Comparative analysis of machine learning models for wind speed forecasting: Support vector machines, fine tree, and linear regression approaches

Q1 Chemical Engineering International Journal of Thermofluids Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101217
Yousef Altork
{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning models for wind speed forecasting: Support vector machines, fine tree, and linear regression approaches","authors":"Yousef Altork","doi":"10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wind speed is an important parameter of wind energy conversion, and its forecast is significant for optimal power generation and maintaining the stability of the electricity supply. In this work, three predictive models, namely Fine Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Linear Regression, are assessed using meteorological data from the National Wind Technology Center (NWTC) in Boulder, Colorado, for the period 2019–2023. The meteorological variables that have been incorporated into the dataset are wind direction, air temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, precipitation, and wind speed at 50 m height. The evaluation of the performance of the models used Root mean squared error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R²). The findings show that the Linear Regression model has the best accuracy (RMSE = 0.29555, MSE = 0.08735, MAE = 0.18061, R² = 0.97), followed by the SVM model (RMSE = 0.32275, R² = 0.96) and then the Fine Tree model (RMSE = 0.44042, R² = 0.93). These results have demonstrated Linear Regression in enhancing wind speed prediction, where future studies should investigate the combination of the forecasted models or other different machine learning models to improve the accuracy of prediction internationally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermofluids","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermofluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202725001648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wind speed is an important parameter of wind energy conversion, and its forecast is significant for optimal power generation and maintaining the stability of the electricity supply. In this work, three predictive models, namely Fine Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Linear Regression, are assessed using meteorological data from the National Wind Technology Center (NWTC) in Boulder, Colorado, for the period 2019–2023. The meteorological variables that have been incorporated into the dataset are wind direction, air temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, precipitation, and wind speed at 50 m height. The evaluation of the performance of the models used Root mean squared error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R²). The findings show that the Linear Regression model has the best accuracy (RMSE = 0.29555, MSE = 0.08735, MAE = 0.18061, R² = 0.97), followed by the SVM model (RMSE = 0.32275, R² = 0.96) and then the Fine Tree model (RMSE = 0.44042, R² = 0.93). These results have demonstrated Linear Regression in enhancing wind speed prediction, where future studies should investigate the combination of the forecasted models or other different machine learning models to improve the accuracy of prediction internationally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风速预报机器学习模型的比较分析:支持向量机、精细树和线性回归方法
风速是风能转换的重要参数,风速的预测对优化发电和保持供电稳定具有重要意义。在这项工作中,使用2019-2023年期间科罗拉多州博尔德国家风能技术中心(NWTC)的气象数据,评估了三种预测模型,即Fine Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM)和Linear Regression。已纳入数据集的气象变量为风向、气温、相对湿度、大气压、降水和50米高度的风速。使用均方根误差(RMSE)、均方误差(MSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和决定系数(R²)对模型的性能进行评价。结果表明,线性回归模型的准确率最高(RMSE = 0.29555, MSE = 0.08735, MAE = 0.18061, R²= 0.97),支持向量机模型次之(RMSE = 0.32275, R²= 0.96),细树模型次之(RMSE = 0.44042, R²= 0.93)。这些结果证明了线性回归在增强风速预测方面的作用,未来的研究应该研究预测模型或其他不同的机器学习模型的组合,以提高国际预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Thermofluids
International Journal of Thermofluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
A comparative investigation of the flow of Williamson, micropolar, and Maxwell nanofluids influenced by a stretched surface, considering bioconvection, double diffusion, activation energy, and slip effects Numerical simulation and parametric study of effective parameters in a thermoelectric dehumidifier with cooled plate using the Peltier effect Combine optimizations of rheologically complex fluids using a multiscale hybrid nanofluid across a vertical stretching/ shrinking disk: Response surface method Mitigating particulate matter from a multi-cylinder high-sulfur diesel engine using waste-cooking-oil biodiesel blends: Emissions and efficiency assessment Clustering of magnetic microcapsules in forced convection: Effects of temperature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1