Analyzing the Release of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Spent Granular Activated Carbons by Standard Leaching Procedures

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL 环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c12093
Paulina Alulema-Pullupaxi, Yi Zhang, Navid B. Saleh, Arjun Venkatesan, Onur G. Apul
{"title":"Analyzing the Release of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Spent Granular Activated Carbons by Standard Leaching Procedures","authors":"Paulina Alulema-Pullupaxi, Yi Zhang, Navid B. Saleh, Arjun Venkatesan, Onur G. Apul","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c12093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent national primary drinking water regulation for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is expected to drive a nationwide increase in granular activated carbon (GAC) usage in water treatment facilities across the United States. Proper management of PFAS-laden GAC waste streams is essential to prevent potential recontamination. This study systematically evaluates PFOA and PFOS leaching from four commercial GACs using three standard batch leaching procedures. Our findings indicate that PFOA leached 1–2 orders of magnitude more than PFOS across all GAC types and leaching procedures. In general, PFAS leaching was more notable for alkaline leaching conditions, especially for wood-based GAC. Additionally, real groundwater spiked with an 8 PFAS mixture was used to load GAC for leaching propensity demonstration, and similar conclusions were reached, where leaching was generally greater for shorter-chain and more hydrophilic PFAS. PFBA exhibited the highest leaching (10.4%), followed by GenX (0.91%) and PFBS (0.75%), while minimal desorption (<0.02%) was observed for long-chain PFOA, PFOS, PFOSA, and PFNA. The study concluded that a complex interplay of multiple interactions between the GAC surface, PFAS molecules, and constituents of leaching solutions controls leaching.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent national primary drinking water regulation for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is expected to drive a nationwide increase in granular activated carbon (GAC) usage in water treatment facilities across the United States. Proper management of PFAS-laden GAC waste streams is essential to prevent potential recontamination. This study systematically evaluates PFOA and PFOS leaching from four commercial GACs using three standard batch leaching procedures. Our findings indicate that PFOA leached 1–2 orders of magnitude more than PFOS across all GAC types and leaching procedures. In general, PFAS leaching was more notable for alkaline leaching conditions, especially for wood-based GAC. Additionally, real groundwater spiked with an 8 PFAS mixture was used to load GAC for leaching propensity demonstration, and similar conclusions were reached, where leaching was generally greater for shorter-chain and more hydrophilic PFAS. PFBA exhibited the highest leaching (10.4%), followed by GenX (0.91%) and PFBS (0.75%), while minimal desorption (<0.02%) was observed for long-chain PFOA, PFOS, PFOSA, and PFNA. The study concluded that a complex interplay of multiple interactions between the GAC surface, PFAS molecules, and constituents of leaching solutions controls leaching.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用标准浸出程序分析废颗粒活性炭中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的释放
最近关于全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的国家一级饮用水法规预计将推动美国各地水处理设施中颗粒活性炭(GAC)的使用在全国范围内增加。妥善管理含有pfas的GAC废物流对于防止潜在的再污染至关重要。本研究采用三种标准的批量浸出程序系统地评估了四种商用活性炭中PFOA和PFOS的浸出。我们的研究结果表明,在所有GAC类型和浸出过程中,PFOA的浸出量比PFOS多1-2个数量级。总的来说,PFAS浸出在碱性浸出条件下更为显著,特别是对木质GAC。此外,使用掺入8 PFAS混合物的真实地下水来加载GAC以进行淋滤倾向论证,得出了类似的结论,其中短链和更亲水的PFAS淋滤通常更大。PFBA的脱附率最高(10.4%),其次是GenX(0.91%)和PFBS(0.75%),而长链PFOA、PFOS、PFOSA和PFNA的脱附率最低(0.02%)。该研究得出结论,GAC表面、PFAS分子和浸出溶液成分之间的多重相互作用是控制浸出的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
期刊最新文献
Spatially Optimized Nutrient Management as a Climate-Resilient Strategy to Reduce Nitrogen Runoff from Global Croplands. Toward "Safe" Chemicals and Materials on Mars: Knowledge Gaps for Expanding Planetary Protection Requirements. Mechanistic Insights into Mercury Photoreduction: Effects of Dissolved Organic Matter and Inorganic Carbon in Seawater. Applying Thermal Proteome Profiling to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): Proteome-Wide Identification of Molecular Targets and Early Events PM2.5 from Stir-Fry Cooking in Chinese Cities Leads to Significant Health Impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1