative to intraoperative culture concordance (89.5 vs. 69.9%; P = 0.04). Although the overall rate of intraoperative culture positivity did not differ significantly between groups, the MB group had more intraoperative cultures obtained per patient (4.9 vs. 4.5; P = 0.02) and higher numbers of positive intraoperative cultures per patient. Concordance rates for patients in both groups with positive preoperative and negative intraoperative cultures were similar (10.5 vs. 16.5%, P = 0.50). Among patients with negative preoperative cultures, intraoperative culture positivity was more discordant in the MB group (0 vs. 18.8%; P = 0.03). There was no difference in the number of patients that received antibiotics following aspiration (68.4 vs. 49.6%; P = 0.12).

Conclusion

While MB use did not affect overall culture positivity, it could interfere with intraoperative pathogen detection in patients with negative preoperative cultures. In these cases, MB should be avoided to decrease inaccuracies in intraoperative culture yield. If preoperative cultures are positive, MB may improve surgical debridement and likelihood of infection eradication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚甲基蓝是否影响全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染的培养产量?
亚甲基蓝(MB)是一种具有抗菌活性的吩噻嗪染料,用于全膝关节置换术(rTKA)修复假体周围关节感染(PJI)期间软组织染色和指导彻底清创。本研究的目的是确定关节切开术前注入MB是否会影响TKA PJI的培养物产量。方法回顾性分析了2018年1月至2023年3月在一家学术医院根据2018年国际共识会议(ICM)标准诊断为TKA PJIs的266例患者。比较术中MB组患者的人口学特征、围手术期结局、术前和术中培养阳性(MB组;n = 26),对照组(nMB组;n = 241)。分析中包含了检测到的生物体的记录。结果两组术前吸痰培养阳性率无差异。然而,MB组术前与术中培养一致性百分比更高(89.5%比69.9%;p = 0.04)。尽管两组间术中培养总体阳性率无显著差异,但MB组每位患者获得的术中培养更多(4.9 vs 4.5;P = 0.02),且每位患者术中培养阳性数更高。两组术前培养阳性和术中培养阴性患者的一致性率相似(10.5% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.50)。在术前培养阴性的患者中,MB组术中培养阳性更不一致(0比18.8%;p = 0.03)。吸入后接受抗生素治疗的患者数量无差异(68.4 vs 49.6%;p = 0.12)。结论使用MB对术前培养阴性患者术中病原菌检测有干扰作用,但对整体培养阳性无影响。在这种情况下,应避免MB,以减少术中培养率的不准确性。如果术前培养阳性,MB可能改善手术清创和感染根除的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Pelvic insufficiency fractures after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer in female patients: an updated meta-analysis of 11,272 patients. The ulna osteotomy locking plate II in patients with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome: a retrospective evaluation. Tranexamic acid reduces transfusion requirements after pelvic osteotomy: a nationwide propensity score-matched analysis. Revision rate of large head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: long-term results Influence of different preservation methods on the mechanical in vitro stability of bones: a comparative study using porcine metatarsals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1