Forest productivity response to elevated CO2 in free-air CO2 enrichment experiments: the 23 percent solution, revisited

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-04-20 DOI:10.1111/nph.70162
Richard J. Norby
{"title":"Forest productivity response to elevated CO2 in free-air CO2 enrichment experiments: the 23 percent solution, revisited","authors":"Richard J. Norby","doi":"10.1111/nph.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A synthesis of free-air CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment (FACE) experiments describing the response of forest net primary productivity (NPP) to elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> published in 2005 has provided a valuable benchmark for ecosystem models used to address the impact of future atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> levels on forest productivity and the feedback to the atmosphere and climate change. However, that analysis was limited to young, temperate zone tree plantations, and its applicability to other biomes can be questioned. Now, after 20 years, this new analysis includes two sites in much older, mature forests and expanded and updated analyses from the original sites. The original conclusion from 2005 remains valid with only a minor modification. After normalizing to a common CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment of 41%, NPP increased 21.8% in elevated CO<sub>2</sub> across a wide range of forest productivity. The response declined with increasing mean annual temperature, but did not decline with forest age as expected. The response of wood production (18.2%) was somewhat less than that of NPP, but there was no evidence of a CO<sub>2</sub> effect on carbon allocation between long- and short-term carbon pools. This analysis should inform and generate testable hypotheses for new FACE experiments such as the AmazonFACE experiment in a tropical forest.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"246 5","pages":"1952-1959"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nph.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A synthesis of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments describing the response of forest net primary productivity (NPP) to elevated atmospheric CO2 published in 2005 has provided a valuable benchmark for ecosystem models used to address the impact of future atmospheric CO2 levels on forest productivity and the feedback to the atmosphere and climate change. However, that analysis was limited to young, temperate zone tree plantations, and its applicability to other biomes can be questioned. Now, after 20 years, this new analysis includes two sites in much older, mature forests and expanded and updated analyses from the original sites. The original conclusion from 2005 remains valid with only a minor modification. After normalizing to a common CO2 enrichment of 41%, NPP increased 21.8% in elevated CO2 across a wide range of forest productivity. The response declined with increasing mean annual temperature, but did not decline with forest age as expected. The response of wood production (18.2%) was somewhat less than that of NPP, but there was no evidence of a CO2 effect on carbon allocation between long- and short-term carbon pools. This analysis should inform and generate testable hypotheses for new FACE experiments such as the AmazonFACE experiment in a tropical forest.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林生产力对自由空气中二氧化碳富集实验中二氧化碳浓度升高的反应:23%的溶液,再访
2005年发表的一项描述森林净初级生产力(NPP)对大气CO2升高响应的自由空气CO2富集(FACE)综合实验,为用于解决未来大气CO2水平对森林生产力的影响以及对大气和气候变化的反馈的生态系统模型提供了有价值的基准。然而,该分析仅限于年轻的温带人工林,其对其他生物群系的适用性值得质疑。现在,在20年之后,这个新的分析包括了两个更古老、更成熟的森林,以及从原始地点扩展和更新的分析。2005年的原始结论只做了微小的修改,仍然有效。在将二氧化碳浓度归一化到41%后,在广泛的森林生产力范围内,二氧化碳浓度升高的NPP增加了21.8%。响应随年平均气温的升高而下降,但不随林龄的增加而下降。木材产量的响应(18.2%)略低于NPP,但没有证据表明CO2对长期和短期碳库之间的碳分配有影响。这种分析应该为新的FACE实验提供信息并产生可测试的假设,例如热带森林中的AmazonFACE实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
L‐ DOPA elicits iron deficiency response through root‐to‐shoot signaling and independently of the canonical regulatory pathway Ecological predictors of plant responses to sequential herbivory: a meta‐analysis The New Phytologist Tansley Medal 2025 – Camille S. Delavaux Transfer cells in Horneophyton lignieri illuminate the origin of vascular tissues in land plants Camille S. Delavaux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1