Enhancing sediment toxicity assessments: Integrating bioavailability metrics with sediment effect concentrations for improved predictive accuracy

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Pollution Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126285
Buyun Jeong , Jinsung An , Kyoungphile Nam
{"title":"Enhancing sediment toxicity assessments: Integrating bioavailability metrics with sediment effect concentrations for improved predictive accuracy","authors":"Buyun Jeong ,&nbsp;Jinsung An ,&nbsp;Kyoungphile Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediments act as both sinks and sources for contaminants, particularly heavy metals like cadmium (Cd), posing risks to aquatic ecosystems. To evaluate sediment toxicity, sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) such as Sediment Effect Concentrations (SECs) have been widely applied. However, these methods often fail to resolve toxicity in the \"Uncertain\" range, where contaminant concentrations approach threshold values. This limitation arises from the reliance on bulk sediment concentrations, which do not account for bioavailability. This study integrates bioavailability-focused evaluation using Interstitial Water Toxic Units (IWTU) with traditional SEC frameworks to enhance sediment toxicity assessments. Using SECs alone, the toxicity thresholds were 0.09 mg/kg for long-term ecological safety (Consensus Level 1) and 0.36 mg/kg for benthic communities (Consensus Level 2). However, predictability, defined as the ability to correctly classify sediments correctly based on bioassay results, was limited to 43 % due to ambiguity in the \"grey area\" between these thresholds. To address this, aqueous phase Cd concentrations, derived from a partitioning coefficient model, were normalized to the USEPA Final Chronic Value (FCV) of 0.72 μg/L to calculate IWTU values. This tiered approach integrates SECs with bioavailability-focused assessments, improving predictability to 76 % by refining classifications in the \"Uncertain\" category. The proposed framework effectively combines the ecological breadth of SECs with the precision of IWTU, addressing the limitations of single-method approaches. These findings underscore the importance of bioavailability-focused metrics in enhancing the reliability of sediment toxicity assessments and management practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 126285"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026974912500658X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sediments act as both sinks and sources for contaminants, particularly heavy metals like cadmium (Cd), posing risks to aquatic ecosystems. To evaluate sediment toxicity, sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) such as Sediment Effect Concentrations (SECs) have been widely applied. However, these methods often fail to resolve toxicity in the "Uncertain" range, where contaminant concentrations approach threshold values. This limitation arises from the reliance on bulk sediment concentrations, which do not account for bioavailability. This study integrates bioavailability-focused evaluation using Interstitial Water Toxic Units (IWTU) with traditional SEC frameworks to enhance sediment toxicity assessments. Using SECs alone, the toxicity thresholds were 0.09 mg/kg for long-term ecological safety (Consensus Level 1) and 0.36 mg/kg for benthic communities (Consensus Level 2). However, predictability, defined as the ability to correctly classify sediments correctly based on bioassay results, was limited to 43 % due to ambiguity in the "grey area" between these thresholds. To address this, aqueous phase Cd concentrations, derived from a partitioning coefficient model, were normalized to the USEPA Final Chronic Value (FCV) of 0.72 μg/L to calculate IWTU values. This tiered approach integrates SECs with bioavailability-focused assessments, improving predictability to 76 % by refining classifications in the "Uncertain" category. The proposed framework effectively combines the ecological breadth of SECs with the precision of IWTU, addressing the limitations of single-method approaches. These findings underscore the importance of bioavailability-focused metrics in enhancing the reliability of sediment toxicity assessments and management practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强沉积物毒性评估:将生物利用度指标与沉积物效应浓度相结合以提高预测准确性
沉积物既是污染物的汇,也是污染物的来源,尤其是镉等重金属,对水生生态系统构成威胁。为了评价沉积物的毒性,泥沙质量准则(SQGs)如泥沙效应浓度(SECs)已被广泛应用。然而,这些方法往往不能解决“不确定”范围内的毒性问题,即污染物浓度接近阈值。这种限制源于对散装沉积物浓度的依赖,而这些浓度没有考虑到生物利用度。本研究将利用间质水毒性单位(IWTU)的生物利用度评价与传统的SEC框架相结合,以加强沉积物毒性评价。单独使用SECs,长期生态安全的毒性阈值为0.09 mg/kg(共识级别1),底栖生物群落的毒性阈值为0.36 mg/kg(共识级别2)。然而,可预测性(定义为根据生物测定结果正确分类沉积物的能力)由于这些阈值之间的“灰色地带”的模糊性,限制在43%。为了解决这个问题,根据分配系数模型,将水相Cd浓度归一化为USEPA最终慢性值(FCV) 0.72 μg/L,以计算IWTU值。这种分层方法将SECs与以生物利用度为重点的评估相结合,通过细化“不确定”类别的分类,将可预测性提高到76%。所提出的框架有效地将SECs的生态广度与IWTU的精度结合起来,解决了单一方法方法的局限性。这些发现强调了以生物利用度为重点的指标在提高沉积物毒性评估和管理实践的可靠性方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
期刊最新文献
Structural analogs TOCP and TPHP induce immunotoxicity in zebrafish through divergent disruption of energy metabolism Degradation of polyethylene terephthalate bottle fragments in the marine environment: An empirical study of structural and chemical changes Distribution, source, and pollution risk assessment of heavy metals in the coastal sediments of the northern South China sea Warming altered the variational effects of microplastics and leachate from biodegradable mulch films on organic carbon transformation in riparian zones From mechanism to molecule: Atmospheric and aqueous degradation kinetics, toxicity assessment, and sustainable redesign of the flame retardant TDCPP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1