Using a Foreign Language Increases Risk-Taking in Prenatal Testing Decisions but Not due to Attenuated Emotional Responses

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Behavioral Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1002/bdm.70016
Rafał Muda, Paweł Niszczota, Damian Hamerski, Michał Białek
{"title":"Using a Foreign Language Increases Risk-Taking in Prenatal Testing Decisions but Not due to Attenuated Emotional Responses","authors":"Rafał Muda,&nbsp;Paweł Niszczota,&nbsp;Damian Hamerski,&nbsp;Michał Białek","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>People take more risks when deciding on their foreign language. In three lab experiments (<i>N</i> = 424), we explored two explanations of this phenomenon: reduced anticipation of regret or increased accessibility of risk-increasing thoughts. Participants in native or foreign language conditions considered two prenatal tests: a less sensitive but safe and a more sensitive one—their task was to specify the level of risk of miscarriage of the more sensitive test while still choosing it. Subsequently, they estimated the anticipated regret associated with not selecting the riskier test and discovering the child has a detectable disorder (Experiments 1 and 2) or with taking the riskier test and miscarrying (Experiment 3). Three studies confirmed a greater willingness to accept risk when using a foreign language (meta-analytic effect <i>d</i> = 0.40), but this effect was not mediated by changes in the accessibility of thoughts or anticipated regret.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People take more risks when deciding on their foreign language. In three lab experiments (N = 424), we explored two explanations of this phenomenon: reduced anticipation of regret or increased accessibility of risk-increasing thoughts. Participants in native or foreign language conditions considered two prenatal tests: a less sensitive but safe and a more sensitive one—their task was to specify the level of risk of miscarriage of the more sensitive test while still choosing it. Subsequently, they estimated the anticipated regret associated with not selecting the riskier test and discovering the child has a detectable disorder (Experiments 1 and 2) or with taking the riskier test and miscarrying (Experiment 3). Three studies confirmed a greater willingness to accept risk when using a foreign language (meta-analytic effect d = 0.40), but this effect was not mediated by changes in the accessibility of thoughts or anticipated regret.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用外语会增加产前检测决策中的风险承担,但并非因为情绪反应减弱
人们在选择外语的时候会冒更多的风险。在三个实验室实验(N = 424)中,我们探讨了这一现象的两种解释:减少对后悔的预期或增加对风险增加想法的可及性。母语或外语条件下的参与者考虑两种产前测试:一种不太敏感但安全,另一种更敏感——他们的任务是在选择更敏感的测试时指定流产的风险水平。随后,他们估计了与没有选择风险较高的测试并发现孩子有可检测的障碍(实验1和2)或与接受风险较高的测试和流产(实验3)相关的预期后悔(实验1和2)。三项研究证实,使用外语时更愿意接受风险(元分析效应d = 0.40),但这种影响不是由思想可及性或预期后悔的变化介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad base of content and style. It publishes original empirical reports, critical review papers, theoretical analyses and methodological contributions. The Journal also features book, software and decision aiding technique reviews, abstracts of important articles published elsewhere and teaching suggestions. The objective of the Journal is to present and stimulate behavioral research on decision making and to provide a forum for the evaluation of complementary, contrasting and conflicting perspectives. These perspectives include psychology, management science, sociology, political science and economics. Studies of behavioral decision making in naturalistic and applied settings are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
The Martyrdom Effect in Judgment: Fatal Self-Sacrifice Boosts Evaluations for Both Beneficial and Harmful Actors Anchoring Bias in the Tradeoff Procedure Within Multi-Attribute Value Theory Issue Information How Responses to Sexual Harassment and Moral Values Shape Investment Decision Making Correction to “Who Is Afraid of the Pink Elephant? Evidence on (Not) Ignoring Inadmissible Evidence and Debiasing Interventions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1