Sacred natural sites as other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMS) for biodiversity conservation in South Africa: Key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126935
Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule
{"title":"Sacred natural sites as other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMS) for biodiversity conservation in South Africa: Key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice","authors":"Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The focus of this study is on sacred natural sites (SNS’s) as other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) in South Africa. The global recognition of OECMs Kunming-Montrel Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3 is an important milestone in the global conservation arena. The recognition of OECMs as an essential supplementary strategy to protected areas is a critical step towards conservation. This study aimed to assess opinions and perceptions about the opportunities and challenges of SNS’s as OECMs in contributing to global conservation goals and targets. Semi-structured interviews were used as the main collection tool (either face-to-face or remotely) to elicit perceptions, judgements and feelings from academics involved in research on Indigenous knowledge, people involved in discussions related to OECMs, and the custodians of sacred sites. Recruitment of experts was undertaken using a mixture of non-probability purposive and snowball sampling. Experts were purposefully selected after which they were requested to refer us to other stakeholders/respondents who were also involved in projects related to OECMs. The study identified several opportunities and challenges that need to be addressed if SNS’s are to be designated as OECMs. Although there is potential for recognising SNS’s as OECMs, there are no standard criteria or guidelines available at the local or national level in South Africa for declaring SNS’s as OECMs. This highlights a policy gap within the existing legal structure. The lack of clear policy frameworks and guidelines specifically designed for OECMs in South Africa creates implementation uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125001128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of this study is on sacred natural sites (SNS’s) as other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) in South Africa. The global recognition of OECMs Kunming-Montrel Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3 is an important milestone in the global conservation arena. The recognition of OECMs as an essential supplementary strategy to protected areas is a critical step towards conservation. This study aimed to assess opinions and perceptions about the opportunities and challenges of SNS’s as OECMs in contributing to global conservation goals and targets. Semi-structured interviews were used as the main collection tool (either face-to-face or remotely) to elicit perceptions, judgements and feelings from academics involved in research on Indigenous knowledge, people involved in discussions related to OECMs, and the custodians of sacred sites. Recruitment of experts was undertaken using a mixture of non-probability purposive and snowball sampling. Experts were purposefully selected after which they were requested to refer us to other stakeholders/respondents who were also involved in projects related to OECMs. The study identified several opportunities and challenges that need to be addressed if SNS’s are to be designated as OECMs. Although there is potential for recognising SNS’s as OECMs, there are no standard criteria or guidelines available at the local or national level in South Africa for declaring SNS’s as OECMs. This highlights a policy gap within the existing legal structure. The lack of clear policy frameworks and guidelines specifically designed for OECMs in South Africa creates implementation uncertainties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为南非生物多样性保护的其他有效区域保护措施(OECMS)的神圣自然遗址:政策和实践的关键机遇和挑战
本研究的重点是神圣的自然遗址(SNS)作为其他有效的基于区域的保护措施(oecm)在南非。oecm昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架目标3的全球认可是全球生物保护领域的一个重要里程碑。承认东加勒比国家基金是保护区的一项重要补充战略,是迈向保护的关键一步。本研究旨在评估关于SNS作为oecm在促进全球保护目标和指标方面的机遇和挑战的意见和看法。半结构化访谈被用作主要的收集工具(面对面或远程),以从参与土著知识研究的学者、参与与oecm有关的讨论的人以及圣地的监护人那里获得感知、判断和感受。专家的招募是采用非概率目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的混合方法进行的。有目的地选择专家后,请他们将我们介绍给也参与与oecm相关项目的其他利益相关者/受访者。该研究确定了如果SNS被指定为oecm,需要解决的几个机遇和挑战。虽然有可能承认SNS为oecm,但在南非地方或国家层面上没有宣布SNS为oecm的标准或指南。这突出了现有法律结构中的政策差距。在南非缺乏专门为东安组织成员国设计的明确政策框架和指导方针,造成了执行的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Hormonally active contaminants in urban protected areas: lessons to learn from COVID-19 lockdown Spatial and temporal variation of corrected ecosystem services values and ecological compensations under land use changes in Shaanxi Province, China Georeferenced diversity data of ferns and lycophytes as indicators for prioritizing conservation efforts and monitoring tourism activities in a Brazilian National Park Under pressure: assessing the vulnerability of two wetland birds to climate change Seed traits and germination ecology of the rare steno-endemic Centaurea pangaea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1