Soil organic carbon fractions response to ecological restoration: A global meta-analysis

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107661
Jiachen Pan , Xiaocheng Wu , Sishi Zou , Zexin Shen , Qicong Wu , Zhi Dong , Xiaoping Guo
{"title":"Soil organic carbon fractions response to ecological restoration: A global meta-analysis","authors":"Jiachen Pan ,&nbsp;Xiaocheng Wu ,&nbsp;Sishi Zou ,&nbsp;Zexin Shen ,&nbsp;Qicong Wu ,&nbsp;Zhi Dong ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil organic carbon (SOC) has a critical influence on soil productivity and degradation. Meanwhile, ecological restoration is essential to prevent carbon (C) losses and reverse land degradation. In this study, 1374 sets of experimental data from 63 peer-reviewed publications were synthesized to quantitatively elucidate the effects of different restoration measures on soil properties and SOC fractions. The results showed that ecological restoration significantly increased SOC, particulate organic carbon (POC), and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) by 37.48 %, 45.73 %, and 36.42 %, respectively. Interventional restoration measured the sequestered carbon in POC at a rate of 50.7 %, which was 17.1 % higher than that achieved through natural restoration. In the tropics, the effect of ecological restoration on MAOC was not significant. In addition, soil texture, soil depth, and restoration duration were important factors regulating the global SOC response to ecological restoration. In summary, the use of ecological restoration to achieve C recovery represents a site-specific application of both proactive and natural strategies. The meta-analysis advances our understanding of how SOC pools respond to various restoration measures and enhances the prediction of restoration outcomes under climate change scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 107661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) has a critical influence on soil productivity and degradation. Meanwhile, ecological restoration is essential to prevent carbon (C) losses and reverse land degradation. In this study, 1374 sets of experimental data from 63 peer-reviewed publications were synthesized to quantitatively elucidate the effects of different restoration measures on soil properties and SOC fractions. The results showed that ecological restoration significantly increased SOC, particulate organic carbon (POC), and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) by 37.48 %, 45.73 %, and 36.42 %, respectively. Interventional restoration measured the sequestered carbon in POC at a rate of 50.7 %, which was 17.1 % higher than that achieved through natural restoration. In the tropics, the effect of ecological restoration on MAOC was not significant. In addition, soil texture, soil depth, and restoration duration were important factors regulating the global SOC response to ecological restoration. In summary, the use of ecological restoration to achieve C recovery represents a site-specific application of both proactive and natural strategies. The meta-analysis advances our understanding of how SOC pools respond to various restoration measures and enhances the prediction of restoration outcomes under climate change scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤有机碳组分对生态恢复的响应:一个全球元分析
土壤有机碳(SOC)对土壤生产力和退化具有重要影响。同时,生态恢复对于防止碳(C)流失和逆转土地退化至关重要。本研究综合了63篇同行评议论文的1374组实验数据,定量阐明了不同修复措施对土壤性质和有机碳组分的影响。结果表明,生态恢复显著提高了土壤有机碳、颗粒有机碳(POC)和矿物相关有机碳(MAOC),分别提高了37.48%、45.73%和36.42%。介入修复测量POC固碳率为50.7%,比自然修复高17.1%。在热带地区,生态恢复对MAOC的影响不显著。此外,土壤质地、土壤深度和恢复持续时间是影响全球土壤有机碳对生态恢复响应的重要因素。综上所述,利用生态恢复来实现C的恢复代表了主动和自然策略在特定地点的应用。通过meta分析,我们进一步了解了土壤有机碳库对各种恢复措施的响应,并增强了对气候变化情景下恢复结果的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing agricultural soil fertility and improving crop yield with the sediment dredged from the treatment wetland Modeling cumulative and spatially-varying nitrate removal from multiple floodplain restoration projects in a 4th-order river channel network Long-term assessment of chestnut live cribwalls deterioration using drilling resistance measurements Enhancing urban wastewater treatment through nature-based solutions: The role of biofilm–plant development in subsurface retention of multiple solutes Coastal protection service of a seagrass meadow in a fetch-limited, non-tidal environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1