Evaluation of diatomite substitute with thermal power plant waste fly ash in sustainable geopolymer through life cycle assessment

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s10163-025-02184-w
Serhan Ilkentapar, Ezgi Örklemez, Ugur Durak, Sedat Gülçimen, Savaş Bayram, Niğmet Uzal, Burak Uzal, Okan Karahan, Cengiz Duran Atis
{"title":"Evaluation of diatomite substitute with thermal power plant waste fly ash in sustainable geopolymer through life cycle assessment","authors":"Serhan Ilkentapar,&nbsp;Ezgi Örklemez,&nbsp;Ugur Durak,&nbsp;Sedat Gülçimen,&nbsp;Savaş Bayram,&nbsp;Niğmet Uzal,&nbsp;Burak Uzal,&nbsp;Okan Karahan,&nbsp;Cengiz Duran Atis","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02184-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research demonstrates the potential of diatomite as a fly ash replacement to improve mechanical properties and environmental sustainability and presents it as a viable alternative for sustainable construction. Additionally, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted on the produced mortars to quantitatively compare their environmental impacts using a cradle-to-gate approach. In mixtures, it was used by replacing the diatomite in the ratios of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% by weight of the fly ash. Workability, unit weight, flexural and compressive strength, abrasion resistance, elevated temperature resistance and microstructure analysis were carried out. The results indicated that replacing 1%, 2%, and 3% diatomite increased the compressive and flexural strength of mortars due to their higher specific surface area. Two percent replacement of diatomite provided the best results. FESEM results of 3% diatomite inclusion showed more intense and compact microstructure of geopolymer. Diatomite inclusion increased the abrasion resistance of geopolymer. Since 2% diatomite replacement was found to be optimum, the LCA results showed that geopolymer mortar with 2% diatomite has 25% lower impacts in terms of global warming potential and 10% lower impacts in terms of terrestrial ecotoxicity than conventional Portland cement mortar.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 3","pages":"1418 - 1435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02184-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research demonstrates the potential of diatomite as a fly ash replacement to improve mechanical properties and environmental sustainability and presents it as a viable alternative for sustainable construction. Additionally, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted on the produced mortars to quantitatively compare their environmental impacts using a cradle-to-gate approach. In mixtures, it was used by replacing the diatomite in the ratios of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% by weight of the fly ash. Workability, unit weight, flexural and compressive strength, abrasion resistance, elevated temperature resistance and microstructure analysis were carried out. The results indicated that replacing 1%, 2%, and 3% diatomite increased the compressive and flexural strength of mortars due to their higher specific surface area. Two percent replacement of diatomite provided the best results. FESEM results of 3% diatomite inclusion showed more intense and compact microstructure of geopolymer. Diatomite inclusion increased the abrasion resistance of geopolymer. Since 2% diatomite replacement was found to be optimum, the LCA results showed that geopolymer mortar with 2% diatomite has 25% lower impacts in terms of global warming potential and 10% lower impacts in terms of terrestrial ecotoxicity than conventional Portland cement mortar.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生命周期评价火电厂废粉煤灰替代硅藻土在可持续地聚合物中的应用
本研究证明了硅藻土作为粉煤灰替代品的潜力,可以改善机械性能和环境可持续性,并将其作为可持续建筑的可行替代品。此外,还对生产的砂浆进行了生命周期评估(LCA),采用从摇篮到闸门的方法定量比较了它们对环境的影响。在混合物中,用它代替硅藻土,比例为粉煤灰重量的1%、2%、3%、4%和5%。进行了工作性、单位重量、抗弯抗压强度、耐磨性、耐高温性和显微组织分析。结果表明,添加1%、2%和3%硅藻土可提高砂浆的抗压和抗弯强度。2%的硅藻土替代品提供了最好的效果。3%硅藻土包裹体的FESEM结果显示,地聚合物的微观结构更致密、强度更大。硅藻土包裹体增加了地聚合物的耐磨性。由于发现2%硅藻土的替代品是最佳的,LCA结果表明,与常规波特兰水泥砂浆相比,含有2%硅藻土的地聚合物砂浆在全球变暖潜势方面的影响降低了25%,在陆地生态毒性方面的影响降低了10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
A two-phase mathematical model for hospital waste management during an epidemic outbreak under uncertainty Evolution of methane emissions during the early stage of municipal solid waste deposition in a tropical landfill Generation and prediction of regional building-related construction and demolition (C&D) waste for Meghalaya state, India: case study Economic feasibility analysis of power generation from coffee grounds biomass power plants: focusing on Seoul and Gyeonggi Province Thermal risk assessment of organic sludge solid fuel via experimental evaluation and heat transfer simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1